There is no WHY

Rick you might be essentially correct regarding those three categories but the apodictical existential pantheist maintains an abstract being whose body is the Universe and whose mind is all the activity therein. Doesn't matter what you call it

Intuitively it would appear that the Whole Shebang would be meaningless without the humanoid, in other words that there's something more to the Universe than the meaningless, random, depressing portrayal of particles bouncing off one another. It seems that everything has been adjusted--within a fraction of one percent in some cases--to make evolution possible

But don't ask me about the mechanism by which that was achieved; some of this Entire Megillah has to remain a mystery

But Why?

I also like to mess with HOW.

WHY and HOW don't really matter , both are a diversion from the fact that this is where we live

I'm sure that more advanced beings could careless about the whys and hows and get on with where we are and understand

HOW is extremely important if you play in science. It comes right after "What the ****?"

Sometimes a dewtailed investigation into HOW, often leades into the edges of WHY.

WHY does a DNA ribosome always clump itself into groups of 3 pairs of nuclwotidwa

Okay, I give up. WHY?

Because it can !

I really like that: "the edges of why".

You mean, of course, "could not care less..."

man, is my typing fucked up. Ive taken to watching the keyboard now as I am typing with both hands.
I meant to say

"Groups of 3 nucleotides" not whatever that word was I typed.

for more protein variation...

I kind of figured that out, fm. But I still don't know WHY.

me neither but Im sure someone who knows will pipe up.

the question why mean to point quality being the truth

the question how or who mean to point quantity being the truth which include the concept of size for the who and the concept of objective reality for the how

that is how why dont mean an answer, it is the answer by itself meaning quality always is the reason, why to prove how any negative or will is simply to support the quality as the only existing fact

so there is always reasons for superficial things and i dont mean objective existence for superficial things i really mean superficial things being never existing really in truth

and that is why how or who never mean to question any but to point itself as the reason showing smthg for being through

so the difference between why and how who is selfishness

why as an answer is selfishless since truly point objective quality superiority

while what is pointing objective things with the how and who in conception of objects mean itself being ends or wills

which in a way prove that quality is really the truth in opposition to quantity

u could b all existence but if u r **** then u r liars and truth is surely elsewhere existing

there cant b smthg to call true so definitive and always unless it is forever right and constant free source so definitive value which justify its quality being permanent

qua lity is to what so determination of values in minimal isolated idea of a thing
quan tity is to where or when so to relative appearance nothing serious in maximal objective dimension that is barely connected with the quantity meant

now u mean quantity as truth for u why would quality b the truth instead of quantity that gives the constant forms of anything existing

bc all is meaning one by destroying itself being any but nothing, and bc u have no quality of bein true so why n how would ur perspective of truth b true

Maybe it's because WHY is a feeling -- can't be described with words.

Interesting by the sheerest coincidence Rick you should so speculate, it's right on as Zen

http://able2know.org/topic/202342-1

Dale, as I see it--rightly or wrongly--zen enjoys the absense of such feelings. Zen frees one from questions rather than providing their answers.