1
   

Men are better then women?

 
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Jan, 2004 01:31 am
Eva
Exactly. I've seen it happen far too many times and I just hate seeing good parents take the blame for children who have made bad choices. Hell, I was no angel when I was a kid, in fact I was quite the handful for my parents, but they were wonderful parents and I did settle down in time. My brother was the quiet good boy, while I raised enough hell for the both of us and then some. It wasn't my parents fault that I was the way I was, it was my fault because I rebelled and did what I wanted to do. No matter what, there was nothing my parents could have done differently to change who I wanted to be at the time. Fortunately, I grew out of my wild ways, but I learned a lot of lessons on my own the hard way. If I knew then what I know now, I would have listened to them and made my life a lot easier, but I was lucky enough to learn from my mistakes. I remember telling my parents that their advice was from the old days and that times have changed and my mothers famous last words were "live and learn"! Well, that's exactly what I did. When you have kids it can go either way even if you're the best parents on earth.
0 Replies
 
drom et reve
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jan, 2004 01:26 pm
Cav: I imagined George from Seinfeld too! Well-- that would be a neurotic, if not erotic, union.

Wilso, Eva and Montana: I'm entirely with you on this issue. To me, this is not about gender, but rather about waiving the value of a bond that shouldn't be used as a way of earning publicity. It sickens me to think that someone like Britney could be a rôle model; but the whole obsession with celebrity is particularly sad to me. My idea about people's obsession with celebrity is this: they want to badger around others' lives to forget their own transcience. Sadly enough, children- thinking that the way of Britney or Aguilera is the way to go ('why would they be wrong; after all, they never fail to get dates)- are taken along....




0 Replies
 
BlueMonkey
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jan, 2004 03:59 pm
The age that I think parents have the least bit of hold on their children is 11 though 16. Those are the years from sixth grade to the end of freshmen year. Those are the years that parenting is the hardest. It is where you see if your job was done right.

I know good parents and I know that there are some things that can't be controled. But to play devils advocate having three kids and one has done badly then maybe they did good by two and not one. And even though that might be the mean way of looking at it it might be the right way. Not everyone can be good all the time correct? A writer cannot write a hit every single time they have to have a bomb, right? Then a parent - even a good one - can have two good children and one bad one and still be to blame because that is their child.

Blame on the parent, to me, is no existant at the age of 11 I might give until 13. But when that time comes it is the child making the disisions. And at that age Adult they should be tried as. Unless they were controled by an older figure.

But there is the example of Adam and Eve. God was a perfect parent and his children still went south.
0 Replies
 
Micha
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Jan, 2004 02:30 am
dròm_et_rêve wrote:
Cav: I imagined George from Seinfeld too! Well-- that would be a neurotic, if not erotic, union.

Wilso, Eva and Montana: I'm entirely with you on this issue. To me, this is not about gender, but rather about waiving the value of a bond that shouldn't be used as a way of earning publicity. It sickens me to think that someone like Britney could be a rôle model; but the whole obsession with celebrity is particularly sad to me. My idea about people's obsession with celebrity is this: they want to badger around others' lives to forget their own transcience. Sadly enough, children- thinking that the way of Britney or Aguilera is the way to go ('why would they be wrong; after all, they never fail to get dates)- are taken along....








I agree. The idea of a role model is silly to me, you put someone on a pedastal, and sure enough they do something that is considered to be wrong of judgement, and while it may be --the fact remains to each their own. And for people, because it is easy to pick a part a life that is not their own, to tell them what they should have and should not have done.
Yet their is, an obsession with celebrities and their lives, people want to know, and for young people it's easy to do that, since only one dimension of that life is glamorized.
0 Replies
 
drom et reve
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Jan, 2004 06:51 am
If a parent want a rôle model, they should offer themselves! The sad thing is all these people who starve themselves, leave school, all in the hope of becoming a star... and never make it. I think that the obsession with celebrities is myopic; but then, celebrities have never interested me.




0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Jan, 2004 02:37 pm
dròm_et_rêve wrote:
If a parent want a rôle model, they should offer themselves! The sad thing is all these people who starve themselves, leave school, all in the hope of becoming a star... and never make it. I think that the obsession with celebrities is myopic; but then, celebrities have never interested me.






My thoughts exactly.
0 Replies
 
dragonfly13184
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2004 09:38 pm
what is and what should be
i think we all need to stop complaining about what should be, but instead focus on what is.

the facts.

celebrities are role models for our children today. especially since a lot of the time, parents are away working, or whatever they do.

celebrities, save a few good ones, don't give a rip about our children and are only in it to make money, or sing, or whatever.. it's for themselves and their personal relationships.

celebrities are nothing but heartless rich brats, and they should never be allowed to get away with things by paying their way out. if anything, the law should more strict with them because they ARE role models for our children and when the kids see them raping teenagers and doing drugs, and then GETTING AWAY WITH IT, it doesn't teach anything good to the younger generation.
0 Replies
 
MisterEThoughts
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jan, 2004 04:21 pm
I think that Britney simply has no talent and is not worth to be talked about.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Rockhead's Music Thread - Discussion by Rockhead
What are you listening to right now? - Discussion by Craven de Kere
WA2K Radio is now on the air - Discussion by Letty
Classical anyone? - Discussion by JPB
Ship Ahoy: The O'Jays - Discussion by edgarblythe
Evolutionary purpose of music. - Discussion by jackattack
Just another music thread. - Discussion by msolga
An a2k experiment: What is our favorite song? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
THE DAY THE MUSIC DIED . . . - Discussion by Setanta
Has a Song Ever Made You Cry? - Discussion by Diest TKO
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/28/2024 at 12:02:21