@manored,
manored;166125 wrote:It is speaking about humans, it applies to humans, And I, being human, am, off course, in these verses.
I think these verses are too negative. Specially then they mention that in the past humans were better. I do not think so, in the past, humans were even worse, so much that they were even less able to see that =)
But I agree that humans are "bound" by several negative ideas that limit their freedom and their ability to be happy. I think philosopy is what freeds one from those chains.
As a generalization obviously we all can fit the picture, but some just fit it perfectly, while others came as far cry...
...personally I don?t have a problem with greed, will to power, and self esteem, or even with other normally biased and wrongly connoted adjectives, but only with stupidity and the subsequent lack of balance !
...The very same kind of stupidity, which separates the cerebellum from the cortex, and the inferior, individualistic, and instantly gratified reptiles behaviour, from social superior species, as usually are most of the mammals...or so I use to think...
Necessarily, its only fair common sense to agree with the above portrayed description, but nevertheless, and if not to a linear approach, one should be cautious with the remedy's and the recipe for the cure.
I?m all in favour of Darwinism and competition, no doubt on that... and still, also all in favour, of empathy, cooperation, and equilibrium !
A la Star Trek Spock style, "Live long and prosper" Mark Noble, see you in the Delta quadrant !