Not Created/Formed, Destroyed, or Not Yet Created/Formed

Forums: Science And Math
Email this Topic • Print this Page

If you noticed cetian things have opposites.

Is it possible that the things that dont have opposites currently:

A) had opposites at some point long ago that didnt make it in mother nature for us humans to get to see those very opposites?

B) would have opposites but they didnt get to be put in the forming of this planet called Earth to why everything doesnt have an opposite?

C) shall have opposites at some point at the right moment?

Think about this... The opposite for a lime is a lemon. Even the colors are opposite on them. Anyway, that's a double. There are things with three opposites such as the apple. You have the red apple, the yellow apple, and the green apple. They taste opposite each other in that they surely dont taste the same. Two of them have acceptable opposite colors...the green and the yellow apple. Is there a missing blue apple to be opposite the red apple? Or is red's other opposite green?

But what's the opposite of a carat, a pinnapple, and also certain colors (such as purple)? Something in mother nature is missing. It's up to us to figure it all out in this new science I coin as "Missology". The whole basis thread to Missology lies on a theory that every single thing that seems to not have an opposite has an opposite in the grand cosmic design that is just missing from the scene that's in man's eyes. For all we know a blue apple could have formed on another planet. Or, it's seed, so to speak, with the blue print to forming it, lies in, say, Mars, waiting to be replanted by man to here on earth so that it can then form indeed under the conditions right for life.

The right conditions may not be right on other planets that do hold things in wait that are not formed here on earth currenly which could turn out to only form here on earth if we see to it, you know?

Anyway, what do you think of Missology getting recognized as a new science in the science world? Should it even be a science?

It would give NASA something to do such as replant the ingredience of possible things of life and non-life from other planets and moons to here on earth to mix with things of earth to see what shall become. Hell, the cure for a certain disease could be a plant not yet formed on some other planet which we would have to bring here to cause to form with natural earth addatives. Show an alien ingredient a lil earthly love and a lot could happen, wouldnt you think?

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 766 • Replies: 4

No top replies

Re: Not Created/Formed, Destroyed, or Not Yet Created/Formed

Busma wrote:

If you noticed cetian things have opposites.

"Cetian" things? Is this a corruption of cetacean? Are you referring to pelagic mammals?

Quote:

Think about this... The opposite for a lime is a lemon.

Bullshit--they're both citrus fruits, and they both contain significant amounts of acetic acid and ascorbic acid. You're must makin' this **** up now, ain't ya?

Quote:

Even the colors are opposite on them.

Bullshit--yellow is a primary color, and green is a combination of the two primary colors, yellow and blue. Now i know you're just makin' this **** up.

Quote:

Anyway, that's a double. There are things with three opposites such as the apple. You have the red apple, the yellow apple, and the green apple. They taste opposite each other in that they surely dont taste the same. Two of them have acceptable opposite colors...the green and the yellow apple. Is there a missing blue apple to be opposite the red apple? Or is red's other opposite green?

But what's the opposite of a carat, a pinnapple, and also certain colors (such as purple)? Something in mother nature is missing. It's up to us to figure it all out in this new science I coin as "Missology". The whole basis thread to Missology lies on a theory that every single thing that seems to not have an opposite has an opposite in the grand cosmic design that is just missing from the scene that's in man's eyes. For all we know a blue apple could have formed on another planet. Or, it's seed, so to speak, with the blue print to forming it, lies in, say, Mars, waiting to be replanted by man to here on earth so that it can then form indeed under the conditions right for life.

The right conditions may not be right on other planets that do hold things in wait that are not formed here on earth currenly which could turn out to only form here on earth if we see to it, you know?

Anyway, what do you think of Missology getting recognized as a new science in the science world? Should it even be a science?

It would give NASA something to do such as replant the ingredience of possible things of life and non-life from other planets and moons to here on earth to mix with things of earth to see what shall become. Hell, the cure for a certain disease could be a plant not yet formed on some other planet which we would have to bring here to cause to form with natural earth addatives. Show an alien ingredient a lil earthly love and a lot could happen, wouldnt you think?

Are you on drugs?

Are you merely self-deluded to an extraordinary degree?

Maybe you're just stupid.

Whatever the case, learning to use spell-check and getting out of the house more often couldn't hurt.

0 Replies

To each who may read:

You must know that there are basics and are specifics. Something may be similar in basics, but different in specifics. The specifics being opposite is what makes something opposite in like what is called a context. If we go by the basics, then you could easily say humans are opposite rocks. In another general sense you have anything living the opposite anything non-living. There must be a line drawn and a balance in what one is getting at in opposites, I see. Well you should be able to tell I'm dealing with opposite specifics to their similar basics.

Bright (me) is the opposite to dull (you) concerning a matter in understanding specifics from basics.

The opposite of existence is not what this thread is getting into, simple minded ppl.

Have a sense for working with the context of principles.

Also note this:

Light color (non-matter) and material color (matter) may have there differences in what might be their opposites. Surely a yellow lemon is the opposite in color to a green lime. Mother nature surely has different opposites for different things (matter and also non-matter).

So using light's color spectrum on material matter color wont fly in this thread. It's way understandable after the ego is dropped of course.

0 Replies

Busma, by your definition, everything has an opposite. Draw a line between carrots and trees, and you'll find that they're opposite eachother. Believe it or not, everything in the universe isn't necessarily balanced according to your notion of balance.

0 Replies

It's primitive dualism, and a not very bright version of it, either. But that kind of thinking has dominated christianity for the last many centuries, so no one should be surprised.

0 Replies

Not Created/Formed, Destroyed, or Not Yet Created/Formed

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know