The infinite disagreeing man...

I reject coherence Fil on the basis that nothing means anything

I was hopping for a cyclic chain of relative relations out of which the process was the glue of reality, but suffices to say I can see you are headed to infinite diversity a conceptual aberration that I intuitively disagree with...

That's just simply not so

...well if truly it is the case that you reject coherence what do you mean with "rejecting coherence" after all ?

Is this the man you seek?
He shows himself at 1:29


That's how I picture it, anyway.

so she is askin u to coherently explain what rejectin coherence is

n u know why??? bc she knows it is impossible while meanin to take advantage of that to turn it into infinite diversity conceptions that will prove her right in whatever **** she says as fact being

u at least mean smthg that u hold on to u r not a hundred percent liar like she is more hundredpercent piece of dirty pervert head to an extreme about others just bc she cant b but from takin smthg

If I were sure then yes, Fil, it would be contradictory but your point is well taken though everything I assert is complete nonsense

Seriously though. Fil, the general principle that nothing is entirely anything while everything is partly something else negates any conclusion at which we might arrive, including this one

that is how truth in a way first existence is through killin lies

nothing dont pretend anything and everything superiority wont force inferiority

present is by recognizin the right past that is relative to present rights

so existence is real when past and present are noone but objective rights

killin lies is meanin past truth rights that everything and everyone seem to abuse its absence since not the present truth superiority