@Setanta,
												Setanta wrote:
Burgess was operating under the assumption that in the future, Russia and the Russian language would assume a greater importance.  It was, of course, piss poor prognostication.
 
Quite right.  Burgess of course wasn't the only writer of that time-frame to think this.  (
Cf. Orwell.)  Even so right-wing an American libertarian as Robert Heinlein speculated that the Russian influence would be huge in the speculative future.  In 
The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, for example, wives are referred to as 
gaspozhas, which, of course, is the Russian for 'wife.'  
The literati of the mid-20th century were all unduly impressed with Russia and most everything Russian.  This was partly out of admiration, but mostly due to unwarranted fear.