@jjorge,
jjorge wrote:The CONSTITUTION did not make the nonsensical assertions that:
1. corporations are "persons"
...and...
2. that money is "speech".
It was the Supreme Court --a branch of the GOVERNMENT, by the way-- that did so.
That is accurate.
jjorge wrote:...AND (I repeat) it was the RADICAL REPUBLICAN MAJORITY of the current court
That is a foolish thing to say; harmless, but foolish and very inaccurate.
If u like to use the language of the commies, thay r "reactionary" --
reacting to the subversion of the McCain-F. law.
The USSC simply did its job in defending the Bill of Rights
against the liberal
USURPATION of 2002,
correctly restoring the
status quo ante, from the founding
of the Republic until McCain ' s disloyalty of 2002, as the USSC was
supposed to do. That 's its job.
That law, the MF law, which
raped the First Amendment
4 different ways, was
facially unconstitutional;
OBVIOUS. Congress has no power
to restrain speech for 2 months;
THAT was the radical outrage.
Were u as vocal in protesting
THAT radicalism ?? Were u?
jjorge wrote:that has now pushed those dubious doctrines to
the point of absurdity with a ruling that in effect renders corporations
"SUPER-PERSONS" --capable of drowning out the voices of millions of REAL
persons in a Tsunami of dollars!
Its an illusion; it was not that way before McCain-F. in 2001.
George Soros tried to use his billion$$ to defeat
W; how well did
THAT work?
Did Soros' efforts control how
YOU voted?
Soros did not stop
ME.
David