@Adam Bing,
Adam Bing;47121 wrote:To the three hours of darkness at Jesus' death? Given the solid nature of the proof you have on hand, I am speechless. As I am with the matter of the East Gate Prophecy. No, I have no argument against you.
According to Matthew 27:45-54 When Christ died on the cross from the sixth hour until the ninth hour there was an earth quake and darkness was over all the land. And it was at this time when the centurion said. "Truly this was the Son of God!"
The first reference found outside the Bible to this event came from a historian named Thallus, who wrote around 52 A.D. His history was quoted by another early writer by the name of Julius Africanus who researched the topic of this darkness and wrote the following:
"Upon the whole world there came a most fearful darkness. Many rocks were split in two by an earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were thrown down. It seems very unreasonable to me that Thallus, in the third book of his histories, would try to explain away this darkness as an eclipse of the sun. For the Jews celebrate their Passover on the 14th day according to the moon, and the death of our Saviour falls on the day before the Passover. (But an eclipse of the sun can only take place when the moon comes under the sun?")
Another first century historian who also mentions this darkness was Phlegon, who wrote a history entitled the "Olympiads." Julius Africanus mentioned a quote taken from the Olympiads which said:
"Phlegon records that, in the time of Tiberius Caesar, at full moon, there was a full eclipse of the sun from the sixth hour to the ninth... It is evident that he did not know of any such events in previous years."
Phlegon is also mentioned by Origen in his work ''Against Celsus' Book 2: "The darkening of the sun took place at the time of Tiberius Caesar, in whose reign Jesus was crucified, and the great earthquakes which then took place,
What I find remarkable, is the events that are spoken of in the Bible are confirmed by non Biblical historians. If the Bible is just a myth, why are historians of that day supporting it's claims? The three hours of darkness, the earthquake in Judea, and the fact that the moon was not in the proper position for an eclips to occure. Also Phlegon states in the Olympiads in his thirteenth book that the darkness began at the sixth hour and day was turned to night so that the stars in the heavens were seen, and he also confirms the earthquake. And his time matched the time given in Matthew chapter 27. And again, this was confirmed by non Biblical historians which makes their testimony all the more important.