Marriage Is for White People

Quote:

Also, women have biological clocks, so their getting married, in the childbearing years, is a race against time, and a race against the competition of the next younger group of women entering the marriage market...

The whole country is looking at that one the wrong way and if we don't come up with an answer to it, we're in for a world of trouble.

The problem to my thinking is simple: humans are biologically programmed and constructed to start having children and familes at 16 - 20 and not at 35 - 40. For America to ever prosper again as I see it, it has to again become respectable and normal for Americans to marry at 16 - 20. If that involves some form of welfare, all I can say is I'd rather have that than 20,000,000 illegal aliens walking around taking up the slack.

'Im reluctant to believe that marriage and commitment are mutually exclusive.

a point that is illustrated by all the unmarried couples we know who are committed to each other, or conversely all the married couples we know who are not.

BUT, we are not looking at a situation were blacks are together but without papers, we are looking at female lead home where men are transient, if they are around at all.

The same regs applied to food stamps, but I'm not sure what the current regs are.

along the same lines there was a case in the press last week where a father/husband was found to be abusing one or more of the kids, the court ordered that he not have any contact with the kids, and that he have no contact with his wife at all either. The fear was that he would manipulate his wife into allowing contact with the kids against the will of the court , there for the court was justified in cutting him off from his wife also.

I am a socialist, but I agree with the wing-nuts that the courts are increasingly out of control.

Moreover, the court said, limiting Warren's marriage rights was reasonably necessary to achieve the compelling state interest of protecting the girls and their mother.

The majority acknowledged that Washington courts "have been reluctant to uphold no-contact orders with classes of persons different from the victim of the crime."

The court also pointed out that sentences which infringe on a fundamental right - such as the right to marriage - must be drawn narrowly: "There must be no reasonable alternative way to achieve the state's interest."

Tailoring its decision closely to the case at hand, the court said that "under these unique facts" it could approve the no-contact order applying to Warren's wife.

What ever happened to marrying for love?

The biggest thing society needs is not to have a distinction between a black community and a white community. Should just be a community of people!

along the same lines there was a case in the press last week where a father/husband was found to be abusing one or more of the kids, the court ordered that he not have any contact with the kids, and that he have no contact with his wife at all either. The fear was that he would manipulate his wife into allowing contact with the kids against the will of the court , there for the court was justified in cutting him off from his wife also.

I am a socialist, but I agree with the wing-nuts that the courts are increasingly out of control.

Quote:

The biggest thing society needs is not to have a distinction between a black community and a white community. Should just be a community of people!

Amen.

The entire article addresses marriage as if we only marry people of our own race. I'm not impressed with it's observation or incite.

Typical
K
O