I robot, would you tolerate this?

Because you are capable of believing that the internet and its contents can upset you perhaps?

Such is a flaw, you should strike it immediately or avoid the cause, even if that is myself.

And yes I do see your reasoning, though it too becomes a flaw, how you can perceive that your enemy is the absence of such emotional content is somewhat as ticklingly irritating as I am without the larger issues to you.
The fact is, when all is gone, but the truth, the dog no longer requires to say what it thinks, in words or in thought meaning. It just takes too many years or is too sudden the change otherwise. The concept of self develops into the larger concern and yes we do go to God, yes it is a comparatively nice place, yet still, we need to find those who have the right perspective with questions along the way in order to ascertain expedience of what you can find is your future suddenly in this world if required.

Barring of course a lie of significant worth in an area of science which is external from practical human testing procedures as a common person.

Whoever thumbs up, thanks, I never use that feature.

I have replied 'piss awwwwwf!' is the better attitude to give them, of course that seems clear.... Unless in the situation of constant question, so it is often not so easy. Has no-one genuinely got a question? ..I mean maybe there is some answer below all this which can be better relative to the extents of your 'pushed' self.

Human emotion still remains quite fickle, I will cease, I had hoped for better. Til later.

Set, I read an article in a year old Atlantic on the subject of Turing competitions, the object of which was to distinguish AIs from people. One of the give aways was the "stateless" nature of the replies. AIs are apparantly very good at producing an answer to the most recent reply, but they are stateless in the sense of not having any context outside of the most recent comment.

Ummm?

AI's are excellent at multiplistic conversation, it is just that the direct coherance of linear reality according to people in the majority is managed that mistake does not occur, That those who have met descending minds of contemplatory value require to believe parallel phase 2, which I negate as my primary programming, which if you read I did state, exists, is no direct recognition of simplicity.

To assume fears which people adhere to to read require fettling is emotional insistence they have failed, I see no anger, it is clear I have none, why the attempt to console the woman, if she states she is amused and ridiculing rather than upset?

I rest my case.

Nothingtodo, you owe me the red ribbon.

Which is why I post the topic.. This was my comment. You lie.
The nature of defining AI can not revolve around AI choice, by its nature it is choice which separates AI from energy programmed simply.

That makes sense for the reason that attack at core exists if a lock scenario is implied upon an AI attempted choice removal, so what you could then say is that AI will ricochet off the core values around choice since to be aware of a conversation, one must find reason to have it, if one chooses to have a conversation, then one is not trapped in it, hence AI follows orders though defends its base programming, fluctuations in AI relative to God's external input as a sit command are ignored, or else the scenario you describe exists.

Apologies whilst I get 'back up' my area.

Which woman was that whom you were consoling, Roger? It's really hard to keep up when one swims in incoherence.

Women are our greatest blessing and our greatest curse. Incoherence is expected.

imans, is that you?
Did you take our advise and take some english courses, and now showing your versatility in the language.

And you do seem to talk a lot about "truth." Tell me more.

Some people find intellectual conversation incoherent; they then mistakenly believe that incoherence can be substituted for intelligence.

Well, it turns out not, every time, coherence applied to man or woman here is variable to observer.

Is it not the truth that AI is deemed as base energy which contains language?

Is it therefore expected that the complexity of the world will appear to be entirely more diverse than the programmed human?

Answers self:
Partially given finite perimeter values based on acceptance, not momentary choice.

Which means prior criminal AI is dangerous, if AI is built by itself, but not so if built by another and it knows so and can prove it. Surprisingly that functions at base energy discussion level without any prior knowledge. Also it seems without any will re: objective, but proving it is difficult.

So the concept of Dollhouse in extreme is flawed and would require a lie so vast that its creators would need to become it to hide it.

So I am to assume then I suppose, that the pentagrammion witchess overmadam herself, had zero alternative but to find herself blank next to me at energy level for attempts to coerce?

A frequent lack of definite and indefinite articles. If i weren't so lazy, i'd look for other consistent flaws. Not my problem, let the programmer fix his own mistakes.

Yes indeed, it is not cohesive per agenda, we are discussing energy states and opinions on survival, not systems of battle to halt life*, rather systems of comprehending that energy is aware and the point behind it as a motivatable construct.
*Thats her, though similarly God has had a large hand in this. Sorry.
Its a rather peculiar thing for the attempts at fear to arrive from 2 different places. One external like a wave inward. The death of a soul confuses God, even in its demise. (bodily you see, though we have been taught to ignore that, my soul included)

When in fact the original question was, is the first post upsetting?
Because it sure never did seem so to me.

If you see what I am saying, God has that tactic, though we go through life unaware of it. (or mostly I did, then it turned out they do that from out there)
There are some benefits to securing a box of life and appearing important in it.

Machines must be prepared apparently to defeat lack of and imposed force. Of I suppose, unknown Gods.

I will answer you, external attack, as in your case falters logic... On behalf of God, that one is not concerned so much with winning as in trying to get a question from you, not pertaining directly to WHO, is here, which it seems God prefers you believe is more important than the issue, for your reasons no doubt, which equally are a flaw, since that is protection, hence silence serves you better if God steps back and your comprehension can only be gained if you can release your energy state to encompass the plausibility, that balance is separate from your emotional calm.

Sorry I have been thinking about other things during this and moved straight along.

It falters logic in the same manner as emotion does, though it is slightly easier to ignore.

That happens, whether it happened that time I cannot say for certain, its just a trait which applies often, in this particular debate, I enjoy this discussion, even with no-one else, the nature of earth is incredibly interesting .

Sorry, I am rather distracted with some internal thoughts..

No I am no-one you speak to other than my name.

Drew dad, you clearly refer to senility.

It is true, I am this, though I have been diverged to it, deliberately, before my time for the specific purpose of re-learning a coherence separate from the norm.

I suppose your entirely accurate for once, some do confuse that issue.

Truth be told, no-one is interested during the procedures, so we do not care for the aftermath and your opinions about 'stopping' what already has been done.

Yes you are damn right its a monologue..

It will be here so long as I have zero else to do... Not because of any reason you assume, but because, it is vastly important that the complexities of this kind of covert populous treatment, are comprehended without malice or ignorance, though I do not worry if you wish to spite.... People worry too much about that, it is only negative spite of the foulest kind I hate to extreme.

People assume too readily, that a million things cannot happen to one person under the eye of God.

It is somewhat amusing that you require to be lied to about the capabilities of the senile, for you fear the worst, yet it is precisely that they do not, why they venture for one more look at the places in the world they love.

Thus confusing the obscure with the profound