Banning Myself

Just for information about my part that is being discussed.

This is the A2K thread where the inclusion of my blog link was previously discussed:
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3665&highlight=


The following is only email that I sent. The earlier blog entry that was quoted is the only one I have made concerning the issue.


Odd - you don't want me me to post my blog link, but you have no
problems coming onto my blog, taking my content, and posting it on your
site. I never mentioned A2K by name anywhere at anytime in my blog and
I have never posted an A2K link - so the only people who would know the
site I'm talking about on my blog are people who would have already
seen my post on A2K. Pretty easy to use my words anyway you want when
no one can link to my site through A2K to see the original post. Talk
about a double-standand.

You can have your rules, and I have mine. Do not take my content from
my site and post it as random quotes on A2K in your argument against
me. I own my content, as you own yours. I didn't even use any quotes
from my A2K post on my blog, knowing that the content becomes your
property.

I didn't expect personalized notice - I questioned why there
wasn't even a Announcement post denoting the change no longer allowing
links in sigs. It affects more people than just me (as I also noted).
The last we talked about it the link was "perfectly fine the way you
have it". Again, you issue Announcements on the Forum about changes
when it suits you. Taking the 60 seconds to do that seems a lot less
time than all the time you've wasted on this. You don't give
consideration, therefore you get none. You're mad because I posted a
bitch-fest - glad I didn't send you a PM, seeing as you are too busy to
read them or respond.

You run the site like 5 year old throwing a temper tantrum. Run it
anyway you want it, I really don't care.

Point taken.

Great now that it's posted here I can comment on it.

I referenced your insults on your blog. I did not "copy" your content.

Care to stand by the body of your actions Sugar? I'd like you to have the integrity to defend your reactions and insults.

Edit: Nemind, I've a busy few days ahead of me and can't keep up with this.

Silly is as silly does ... and this thread is doing lots of silly, IMHO.

LOL!

I dont think anyone here can claim to have been the one to remain civil, while the other purportedly hasn't, by the way. You seem to have pretty much kept par with each other.

On the other hand, telling the other to "let it go" is also a little silly - if you want this discussion to stop, then stop it.

I agree, nimh ... "I'll quit if you will" ... "OK, you quit first." ... "No, YOU quit first." ... "No waaaaay! YOU quit first!"


Chorus: "Mo-o-o-om! He/She won't quit!"

Perhaps.



I disagree. I can name several lines of insults that Sugar and Quinn took up that were not reciprocated, some that I was suprised at because I'd considered it far below them.