1
   

How will our universe end? The Big Rip

 
 
Reply Sun 21 Oct, 2007 09:20 am
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0710/puzzle_cook.jpg

How will our universe end? Recent speculation now includes a pervasive growing field of mysterious repulsive phantom energy that rips virtually everything apart. Although the universe started with a Big Bang, analysis of cosmological measurements allows a possibility that it will end with a Big Rip. As soon as few billion years from now, the controversial scenario holds, dark energy will grow to such a magnitude that our own Galaxy will no longer be able to hold itself together. After that, stars, planets, and then even atoms might not be able to withstand the expansive internal force. Previously, speculation on the ultimate fate of the universe centered on either a re-collapsing Big Crunch or a Big Freeze. Although the universe's fate is still a puzzle, piecing it together will likely follow from an increased understanding of the nature of dark matter and dark energy.

Phantom Energy and Cosmic Doomsday
Authors: Robert R. Caldwell, Marc Kamionkowski, Nevin N. Weinberg
Submitted on 25 Feb 2003

Abstract: Cosmologists have long wondered whether the Universe will eventually re-collapse and end with a Big Crunch, or expand forever, becoming increasingly cold and empty. Recent evidence for a flat Universe, possibly with a cosmological constant or some other sort of negative-pressure dark energy, has suggested that our fate is the latter. However, the data may actually be pointing toward an astonishingly different cosmic end game. Here, we explore the consequences that follow if the dark energy is phantom energy, in which the sum of the pressure and energy density is negative. The positive phantom-energy density becomes infinite in finite time, overcoming all other forms of matter, such that the gravitational repulsion rapidly brings our brief epoch of cosmic structure to a close. The phantom energy rips apart the Milky Way, solar system, Earth, and ultimately the molecules, atoms, nuclei, and nucleons of which we are composed, before the death of the Universe in a ``Big Rip''.

Title: Is the universe inflating? Dark energy and the future of the universe
Authors: Huterer, Dragan; Starkman, Glenn D.; Trodden, Mark

Abstract

We consider the fate of the observable universe in the light of the discovery of a dark energy component to the cosmic energy budget. We extend results for a cosmological constant to a general dark energy component and examine the constraints on phenomena that may prevent the eternal acceleration of our patch of the universe. We find that the period of accelerated cosmic expansion has not lasted long enough for observations to confirm that we are undergoing inflation; such an observation will be possible when the dark energy density has risen to between 90% and 95% of the critical. The best we can do is make cosmological observations in order to verify the continued presence of dark energy to some high redshift. Having done that, the only possibility that could spoil the conclusion that we are inflating would be the existence of a disturbance (the surface of a true vacuum bubble, for example) that is moving toward us with sufficiently high velocity, but is too far away to be currently observable. Such a disturbance would have to move toward us with speed greater than about 0.8c in order to spoil the late-time inflation of our patch of the universe and yet avoid being detectable.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 791 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
g day
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Nov, 2007 04:54 pm
So the sky is falling - or rather ripping apart, or rather in billions of year may rip apart...

This is all predicated on as yet well incomplete examination of a phenomenon that we don't understand today and call a force. It may not be a force - it may be well be an aspect of the underlying geometry of space time itself we are pondering. Imagine the Universe is actually scale invariant (fractal at all levels) - then your conclusions all change, same goes for the models under MOND.

Personally I would say our models of relaity have a long way to go before we can confidentally predict outcomes on any objects of greater than galactic structure. The physics of the space time between galaxies still has us scratching for answers, and there is more space than there is matter or energy in space time. Until we definitely have a handle on what looks at a macro level to be empty space (and at a quantum level - a foaming riot or real and virtual particles that don't come close to obeying relativity) - I'd say all speculations are pretty permature - like betting on the major future life circumstances of a new born baby.

We suppose this unknown force may have growing importance in its supposed interaction with the fabric of space-time.

Hate to tell you but there are far more known's and probably many more unknowns that can get you before then!
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Nov, 2007 08:53 am
g---day
g---day, when I read this, and not being a scholar, I wondered if the ripping apart could be caused by "our" universe colliding with another universe, just as galaxies collide with other galaxies?

BBB
0 Replies
 
g day
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Nov, 2007 11:59 pm
I would say in all honesty we don't have a decent enough framework to do other than to purely spectulate.

We can propose many alternate models, and we aware inconsistencies of our models when you look at either:

1) particle / particle interactions - when you get to atomic level structures or smaller (ask a physicist how the four fundamental forces work when two atoms close to within distances smaller than the size of an atom) - it all breaks down.

2) structure at galactic or larger size, epsecially those seperated by large tracks of "empty space", incurring effects of the "expansion" of space time.

Personally we know space time and energy / matter interact in normal and at times "exotic ways" (see points 1 and 2) above. I hold that these cases of unusual things happening imply there are more complexities to what is reality and we are seeing something indicating the fundamental geometry of space time itself is a variant - one we don't understand nor have modelled correctly yet.

Without a complete model we can mis-interpret science and jump to extreme conclusions.

BBB - anything is possible until we nail down what is reality, we can't validate it or reject it until our models move forward quite a way still - maybe in our lifetimes, maybe alot longer...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Evolution 101 - Discussion by gungasnake
Typing Equations on a PC - Discussion by Brandon9000
The Future of Artificial Intelligence - Discussion by Brandon9000
The well known Mind vs Brain. - Discussion by crayon851
Scientists Offer Proof of 'Dark Matter' - Discussion by oralloy
Blue Saturn - Discussion by oralloy
Bald Eagle-DDT Myth Still Flying High - Discussion by gungasnake
DDT: A Weapon of Mass Survival - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » How will our universe end? The Big Rip
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/06/2024 at 08:05:58