0
   

Ultimate School Candidate

 
 
Reply Sun 31 May, 2009 05:37 pm
http://patriotroom.com/article/the-most-awesomely-awesome-school-ever

Quote:

From the L.A. Times.

Quote:
Not many schools in California recruit teachers with language like this: "We are looking for hard working people who believe in free market capitalism. . . . Multicultural specialists, ultra liberal zealots and college-tainted oppression liberators need not apply."

That, it turns out, is just the beginning of the ways in which American Indian Public Charter and its two sibling schools spit in the eye of mainstream education. . . .

School administrators take pride in their record of frequently firing teachers they consider to be underperforming. Unions are embraced with the same warmth accorded "self-esteem experts, panhandlers, drug dealers and those snapping turtles who refuse to put forth their best effort," to quote the school's website.

Students, almost all poor, wear uniforms and are subject to disciplinary procedures redolent of military school. One local school district official was horrified to learn that a girl was forced to clean the boys' restroom as punishment.


And how well does it work? How does Top 10 in the state sound?

Quote:
The Academic Performance Index, the central measuring tool for California schools, rates schools on a scale from zero to 1,000, based on standardized test scores. The state target is an API of 800. The statewide average for middle and high schools is below 750. For schools with mostly low-income students, it is around 650.

The oldest of the American Indian schools, the middle school known simply as American Indian Public Charter School, has an API of 967. Its two siblings -- American Indian Public Charter School II (also a middle school) and American Indian Public High School -- are not far behind.

Among the thousands of public schools in California, only four middle schools and three high schools score higher. None of them serves mostly underprivileged children.


The rest of the article tries to tear down the school (it is the L.A. Times, lest we forget) for not having enough computers or lab equipment and for being so strict with the students for minor infractions. They "forget" to mention the fact that if money produced better students, the District of Columbia public schools would be pumping out dozens of future Rhodes Scholars every year. This little school of conservative, capitalist, America-centered education tells the liberals in the public schools to piss-off, and then crushes them in student scores.

What's not to like?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 667 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 May, 2009 07:54 pm
I enjoy reading straightforward, unbiased news like this.
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 May, 2009 07:58 pm
and i bet they don't teach any of that evolution crap either
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 Jun, 2009 01:09 am
@djjd62,
Quote:
The Academic Performance Index, the central measuring tool for California schools, rates schools on a scale from zero to 1,000, based on standardized test scores.[/[/i]quote] The state target is an API of 800. The statewide average for middle and high schools is below 750. For schools with mostly low-income students, it is around 650.

The oldest of the American Indian schools, the middle school known simply as American Indian Public Charter School, has an API of 967. Its two siblings -- American Indian Public Charter School II (also a middle school) and American Indian Public High School -- are not far behind.

Among the thousands of public schools in California, only four middle schools and three high schools score higher. None of them serves mostly underprivileged children.


If California is anything like North Carolina - each student has to take an EOCT (end of course test) in every major subject area. I would think that Biology and/or Chemistry would be mandated - maybe not Geology- although Earth Science was a prerequisite for higher level sciences in the school I taught in.

Even if the standardized tests they're talking about are simply for reading and math (which may be true), how can you knock those scores?
Doesn't sound like they're turning out very many illiterates.

I think results like these should be applauded instead of automatically denigrated. They're obviously doing something right. If these kids want to learn about evolution - and their particular highschool curriculum was light on that (my public highschool was - we didn't do Creationism either though) maybe they can take courses in college- which they're obviously prepared for (unlike many public school students who attend four years of highschool and can't read or write to a fourth grade level).

Congratulations to the students...and to the people in the schools who figured out how to help them be successful (if they needed any help - maybe they're just way smart, disciplined and determined kids).

I say hurray!

(I make my daughter scrub the toilet (and her brother uses it- I guess that makes it a 'boy's' toilet).
*my son also scrubs the toilet (and his sister uses it - so I guess that means I make the boys scrub the girl's toilet too).
I think it's good for kids to learn how to work- who the hell do they expect is gonna scrub their toilet if they don't know how to?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Kid wouldn't fight, died of injuries - Discussion by gungasnake
Public school zero tolerance policies. - Question by boomerang
Dismantling the DC voucher program - Discussion by gungasnake
Adventures in Special Education - Discussion by littlek
home schooling - Discussion by dancerdoll
Can I get into an Ivy League? - Question by the-lazy-snail
Let's start an education forum - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Educational resources on the cheap - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Ultimate School Candidate
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 07:28:26