@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
Burgess was operating under the assumption that in the future, Russia and the Russian language would assume a greater importance. It was, of course, piss poor prognostication.
Quite right. Burgess of course wasn't the only writer of that time-frame to think this. (
Cf. Orwell.) Even so right-wing an American libertarian as Robert Heinlein speculated that the Russian influence would be huge in the speculative future. In
The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, for example, wives are referred to as
gaspozhas, which, of course, is the Russian for 'wife.'
The literati of the mid-20th century were all unduly impressed with Russia and most everything Russian. This was partly out of admiration, but mostly due to unwarranted fear.