0
   

John Edwards trial opens with a jolt

 
 
Reply Tue 24 Apr, 2012 11:15 am
Apr. 24, 2012
Edwards trial opens with a jolt
Anne Blythe | McClatchy Newspapers

GREENSBORO, N.C. -- ]

It did not take long for the John Edwards trial to get tawdry, and for once it was not the former presidential candidate at the center of the salacious allegations.

It was Andrew Young, the former aide who is expected to be a key witness for the prosecution.

Lawyers had just selected the nine men and seven women who will spend the next several weeks in the jury box when Judge Catherine Eagles shifted the focus from the defendant to Young. His testimony will be at the heart of the government's claims that Edwards, 58, violated campaign finance laws in his 2008 presidential run to cover up his extramarital affair with Rielle Hunter.

With the jury of 12 and four alternates cleared from the courtroom, Eagles revealed that defense attorneys had asked permission to mention in their opening statement a one-night stand that Young, a married man and father of three, had with a co-worker in 2007.

The defense also wanted to let jurors know that Young, the aide who wrote an unflattering tell-all book of the 2008 campaign, had called several witnesses during the last several weeks and asked what they were going to say at trial.

It was barely one hour into the first day of testimony and sex and conniving had already surfaced in a trial based on a scandal first reported by The National Enquirer.

However in the courtroom packed with media, sketch artists and curious lawyers, Eagles muzzled any unprompted mentioning of Young's alleged sexual liaison.

"The court finds there's no good reason to bring this up in opening statements," Eagles said.

The judge did, however, agree to permit mention of the phone calls as long as defense attorneys did not call it "witness tampering," which is illegal.

Young, who was the first witness called by prosecutors, opened his testimony with a bit of his personal history and an account of his first star-struck meeting with Edwards in 1998 during the U.S. Senate campaign. He is expected to be on the witness stand for the next several days.

Young, while on the stand, mentioned his first meeting with Hunter in September 2006. She was with Edwards at Dulles Airport in Washington, D.C., where the private jets come in. Young gave the two a ride and said he was suspicious then that they were having a relationship.

Young, who's been charged at least two times with driving while impaired, also gave an account of getting one DWI after he drank heavily and argued with his wife about his work with Edwards.

She complained that he was not getting any big jobs with the campaign, that he had not moved up through the ranks. "My response was I believe in this man," Young testified.

Young's testimony was preceded by opening statements that focused as much on Young as Edwards.

Prosecutors tried to portray the former staffer as a star-struck political groupie who was deceived and manipulated by Edwards, a man they described as overly and blindly ambitious with "selective memory."

Prosecutor David Harbach acknowledged that Young had been granted immunity and would be testifying with the hopes of not being prosecuted. Young and his wife had mixed money from at least one wealthy supporter with their own. He has been dishonest in his book and when he claimed briefly to be the father of Quinn, the daughter born from the extramarital affair of Rielle Hunter and Edwards.

"You will not like him," Harbach conceded. "But remember this, Mr. Young is an exhibit as well as a witness."

Defense attorney Allison Van Laningham, a plainspoken Greensboro lawyer brought onto the Edwards team about a month ago, urged jurors to follow the money in the case. That trail, she contended, would lead them to a $1.5 million house on a $300,000 lot just outside Chapel Hill where Young, a political staffer, and his wife, Cheri, a part-time nurse, live.

The $750,000 provided by Listerine heiress Rachel "Bunny" Mellon, Laningham said, did not go to Edwards. It ended up "in the pockets of Andrew and Cheri Young and it ended up in the wood, the stone and the roof of their $1.5 million home in Chapel Hill," she said.

The six-count indictment against Edwards accuses him of conspiring to secretly obtain more than $900,000 from two wealthy supporters - Mellon, a centenarian who lives on a 4,000-acre estate in Virginia, and Fred Baron, a Texas lawyer who died in October 2008.

Defense attorneys conceded that Edwards figured out at some point that Baron had been providing money to Hunter, but they contended he was doing so as a friend.

Baron, Van Laningham pointed out, continued to provide money for Hunter long after Edwards discontinued his presidential run in January 2008.

Edwards, his defense team contended, had no idea that payments for his mistress from two supporters could be classified as campaign finances.

Instead, the defense pointed a finger at Young, saying he not only devised the scheme of getting payment and claiming paternity on his own, but that he did it to fatten his own private coffers.

"The evidence will show you the manipulation lies with Andrew Young himself," Van Laningham said.

Edwards, his defense team contends, is a man who loves all his children. He's a man, Van Laningham said, who tried to hide his continued affair with Hunter, a campaign videographer, and her pregnancy from his wife.

"John Edwards," Van Laningham said in her 45-minute opening statement, "is a man who has committed many sins, but no crimes."

  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,533 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Apr, 2012 06:55 am
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
Apr. 27, 2012
At Edwards trial, Young admits to spending hush money on himself
Anne Blythe | McClatchy Newspapers

GREENSBORO, N.C. -- ]

After four days of testimony, it has been difficult at times to tell who is on trial - John Edwards, the former presidential candidate accused of secretly obtaining hundreds of thousands of dollars in illegal campaign contributions, or Andrew Young, the political aide that defense lawyers contend used the money to feather a fancy nest of his own.

As the first week of the Edwards trial closes, the man who has been billed as a key witness for the prosecution has been described as a liar, a sycophant and a star struck political groupie who felt spurned by a man he thought would give him and his family a ticket to the palaces of power.

Young, the lead witness for prosecutors in a case that will test the limits of campaign finance law, is expected to be on the stand again Friday for further cross-examination and then any rebuttal questions from the government.

Prosecutor David Harbach told jurors in his opening statement that at the end of the day, they might not like Young.

And for much of Thursday, defense lawyer Abbe Lowell fired question after question at the lead witness, picking apart his testimony with a copy of Young's 2011 book, "The Politician," an account of the 2008 campaign, transcripts from various meetings with federal investigators, speeches and interviews, and testimony he provided for a federal grand jury.

Young often responded with, "I don't know" or "I don't recall" or "Could you repeat the question?"

Toward the end of the Thursday court session, Young conceded that he sunk much of the money from two wealthy Edwards' supporters into the walls, stone, roof and luxurious amenities of his $1.5 million Orange County, N.C., house.

Lowell, a high-priced, high-profile lawyer out of Washington, D.C., voiced frustration at lunchtime Thursday when the jury and Young were out of the room. Judge Catherine Eagles cautioned him that she was about to criticize him for taking too much time, delaying the trial. Throughout the morning, he had to hunt for exhibit after exhibit after Young testified that he could not recall sequences of events or words he had spoken.

Young continued that behavior through the afternoon, but Lowell through repeated questioning was able to offer a different account for jurors to consider by the end of the day.

Prosecutors contend Edwards conspired to obtain nearly $1 million from philanthropist Rachel "Bunny" Mellon and wealthy Texas lawyer Fred Baron to hide Edwards' pregnant mistress from the media during the Democrat's 2008 presidential run.

Rielle Hunter, a campaign videographer, and Edwards, a married candidate who had fostered a family-man image, had an extramarital affair and a child from that liaison.

Young, who testified in great detail for prosecutors, said the scheme came about after a disgruntled Hunter threatened to go public with the affair in 2007.

But Lowell accused Young of making that up.

Lowell further suggested that Young had been seeking reimbursements for a car, flight, travel and living expenses for Hunter when he already had obtained hundreds of thousands of dollars from Mellon.

At one point, Lowell fired a question at Young, asking him whether he had not submitted a summary of expenses to Baron, trying to suggest to the Texas lawyer that he was in the hole.

"I think that's fair, yes, sir," Young said.

Young also acknowledged that while he and his wife, Cheri, were in Santa Barbara, Calif., the last place they went to hide with Hunter, they made numerous change orders on the home they were building just outside Chapel Hill, N.C., adding a swimming pool, a home theater and a guest room over the garage.

"We were living out in Santa Barbara," Young conceded. "We lost our perspective."

That afternoon testimony capped a morning in which Lowell pointed out that Young had called Mellon either a day or a couple of days before the checks arrived from the Listerine heiress, bolstering the defense theory that Young was the beneficiary of most of the Mellon and Baron money.

Not a penny went to Edwards, Young said, and as far as he knew, he said, none went to the campaign.

That is the key issue for the jury.

They must decide whether the $900,000 from Baron and Mellon were campaign expenses, and if so, whether Edwards knew about them. Edwards' lawyers contend that the gifts were personal donations and not covered by campaign-finance law.

0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

It didnt take long for this to happen - Discussion by mysteryman
Busy Days for John Edwards - Discussion by woiyo
John Edwards: The America We Believe In - Discussion by BumbleBeeBoogie
It's kerry and Edwards - Discussion by au1929
 
  1. Forums
  2. » John Edwards trial opens with a jolt
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/23/2024 at 07:35:30