Reply
Mon 5 Sep, 2011 04:31 am
By this I mean less searchable....a few months back Google took away the the search with-in" option and now Yahoo! News will not let users stack search results by time...the best we can do is get a batch of the last days results, which for most searches of popular news stories will yield tens or hundreds of pages. The internet is only as good as is our ability to sift it for what we want efficiently, and are sifters are turning to ****.
Does anyone know why?
@hawkeye10,
I would say, don't look a gift horse in the mouth. Get a good book and build some synapses in your brain.
@Foofie,
Foofie wrote:
I would say, don't look a gift horse in the mouth. Get a good book and build some synapses in your brain.
Do you dispute the assertion that any vast information deposit is only as good as is the ability to sift it??
Quote:Yahoo's chief executive Carol Bartz has been fired by the internet company after two-and-a-half years in the top job.
The company said in a statement that Ms Bartz was removed by the board of directors, effective immediately.
Tim Morse, Yahoo's chief financial officer, will take over from Ms Bartz.
Yahoo has been struggling to increase its market share as it faces increased competition from rivals such as Google and Facebook.
Yahoo shares jumped more than 6% in after-hours trading after news of the firing broke, indicating they would trade higher when Wall Street opens for business on Wednesday. Yahoo's stock price was up at $13.72, an increase of 81 cents.
Mr Morse will serve as interim chief executive and the board of directors will look for a new CEO, the company said.
No turnaround
Ms Bartz was hired to run Yahoo in early 2009, taking over from co-founder Jerry Yang.
She made significant changes to the management team and cut jobs to save on costs. She also shifted the focus of the traditionally search-oriented firm towards more personalized content.
However, Larry Magid, a technology analyst at C-net, said the company has not seen enough of a turn-around under Ms Bartz's leadership.
"She hasn't done anything to change the company's fortunes, and they are still anxious to find a leader who can move them up," he said
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14816077
GOOD...and someone should do a study on the failure rate of female leaders of tech companies....it seems high compared to the men.
@hawkeye10,
Quote:SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- Carol Bartz's firing as Yahoo Inc.'s CEO isn't going to be enough to placate a loudening chorus of shareholders who believe Chairman Roy Bostock and his fellow board members also should be ousted after years of questionable choices that raised doubts about their competence.
The deepening disdain for Yahoo's board gained a potentially influential voice Thursday with the disclosure that successful hedge fund manager Daniel Loeb had bought a 5.2 percent stake in the company with designs on getting rid of Bostock and at least two other longtime directors.
Bartz, still technically a Yahoo board member, also fanned the flames in her first interview since Bostock fired her in a phone call late Tuesday. While defending her own decisions, Bartz called the board a bunch of "doofuses" in a profanity-laced interview with Fortune magazine.
Bartz, 63, wasn't a shareholder favorite either, but her description summarized the sentiment of many investors who have been stewing since Bostock and fellow board member Jerry Yang balked at Microsoft Corp.'s May 2008 offer to buy the company for $33 per share, or $47.5 billion. They insisted they were pursuing a strategy that would make Yahoo worth much more than Microsoft's bid, an argument that now looks absurd. Yahoo shares haven't closed above $20 in nearly three years. The stock finished Thursday at $14.44, a gain of 83 cents, or 6 percent, that was propelled by Loeb's attack on the board.
"This board has presided over some of the worst decisions made by any company in recent history," said Darren Chervitz, co-manager of the Jacob Internet Fund, a longtime Yahoo shareholder.
Even so, Yahoo's 10-member board probably still isn't viewed as the worst in Silicon Valley, said BGP Financial Partners Colin Gillis. He thinks that lowly title belongs to Hewlett-Packard Co.'s board, which has snooped into people's phone records and 13 months ago switched CEOs in a move that has been followed by a nearly 50 percent drop in the company's market value that has wiped out about $45 billion in shareholder wealth. By comparison, Yahoo's market value is about $30 billion below Microsoft's last offer
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Yahoos-board-under-fire-after-apf-2789583008.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=3&asset=&ccode=
The topic of the incompetence of HP can be found here
http://able2know.org/topic/176161-1
AND Here
http://able2know.org/topic/159776-1