Absurdities in Religous texts

Plants are made on the third day before there was a sun to drive their photosynthetic processes (1:14-19). 1:11

What is called absurdities, often is called great discoveries. I wonder if you heard about the discovery that the plants can live without sun. My wife told be about it another day, but I didn't do much research on my own.

Photons are required for photosynthesis. There is no getting around this.

Can photons go through cloud cover?

Of course. Although some is lost.

Can photons go through cloud cover?

Light obviously existed since day (time period) one according to scripture. It was just that its sources could not be seen directly from earth due to the cloud cover. This did not stop enough of the photons from getting through the cloud layer to disallow plant life and growth.

If not from the sun, where did these photons come from?

A friend sent me this link, I have broken it down by Religion.

...

Muslim

Absurdity in the Quran

...

2. "Shall we believe as the foolish believe?"
According to the Quran, the answer is, yes. To be truly wise you must believe whatever the foolish believe. 2:13

I believe that the sun existed and that the photons came from the sun but that the sun could not be seen from the Earth because of the cloud cover.

Do you have the confidence to debate/discuss with me the so-called 'Absurdities' in the Noble Quran as stated in this deceiving website -you posted ?

I will just show you an example of the pathetic silly deceptions that website wants you to believe by quoting what they claim to be an absurdity in the Quran:

From your website:


Let us now see what the true verse (2:13) really says:

[13] And when it is said to them (hypocrites): "Believe as the people (followers of Muhammad (peace be upon him)) have believed," they say: "Shall we believe as the fools have believed?" Verily, they are the fools, but they know not.

Now, I leave it to you and to all the honest readers to compare what the true verse says and what the deceiving website tries to let you believe!

so why is the order of creation wrong in the bible?

I believe that it was simplified so that a herdsman from 1500 b.c. could better understand what happened.

By lying to them? If that part was inaccurate what else could be?

Again... Show me the lie or more to my point, the passages which lead to a hurtful and purposeful deception.

Tell me, though, if a mother says to her small child that she is going to have
baby and the baby is growing inside of her "tummy", is she lying to that child because she did not say "uterus" instead of "tummy"?

If the child asks, "how did the baby get there mommy?" and she replies " Daddy lovingly took a seed and planted it there.", is she lying because she did not describe sexual intercourse more accurately to that child?

If the child misunderstands exactly what happened but gets the message of mommy and daddy loving each other and the new baby and the mother further knows that as the child grows that the child will understand the message more clearly, is the mother lying to the child?

In fact, isn't the mother being more clear from the standpoint of the childs ability to understand to use the words "tummy", "plant" and "seed" than to use the words uterus, 'sexual intercourse" and "sperm", even if later on the second set of words would be more accurate and precise for the grown child?

Again... Show me the lie or more to my point, the passages which lead to a hurtful and purposeful deception.

Tell me, though, if a mother says to her small child that she is going to have
baby and the baby is growing inside of her "tummy", is she lying to that child because she did not say "uterus" instead of "tummy"?

If the child asks, "how did the baby get there mommy?" and she replies " Daddy lovingly took a seed and planted it there.", is she lying because she did not describe sexual intercourse more accurately to that child?

If the child misunderstands exactly what happened but gets the message of mommy and daddy loving each other and the new baby and the mother further knows that as the child grows that the child will understand the message more clearly, is the mother lying to the child?

In fact, isn't the mother being more clear from the standpoint of the childs ability to understand to use the words "tummy", "plant" and "seed" than to use the words uterus, 'sexual intercourse" and "sperm", even if later on the second set of words would be more accurate and precise for the grown child?

The bible says the earth was created before the sun and the stars, how is this not deception?

in the example you gave it would be lying if the mother said that she gave birth before she was pregnant. Giving things out of order, is lying.

Generally the people who preach and are attned services are adults. do you not think they are able the understand the 'truth' then?