Quote:Multiple axiomatic systems can derive the same sets of theorems, or entirely different ones.
That goes without saying, though I would add that this is conditional on its strength (consistency) and scope (applicability). Also, if we are speaking of other civilizations and their capacity to derive either the same or highly advanced theorems and other deductions about the world- and it seems that my initial question has come to this- I would say that the object of study here would be the same and only the degrees would differ: the natural world and the systems created through the study of it via logic, mathematics, engineering, medicine (biochemistry) etc. This is to say that though the perspective and degree of intelligence may differ from our own, I would think that any axiomatic system from an intelligence in
this universe would be founded on its surroundings (the state of affairs in its natural world) and then propagated via its understanding of the method by which it derives advanced systems.
So though it is true that multiple axiomatic systems may or may not derive entirely different theorems (given), it would seem that only the degree of understanding and thus its "axiomatic scope" would differ between civs in this universe; the object of study would differ only given the degree of its understanding- of comprehending it. Our tools used to learn about this or that in the world may be weaker or stronger than those used by others, and so studying the same thing may yield different results.
But what of the original question: is this universe a single set (though expanding and contracting- as if a living entity), or does it comprise several or many? I once glanced over an article that stated quantum physics views the universe as creating (and eliminating) "sub-universes" of all sorts and all the time.