Holocaust Denial is not just a muslim thing.

The Mother of a colleague of mine was certain that the American claims to have reached the moon were obvious bull****: lots of peope feel that way about lots of things. The question here is whether the murder of European Jews can be used to justify the nazi takeover of Palestine. Manifestly it can't, manifestly no Muslim (and no sensible person) believes it can, and manifestly no Muslim killed the European Jews. Denying 'the Holocaust' just cuts out the middle term, wrongly but understandably. Fight racism and colonialism everywhere: there is no problem.

Why fight racism? Everyone is racist. If it weren't for colonialism, there would be no America as we know it.

colonialism =/= racism

Can you define "racism," old sport?

Discrimination or prejudice based on race.

colonialism =/= racism

Colonialists are, by definition, superior to those who are indigenous to the colonized lands, or they wouldn't be able to travel to those lands and colonize them.

And why do you seem to think that is a bad thing?

Do you think the brits were superior to colonial americans?

Because prejudice is an invalid form of evaluation.
No it isn't. You are wrong again. Prove your point, Shlomo.

Why do you think it's a good thing?
Did I say that? Please try to comment on what is actually said, Abie. It is neither good nor bad.

The colonial Americans were superior to the injuns. Try to keep up, old sport.

That's not what i asked.

I said do you thin brits were better than colonial americans?

Thin Brits are probably healthier than fat Brits.

Why do you ask that?

Fatal_Freedoms;69037 wrote:

Because prejudice is an invalid form of evaluation.
No it isn't. You are wrong again. Prove your point, Shlomo.

Prejudice

pre = before

judice = judicial; judgment



Prejudice is when a person forms a conclusion before they have gathered any evidence or information (usually about another person). Therefore these conclusions are unreliable and invalid. They are based on presuppositions.


and therefore any action discrimination based on prejudice is by extension also invalid.

Why do you keep evading the question?

Do you think the Brits were superior to colonial Americans, yes or no?

Josef;69040 wrote:

Fatal_Freedoms;69037 wrote:

Because prejudice is an invalid form of evaluation.
No it isn't. You are wrong again. Prove your point, Shlomo.

Prejudice

pre = before

judice = judicial; judgment



Prejudice is when a person forms a conclusion before they have gathered any evidence or information (usually about another person). Therefore these conclusions are unreliable and invalid. They are based on presuppositions.


and therefore any action discrimination based on prejudice is by extension also invalid.

I base my opinions on experience, old sport, along with facts. Muddies are obviously less than whites. Whatever you are, you make my case. Thanks.

Why do you keep misspelling and asking questions that aren't germane to the subject? What's wrong with you?

Fatal_Freedoms;69056 wrote:

Josef;69040 wrote:

I base my opinions on experience, old sport, along with facts. Muddies are obviously less than whites.

Well perhaps you can show this to me, instead of making bald assertions. What "facts" do you have to support your position?

Quote:

Whatever you are, you make my case. Thanks.

Based on the facts that you can't answer simple questions, you're really in no position to claim superiority to anybody.

And from what I've gathered people who have accomplished very little themselves like to cling to the accomplishments of people like themselves as to make themselves feel better about their lack of achievement.