@littlek,
I just read the article again, paying close attention to what it seeks to explain and how it explains it. As I understand what I've read, the beginning of life is very much the question. Here is how the article starts:
NPR wrote:Is the "primordial soup" theory " the idea that life emerged from a prebiotic broth " past its expiration date? (emphasis added -- T.)
NPR answers this question as follows:
NPR wrote:Lane's team proposes that deep-sea, alkaline hydrothermal vents powered life's predecessors.
But what do the vents power the predecessors to do? And how does Lane suggest life emerged from these inorganic predecessor cells? Sure, it's nice for life to have cells. But there's nothing
in Lane's cells because he leapfrogs over two entire levels of organization. First, he bypasses amino acids, nucleotides, and all that. Second, he bypasses proteins and viruses. It's cells from the very beginning. That would be fine if Lane
then explained how these lower levels of organization emerge from inorganic cells with energy. But he doesn't. I'm sure these inorganic cells are fascinating objects to study in their own right. But I can't see their connection with life that this article suggests.
This is quite possibly my fault. I'm not arguing with you -- just trying to figure out how this theory works.