0
   

WAS JUDAS NECESSARY???

Forums: Religion, Philosophy, Bible, Judas, Hell
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
hamilton
 
Reply Sun 31 Jul, 2011 11:37 am
i dont think so.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 2,225 • Replies: 13

 
Sturgis
 
  3  
Reply Sun 31 Jul, 2011 12:03 pm
@hamilton,
Yes.

Without him there'd be no Judas Priest




There'd be no song by that steak and pork chop wearing lady





Or is this about Judas Iscariot? He was needed so we'd know the dangers of betrayal.
0 Replies
 
wayne
 
  2  
Reply Sun 31 Jul, 2011 12:25 pm
@hamilton,
Necessary for what?
hamilton
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Aug, 2011 11:07 am
@wayne,
jesus to be crucified and us to be forgiven for torturing gods son to a painful and humiliating death.
is there any other way for jesus to have been captured?
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Aug, 2011 11:15 am
@hamilton,
He could have fallen down a hole. That way instead of making the sign of the cross, priests could pretend to fall down a hole.
chai2
 
  0  
Reply Mon 1 Aug, 2011 11:21 am
@izzythepush,
Or even better, not pretend, and really do it.

No symbolic holes though, like some pissant depression in the carpet.

A real hole, like 23 feet deep, and 9 feet in diameter
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Aug, 2011 11:23 am
@chai2,
With springs they could bounce back up again. Hey Presto! Instant Resurrection.
hamilton
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Aug, 2011 11:24 am
@izzythepush,
well jesus was the son of man, so man should do it as well, so why stop at priests?
chai2
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Aug, 2011 11:26 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

Hey Presto! Instant Resurrection.


Bob's your uncle.

I love that expression.
chai2
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Aug, 2011 11:26 am
@hamilton,
hamilton wrote:

well jesus was the son of man, so man should do it as well, so why stop at priests?


What about wo-man's?
chai2
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Aug, 2011 11:27 am
@chai2,
Indeed, why put an age restriction on it at all?

0 Replies
 
hamilton
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Aug, 2011 11:49 am
@chai2,
sorry. women as well...
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Aug, 2011 12:07 pm
@chai2,
chai2 wrote:

Bob's your uncle.


I may be wrong, but I think that's a reference to Robert Walpole, the man who was, to all intents and purposes, Britain's first prime minister during the reign of George I. George stayed in Germany, and Walpole's term in office was very corrupt and riddled with nepotism, hence 'Bob's Your Uncle.'

Or it's something from the Simpsons.
0 Replies
 
wayne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Aug, 2011 10:47 pm
@hamilton,
Maybe they could've fingerprinted him, of course, if he had no priors then they might need to see a photo I.D. or something.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

What if no religions are correct, but there still is a God? - Question by neologist
We are all like little children who often say: "Mom, Dad, leave me alone, I want to be on my own". - Question by Leaffan
How can we be sure that all religions are wrong? - Discussion by reasoning logic
Beyond tribalism; How well does your religious label serve you? - Discussion by MattDavis
Is religion responsible for the opposition to peace in the Israel-Palestine conflict? - Question by maxdancona
Concern for Religious Freedom or Preaching Political Messages? - Discussion by wandeljw
Why People Seek Solace In Gods. - Question by mark noble
Catholic remarried couples should abstain from sex - Question by Tes yeux noirs
How can a good God allow suffering - Question by SawyerMentink
Religion and Fear - Discussion by TomTomBinks
A question for athiests - Question by onevoice
 
  1. Forums
  2. » WAS JUDAS NECESSARY???
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 10:13:46
▲ ▼