@djjd62,
Quote:The Academic Performance Index, the central measuring tool for California schools, rates schools on a scale from zero to 1,000, based on standardized test scores.[/[/i]quote] The state target is an API of 800. The statewide average for middle and high schools is below 750. For schools with mostly low-income students, it is around 650.
The oldest of the American Indian schools, the middle school known simply as American Indian Public Charter School, has an API of 967. Its two siblings -- American Indian Public Charter School II (also a middle school) and American Indian Public High School -- are not far behind.
Among the thousands of public schools in California, only four middle schools and three high schools score higher. None of them serves mostly underprivileged children.
If California is anything like North Carolina - each student has to take an EOCT (end of course test) in every major subject area. I would think that Biology and/or Chemistry would be mandated - maybe not Geology- although Earth Science was a prerequisite for higher level sciences in the school I taught in.
Even if the standardized tests they're talking about are simply for reading and math (which may be true), how can you knock those scores?
Doesn't sound like they're turning out very many illiterates.
I think results like these should be applauded instead of automatically denigrated. They're obviously doing something right. If these kids want to learn about evolution - and their particular highschool curriculum was light on that (my public highschool was - we didn't do Creationism either though) maybe they can take courses in college- which they're obviously prepared for (unlike many public school students who attend four years of highschool and can't read or write to a fourth grade level).
Congratulations to the students...and to the people in the schools who figured out how to help them be successful (if they needed any help - maybe they're just way smart, disciplined and determined kids).
I say hurray!
(I make my daughter scrub the toilet (and her brother uses it- I guess that makes it a 'boy's' toilet).
*my son also scrubs the toilet (and his sister uses it - so I guess that means I make the boys scrub the girl's toilet too).
I think it's good for kids to learn how to work- who the hell do they expect is gonna scrub their toilet if they don't know how to?