23
   

Is this the beginning of the end of Rupert Murdoch's media empire?

 
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Aug, 2011 04:25 am
@McTag,
Cameron will be desperate to ensure Boris wins. The Tory PR machine will go into overdrive. As long as Boris is safely locked away in City Hall, he can't become an MP and challenge Cameron. If Boris loses, he can blame it all on Cameron, and become a Hesseltine-like figure.
Izzie
 
  2  
Reply Fri 2 Sep, 2011 12:58 pm
@izzythepush,


James Murdoch declines £3.7m bonus due to 'current controversy' over News of the World


Quote:
James Murdoch Turns Down $6 Million Bonus, Citing PhoneGate

September 2, 2011 at 11:49 am PT


News Corp. executive James Murdoch says he’ll decline a $6 million bonus the company gave him for his performance in its last fiscal year, citing the ongoing PhoneGate scandal.

Murdoch, who is Deputy Chief Operating Officer and until recently has been seen as the heir apparent to his father Rupert Murdoch. He has also been one of the primary focus points during the scandal, because he has been in charge of News Corp.’s British newspaper unit that has been accused of widespread, systemic phonetapping and other charges. (News Corp. also owns this Web site)

Here’s his statement:

In light of the current controversy surrounding News of the World, I have declined the bonus that the company chose to award to me. While the financial and operating performance metrics on which the bonus decision was based are not associated with this matter, I feel that declining the bonus is the right thing to do. I will consult with the Compensation Committee in the future about whether any bonus may be appropriate at a later date.

Murdoch is keeping the rest of his compensation, which includes a base salary of $3 million, $8.3 million in stock awards and other benefits including personal use of the company’s aircraft, which the filing values at $224,864 for the fiscal year.

In News Corp.’s annual proxy statement, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission today, the company said it considered the following factors in awarding him his $6 million bonus:

“Mr. J.R. Murdoch played an important role during fiscal 2011 in developing the Company’s key businesses and investments in Europe, Asia and the Middle East, including the development of the Company’s content and distribution strategy. He led the success of STAR India, which delivers market-leading content, and he led the Company’s ongoing deployment of satellite television in Italy (with Sky Italia achieving its highest ever subscriber base), the UK, Germany and India, where we operate, or are key investors in, industry-leading pay television platforms. Under his leadership, the Company expanded its presence in the Middle East through a key strategic partnership and optimized its European asset portfolio through the disposition of News Outdoor. Mr. J.R. Murdoch also successfully transitioned into his new role as Deputy Chief Operating Officer and Chairman and CEO, International, expanding his responsibilities.”


http://allthingsd.com/20110902/james-murdoch-turns-down-6-million-bonus-citing-phonegate/

<cough>
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Sep, 2011 08:05 pm
@Izzie,
Well I think that was very big of James to knock back his £3.7m bonus, Izzie.
It must have been a tough decision. Wink

But, heck, if that was merely his bonus, what is his actual salary?
The mind boggles!
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Sep, 2011 01:57 am
@msolga,
There was an article in yesterday's Guardian about it all. the $6m bonus was part of $18m pay package, so he still got $12m. Roop got $33m. Apparantly the knives are out for James, he was once the heir apparant, but his handling of this has not been good. The brackets are mine.

Quote:
Meanwhile, although Elisabeth(Murdoch) has emphatically denied saying, in a private conversation at a New York book launch in July, that Brooks and her brother(James) had "fucked the company", it was a sentiment that various allies say she nevertheless shared.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/sep/02/murdochs-divided-news-corporation-crisis?INTCMP=SRCH
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Sep, 2011 03:36 am
@izzythepush,
Thanks for the information.

I'm certain Rupert & James were worth every penny, izzy! Wink
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Sep, 2011 05:29 am
@msolga,
No-one has done more to ensure a shapely pair of breasts accompanies every newspaper.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Sep, 2011 11:51 am
@izzythepush,
Loads of stuff in today's paper.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/sep/06/phone-hacking-james-murdoch-neville-email

That's not all of it by a long chalk, but there are further links on the site.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 05:04 am
Eeerrrrrmmmm, did anything happen with this case?

Another case of pissing into the wind, perhaps?

Or did the NEXT BIG THING happen all of a sudden, and I missed it?
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 05:07 am
The Guardian is opening up its newslist
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/oct/09/the-guardian-newslists-opening-up

fad or phase change?
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 05:16 am
@hingehead,
Snow job then, Hinge?

Guilty as charged. LOL.

I guess the courts take a few years with stuff like this.

From your link. :- My bolds

Quote:
As Bismarck is said to have remarked about the process of passing legislation, many still think the business of making news is a bit like the business of making sausages: best kept out of sight from the end consumer. But in a world where many readers have been left deeply cynical about journalism after this summer's phone-hacking revelations, it seems there are more people wanting to know where their news comes from and how it is made. Painful as it might be for journalists to acknowledge, they might even have some improvements to make on the recipe too.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 06:02 am
@Builder,
Builder wrote:

Eeerrrrrmmmm, did anything happen with this case?


It's ongoing. The wheels of justice trundle very slowly indeed.
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 06:47 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote;
Quote:
The wheels of justice trundle very slowly indeed.


Heheheh. So they do. Unless you blow your brief at an RBT. You'll be in court within 24 hours.

Unless you have the dough to fob it off for a few years, let the heat die down a little and all.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 07:22 am
@Builder,
It won't die down because Mps like Tom Watson have the bit firmly between their teeth. Jimmy Murdoch has been called back to give evidence because his original testimony contradicts that of other NI executives.
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 07:30 am
@izzythepush,
Who would you pick for the fall guy?

James ?

Or an underling?
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 07:33 am
@Builder,
Well the policy has always been to try and blame someone as low down the organisation as possible, so unless the evidence against Jimmy is overwhelming he'll probably get away with it.

BTW Actor Hugh Grant has been at all the political party conferences trying to keep this in the headlines.
hingehead
 
  2  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 07:38 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
BTW Actor Hugh Grant has been at all the political party conferences trying to keep this in the headlines.


Guessing Hugh won't be starring in any 2oth Century Fox productions any time soon?
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 07:42 am
@hingehead,
Hugh is yesterday's news anyways.

Like Sean Penn, just popping his old head in to keep up appearances.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2011 07:43 am
@hingehead,
Probably not.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Oct, 2011 02:47 am
@izzythepush,
Murdoch corruption spreads to America.


Quote:
Wall Street Journal circulation scam claims senior Murdoch executive

Andrew Langhoff resigns as European publishing chief after exposure of secret channels of cash to help boost sales figures The Wall Street Journal used a controversial scheme to boost its European circulation by allowing sponsors to buy copies in bulk from as little as 1¢. One of Rupert Murdoch's most senior European executives has resigned following Guardian inquiries about a circulation scam at News Corporation's flagship newspaper, the Wall Street Journal.

The Guardian found evidence that the Journal had been channelling money through European companies in order to secretly buy thousands of copies of its own paper at a knock-down rate, misleading readers and advertisers about the Journal's true circulation.

The bizarre scheme included a formal, written contract in which the Journal persuaded one company to co-operate by agreeing to publish articles that promoted its activities, a move which led some staff to accuse the paper's management of violating journalistic ethics and jeopardising its treasured reputation for editorial quality.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/oct/12/wall-street-journal-andrew-langhoff
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Oct, 2011 05:41 am
@izzythepush,
Eeeerm, that is pretty out there, Izzy.

Can't believe this really. Pumping up circulation figures to prop advertising budgets, I can understand, but isn't that a self-defeating system in its own right?

I mean, how long could it go on, really?

I see desperation plastered all over that scenario. Is that just me?
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 11/24/2024 at 10:33:45