10
   

Give me art assignments

 
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Feb, 2011 08:52 pm
@farmerman,
I like mud.

See whatsisname.

(back when I find it)

Ah, Russell Chatham. Not the poster stuff on line, but his hundred paintings book.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Feb, 2011 10:08 pm
@sozobe,
I realize, Sozobe, that my advice to you has value only or mainly regarding the kind of art--non-representational--I do.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Feb, 2011 10:14 pm
@JLNobody,
Let's all talk with JL. Can we get a conversation going?

Hi, John. Give us a kick start to argue about..
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 Feb, 2011 04:24 pm
@ossobuco,
Well, I was just looking at some reproductions of figure paintings of the likes of Alice Neel, Richard Diebenkorn, Rufino Tamayo, and , of course, Pablo Picasso, and I marvel at their level of inventiveness and independence. It's the way they create shapes and forms that one does not see in nature, thus making their "representations" more than efforts at copying things. While I enjoy much of the work of painters who "reproduce" for us beautiful things found in nature (like that of O'Keefe) I enjoy more the total fabrications of works like those mentioned above (and sometimes O'Keefe is one of them), and I would prefer to create "beauty" from scratch--one day I'll succeed. So it's not just a questions of abstract vs. representational art; it's still, as far as I'm concerned, a matter of presenting realities vs. representing realities. What do you think?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Painting with a difference - Discussion by ossobuco
Van Gogh's Ear - Discussion by ossobuco
Flower Porn! - Discussion by tsarstepan
need help figuring out who this is - Question by shannon5
Name of painting based on description? - Question by spookygirl
Identifying painting Hortense Mancini - Question by Manciniloverz34
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/21/2021 at 10:27:27