@oristarA,
We have a place, all of us, in a long story. A story we continue, but whose end we will not see. It is the story of a new world that became a friend and liberator of the old, a story of a slave-holding society that became a servant of freedom, the story of a power that went into the world to protect but not possess, to defend but not to conquer.
Quote:Merry explains:
Apparently the meaning is intended to be that this abstract personification -- "the world" -- is a friend of the old (not necessarily of anyone else)as well as a liberator of the old. If you put in that second article ("a"), you're implying that "the world" is a friend to all but a liberator specifically of the old. And that's not the intent of the writer.
"Selected Answer" - were you feeling sorry for Lustig Andrei, Ori?
Who is the "old" Merry describes? Doncha think that it might be helpful if Merry actually knew that the "abstract personification" was neither abstract or a personification?
Doncha think that it would have helped had Merry taken some time and effort to inform himself of the situation?
This is from GW Bush's inaurgural address 0f 2001
We have a place, all of us, in a long story -- a story we continue, but whose end we will not see. It is the story of a new world that became a friend and liberator of the old, a story of a slave-holding society that became a servant of freedom, the story of a power that went into the world to protect but not possess, to defend but not to conquer.
It is the American story -- a story of flawed and fallible people, united across the generations by grand and enduring ideals.
Merry must have known this but he did as Merry always does - he ran fast and far.
Ori's question: Why not use "a friend and a liberator of the old" but "a friend and liberator of the old?
Why not use "a friend and a liberator of the old"
instead of [but] "a friend and liberator of the old?
McTag might be seeing something that I have missed but we'll have to wait until he tells us what that is.
Using 'a' before 'liberator' only adds a bit of emphasis. If 'a' had been used it would have been because the speaker/speechwriter wanted to make the second stand out more.
Of course, and this is secondary to the question at hand, but important nevertheless, what GW Bush stated was a monumental lie. The US has never been a defender of freedom, a protector of freedom. It has used its enormous military power to slaughter and subjugate many people, to use them solely to enrich US business interests.