sometimes it just sits there and stuff happens all around it.
0 Replies
joefromchicago
2
Reply
Thu 3 Feb, 2011 10:57 am
@bewildered,
bewildered wrote:
Which is the fact of life for plants/animals, mutual help or warring?
Or, in philosophic terms, who's right: Prince Kropotkin or Herbert Spencer?
0 Replies
Setanta
1
Reply
Thu 3 Feb, 2011 11:54 am
Oooo . . . i'm inspired now . . .
It was Hobbes . . .
During the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that conditions called war; and such a war, as if of every man, against every man.
A professor said there is no god of love, since he sees warring everywhere from the molecular level to the gigantic level. For example, he said black walnut tree roots send out toxic chemicals to weed out almost all other plants near them.
I know no man can live without eating other plants/animals.
I think no plants/animals go extinct because of the toxic chemicals of black walnut trees. Every plant/animal benifit other plants/animals. Doesn't that show mutal help as a rule of life?
I cannot edit my questions now, but I should have phrased my question as:
Does life exist owing to mutual help or warring?
Which is the rule of life for plants/animals, mutual help or warring?