13
   

Separate but equal: single gender classrooms

 
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Dec, 2011 09:09 am
@sozobe,
What do you think they mean by "academic acumen"?

Insight into the purpose of academics?

Doesn't that change throughout one's life? Shouldn't it?

It seems a bit unfair for the writer to suggest that lack of academic achievement is based on bad habits and that once you're out of elementary school you've already blown your chance.

Off to read the whole article.....
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Dec, 2011 10:52 am
@sozobe,
I think the reasons for and against segregation change as you age. In elementary school, you separate the more mature, socially advanced girls from the more rambuctious boys. In high school, you reduce social pressure. I think middle school is the one place where boys and girls generally compete and cooperate as equals. The boys have reached a maturity level that allows them to function in co-ed teams and the social pressure has not reached the point where image is more important than accomplishment. I think the school you describe where the classes are single sex would be a great idea for a high school. It seems like that would be the best of both worlds.
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Dec, 2011 02:37 pm
@engineer,
engineer wrote:

I think the reasons for and against segregation change as you age.

What you describe is reasons for and against segregation as a function of the environment type - and not, as you state, as function of age. Segregation as function of environment is legal in the case of segregation by race in prisons - at least in California, where blacks, whites, and hispanics are placed in different rooms, and if at all possible also different buildings. Supposed to keep violence down, or something; segregation by sex applies to all prisons, far as I know, so I'm assuming that's legal. Still don't know how it's legal for schools to separate by sex (except phys.ed.) but not by race - why can prisons do it?
0 Replies
 
trulylost
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Dec, 2011 08:27 am
@boomerang,
pros, kids are "somehow" more controlled as teachers don't have to cater different genders which "rarely" causes better learning experience as single gender "especially guys" tend to act more aggressively and boldly in a male dominant environment than an environment where females are present.
Cons, kids will grow up not knowing much about the limits governing a relation between a guy and a girl, single gender schools tend to have higher bullying rate and kids in such schools might develop a gayish or bisexual habits.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Kid wouldn't fight, died of injuries - Discussion by gungasnake
Public school zero tolerance policies. - Question by boomerang
Dismantling the DC voucher program - Discussion by gungasnake
Adventures in Special Education - Discussion by littlek
home schooling - Discussion by dancerdoll
Can I get into an Ivy League? - Question by the-lazy-snail
Let's start an education forum - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Educational resources on the cheap - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 11:15:21