4
   

Che Guavara...forty years on.

 
 
dlowan
 
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 02:55 am
Che is one of those ubiquitous 20th century icons...at least of a certain kind of fashion.


Speaking of that iconic image:

http://www.eplakaty.pl/img/towary/3115.jpg

I was very interested to read this, in the New Statesman:


"I worked over the image for several days," Honeyman wrote, "but couldn't seem to get the same idealistic gleam in Che's eyes. I finally compared the first Che with the second, and discovered that some canny designer, presumably at [the original Italian printers], had made Che slimmer and his face longer, by about one-sixth. It was so effective that I, too, stretched him, and it worked like a charm. It doesn't really do to have a revolutionary who's too plump."

There is something fitting about the world's most iconic revolutionary image having been manipulated. Che's legacy, 40 years after his death in a failed attempt to ignite revolution in Bolivia, rests heavily on an image so powerful and so plastic that it still serves both as a generalised inspiration to rebel and as a vehicle for the sale of everything from ashtrays to T-shirts.............



Full article



Less stretched Che:

http://www.radikal.com.tr/veriler/2006/03/18/10.gif



I have never really studied him....he was killed when I was a kid, albeit a kid interested in politics, and I remember being very fascinated at the stories of his death, and the photo from Bolivia of the dead man...and saddened.

However, I have always been supremely irrritated at the Che as obligatory wall poster in left wing homes thing, or the t shirts etc. God help us, one of the kids in our group was called Che (he clearly doesn't mind...he has just called his new son Ridley after Ridley Scott...but I thought it was awful.)



I would be very interested in informed views about the man and his achievements and legacy, if any.





Here are some opposing views:



The Cult of Che
Don't applaud The Motorcycle Diaries.
By Paul Berman
Posted Friday, Sept. 24, 2004, at 7:33 AM ET

Portrait of the insurgent as a young man

The cult of Ernesto Che Guevara is an episode in the moral callousness of our time. Che was a totalitarian. He achieved nothing but disaster. Many of the early leaders of the Cuban Revolution favored a democratic or democratic-socialist direction for the new Cuba. But Che was a mainstay of the hardline pro-Soviet faction, and his faction won. Che presided over the Cuban Revolution's first firing squads. He founded Cuba's "labor camp" system—the system that was eventually employed to incarcerate gays, dissidents, and AIDS victims. To get himself killed, and to get a lot of other people killed, was central to Che's imagination. In the famous essay in which he issued his ringing call for "two, three, many Vietnams," he also spoke about martyrdom and managed to compose a number of chilling phrases: "Hatred as an element of struggle; unbending hatred for the enemy, which pushes a human being beyond his natural limitations, making him into an effective, violent, selective, and cold-blooded killing machine. This is what our soldiers must become …"— and so on. He was killed in Bolivia in 1967, leading a guerrilla movement that had failed to enlist a single Bolivian peasant. And yet he succeeded in inspiring tens of thousands of middle class Latin-Americans to exit the universities and organize guerrilla insurgencies of their own. And these insurgencies likewise accomplished nothing, except to bring about the death of hundreds of thousands, and to set back the cause of Latin-American democracy—a tragedy on the hugest scale.

The present-day cult of Che—the T-shirts, the bars, the posters—has succeeded in obscuring this dreadful reality...........




Article in full






Brief bio




This from Time:


Che Guevara
Though communism may have lost its fire, he remains the potent symbol of rebellion and the alluring zeal of revolution
By ARIEL DORFMAN


Monday, June 14, 1999
By the time Ernesto Guevara, known to us as Che, was murdered in the jungles of Bolivia in October 1967, he was already a legend to my generation, not only in Latin America but also around the world.


Like so many epics, the story of the obscure Argentine doctor who abandoned his profession and his native land to pursue the emancipation of the poor of the earth began with a voyage. In 1956, along with Fidel Castro and a handful of others, he had crossed the Caribbean in the rickety yacht Granma on the mad mission of invading Cuba and overthrowing the dictator Fulgencio Batista. Landing in a hostile swamp, losing most of their contingent, the survivors fought their way to the Sierra Maestra. A bit over two years later, after a guerrilla campaign in which Guevara displayed such outrageous bravery and skill that he was named comandante, the insurgents entered Havana and launched what was to become the first and only victorious socialist revolution in the Americas. The images were thereafter invariably gigantic. Che the titan standing up to the Yanquis, the world's dominant power. Che the moral guru proclaiming that a New Man, no ego and all ferocious love for the other, had to be forcibly created out of the ruins of the old one. Che the romantic mysteriously leaving the revolution to continue, sick though he might be with asthma, the struggle against oppression and tyranny.....



Time article






No doubt I could find endless earnestly written hagiographies, but I won't.


What do people who have taken time to find out about and think about him think of him?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 4 • Views: 25,686 • Replies: 119

 
nimh
 
  3  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 01:12 pm
Re: Che Guavara...forty years on.
dlowan wrote:
I would be very interested in informed views about the man and his achievements and legacy, if any.

I was very impressed by the article by Alvaro Vargas Llosa (the son of Mario) below.

Like I wrote in an earlier thread about Che Guevara, reality and myth,

"For me the following article was an absolute eye-opener.

First, it fillets the visible postmodern reduction of "Che" into what is, in effect, merely an extraordinarily successful market brand. A feel-good product for the young and rebellious. A pre-fab idealistic dream; an instant badge of revolutionary street cred. This part may make you laugh. In recognition; and at the surrealness of it.

But then, having wrapped off the countercultural commerce of Che as icon, it also digs into the actual historical record. To recount the rather more sordid story of who "Che" also was. Because filmic sketches of the man's soul are fine -- but what did he mean to those who lived under his actions?

The filmic and biographic portraits of Che seem to almost portray him in a vacuum; an individual soul, a romantic one-man story. But Che held real power. The Cubans and others who had to suffer his idealism are strangely absent in the iconic version of Che. This author puts them back into the spotlight.

This article is very long, and doesnt always make for comfortable reading. But it should be an obligatory read for anyone ever caught wearing a "Che" t-shirt.

Seriously.

Dont be mistaken about the ironic birds' eye view of Che-the-icon in the beginning of the article. The rage of the author is real - and very well-informed. It is not that of just another reactionary, either - note the very last section. It is that of one who sees history and fashion reward bloody zealots, and forget those who fought tyrants without killing a fly, and actually achieved results. Because those gentle reformers are so much less glamorous than your failed, bloodthirsty revolutionary.

You can still love the myth if you will. But before you put on the shirt, know about the politics behind it."

Quote:
Alvaro Vargas Llosa

The Killing Machine

Che Guevara, from communist firebrand to capitalist brand.

THE NEW REPUBLIC -- JULY 1 1 & 18, 2005


Che Guevara, who did so much (or was it so little?) to destroy capitalism, is now a quintessential capitalist brand. His likeness adorns mugs, hoodies, lighters, key chains, wallets, baseball caps, toques, bandannas, tank tops, club shirts, couture bags, denim jeans, herbal tea, and of course those omnipresent T-shirts with the photograph, taken by Alberto Korda, of the socialist heartthrob in his beret during the early years of the revolution, as Che happened to walk into the photographer's viewfinder?- and into the image that, thirty-eight years after his death, is still the logo of revolutionary (or is it capitalist?) chic. Sean O'Hagan claimed in The Observer that there is even a soap powder with the slogan "Che washes whiter."

Che products are marketed by big corporations and small businesses, such as the Burlington Coat Factory, which put out a television commercial depicting a youth in fatigue pants wearing a Che Tshirt, or Flamingo's Boutique in Union City, New Jersey, whose owner responded to the fury of local Cuban exiles with this devastating argument: "I sell whatever people want to buy." Revolutionaries join the merchandising frenzy, too?-from "The Che Store," catering to "all your revolutionary needs" on the Internet, to the Italian writer Gianni Minà, who sold Robert Redford the movie rights to Che's diary of his juvenile trip around South America in 1952 in exchange for access to the shooting of the film The Motorcycle Diaries so that Minà could produce his own documentary. Not to mention Alberto Granado, who accompanied Che on his youthful trip and advises documentarists, and now complains in Madrid, according to El País, over Rioja wine and duck magret, that the American embargo against Cuba makes it hard for him to collect royalties. To take the irony further: the building where Guevara was born in Rosario, Argentina, a splendid early twentiethcentury edifice at the corner of Urquiza and Entre Ríos Streets, was until recently occupied by the private pension fund AFJP Máxima, a child of Argentina's privatization of social security in the 1990s.

------------------------

Alvaro Vargas Llosa, a senior fellow at the Independent Institute, is the author of Liberty for Latin America: How to Undo Five Hundred Years of Oppression (Farrar, Straus and Giroux).

------------------------

The metamorphosis of Che Guevara into a capitalist brand is not new, but the brand has been enjoying a revival of late?-an especially remarkable revival, since it comes years after the political and ideological collapse of all that Guevara represented. This windfall is owed substantially to The Motorcycle Diaries, the film produced by Robert Redford and directed by Walter Salles. (It is one of three major motion pictures on Che either made or in the process of being made in the last two years; the other two have been directed by Josh Evans and Steven Soderbergh.) Beautifully shot against landscapes that have clearly eluded the eroding effects of polluting capitalism, the film shows the young man on a voyage of self-discovery as his budding social conscience encounters social and economic exploitation?-laying the ground for a New Wave re-invention of the man whom Sartre once called the most complete human being of our era.

But to be more precise, the current Che revival started in 1997, on the thirtieth anniversary of his death, when five biographies hit the bookstores, and his remains were discovered near an airstrip at Bolivia's Vallegrande airport, after a retired Bolivian general, in a spectacularly timed revelation, disclosed the exact location. The anniversary refocused attention on Freddy Alborta's famous photograph of Che's corpse laid out on a table, foreshortened and dead and romantic, looking like Christ in a Mantegna painting.

It is customary for followers of a cult not to know the real life story of their hero, the historical truth. (Many Rastafarians would renounce Haile Selassie if they had any notion of who he really was.) It is not surprising that Guevara's contemporary followers, his new postcommunist admirers, also delude themselves by clinging to a myth?-except the young Argentines who have come up with an expression that rhymes perfectly in Spanish: "Tengo una remera del Che y no sé por qué," or "I have a Che T-shirt and I don't know why."

Consider some of the people who have recently brandished or invoked Guevara's likeness as a beacon of justice and rebellion against the abuse of power. In Lebanon, demonstrators protesting against Syria at the grave of former prime minister Rafiq Hariri carried Che's image. Thierry Henry, a French soccer player who plays for Arsenal, in England, showed up at a major gala organized by FIFA, the world's soccer body, wearing a red and black Che Tfilm shirt. In a recent review in The New York Times of George A. Romero's Land of the Dead, Manohla Dargis noted that "the greatest shock here may be the transformation of a black zombie into a righteous revolutionary leader," and added,"I guess Che really does live, after all." The soccer hero Maradona showed off the emblematic Che tattoo on his right arm during a trip where he met Hugo Chávez in Venezuela. In Stavropol, in southern Russia, protesters denouncing cash payments of welfare concessions took to the central square with Che flags. In San Francisco, City Lights Books, the legendary home of beat literature, treats visitors to a section devoted to Latin America in which half the shelves are taken up by Che books. José Luis Montoya, a Mexican police officer who battles drug crime in Mexicali, wears a Che sweatband because it makes him feel stronger. At the Dheisheh refugee camp on the West Bank, Che posters adorn a wall that pays tribute to the Intifada. A Sunday magazine devoted to social life in Sydney,Australia, lists the three dream guests at a dinner party: Alvar Aalto, Richard Branson, and Che Guevara. Leung Kwokhung, the rebel elected to Hong Kong's Legislative Council, defies Beijing by wearing a Che T-shirt. In Brazil, Frei Betto, President Lula da Silva's adviser in charge of the highprofile "Zero Hunger" program, says that "we should have paid less attention to Trotsky and much more to Che Guevara." And most famously, at this year's Academy Awards ceremony Carlos Santana and Antonio Banderas performed the theme song from The Motorcycle Diaries, and Santana showed up wearing a Che T-shirt and a crucifix. The manifestations of the new cult of Che are everywhere. Once again the myth is firing up people whose causes for the most part represent the exact opposite of what Guevara was.

No man is without some redeeming qualities. In the case of Che Guevara, those qualities may help us to measure the gulf that separates reality from myth. His honesty (well, partial honesty) meant that he left written testimony of his cruelties, including the really ugly, though not the ugliest, stuff. His courage?-what Castro described as "his way, in every difficult and dangerous moment, of doing the most difficult and dangerous thing"?- meant that he did not live to take full responsibility for Cuba's hell. Myth can tell you as much about an era as truth. And so it is that thanks to Che's own testimonials to his thoughts and his deeds, and thanks also to his premature departure, we may know exactly how deluded so many of our contemporaries are about so much.

Guevara might have been enamored of his own death, but he was much more enamored of other people's deaths. In April 1967, speaking from experience, he summed up his homicidal idea of justice in his "Message to the Tricontinental": "hatred as an element of struggle; unbending hatred for the enemy, which pushes a human being beyond his natural limitations, making him into an effective, violent, selective, and cold-blooded killing machine." His earlier writings are also peppered with this rhetorical and ideological violence. Although his former girlfriend Chichina Ferreyra doubts that the original version of the diaries of his motorcycle trip contains the observation that "I feel my nostrils dilate savoring the acrid smell of gunpowder and blood of the enemy," Guevara did share with Granado at that very young age this exclamation: "Revolution without firing a shot? You're crazy." At other times the young bohemian seemed unable to distinguish between the levity of death as a spectacle and the tragedy of a revolution's victims. In a letter to his mother in 1954, written in Guatemala, where he witnessed the overthrow of the revolutionary government of Jacobo Arbenz, he wrote: "It was all a lot of fun, what with the bombs, speeches, and other distractions to break the monotony I was living in."

Guevara's disposition when he traveled with Castro from Mexico to Cuba aboard the Granma is captured in a phrase in a letter to his wife that he penned on January 28, 1957, not long after disembarking, which was published in her book Ernesto: A Memoir of Che Guevara in Sierra Maestra: "Here in the Cuban jungle, alive and bloodthirsty."This mentality had been reinforced by his conviction that Arbenz had lost power because he had failed to execute his potential enemies. An earlier letter to his former girlfriend Tita Infante had observed that "if there had been some executions, the government would have maintained the capacity to return the blows." It is hardly a surprise that during the armed struggle against Batista, and then after the triumphant entry into Havana, Guevara murdered or oversaw the executions in summary trials of scores of people?- proven enemies, suspected enemies, and those who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

In January 1957, as his diary from the Sierra Maestra indicates, Guevara shot Eutimio Guerra because he suspected him of passing on information: "I ended the problem with a .32 caliber pistol, in the right side of his brain. . . . His belongings were now mine." Later he shot Aristidio, a peasant who expressed the desire to leave whenever the rebels moved on. While he wondered whether this particular victim "was really guilty enough to deserve death," he had no qualms about ordering the death of Echevarría, a brother of one of his comrades, because of unspecified crimes:"He had to pay the price." At other times he would simulate executions without carrying them out, as a method of psychological torture.

Luis Guardia and Pedro Corzo, two researchers in Florida who are working on a documentary about Guevara, have obtained the testimony of Jaime Costa Vázquez, a former commander in the revolutionary army known as "El Catalán," who maintains that many of the executions attributed to Ramiro Valdés, a future interior minister of Cuba, were Guevara's direct responsibility, because Valdés was under his orders in the mountains." If in doubt, kill him" were Che's instructions. On the eve of victory, according to Costa, Che ordered the execution of a couple dozen people in Santa Clara, in central Cuba, where his column had gone as part of a final assault on the island. Some of them were shot in a hotel, as Marcelo Fernándes-Zayas, another former revolutionary who later became a journalist, has written?-adding that among those executed, known as casquitos, were peasants who had joined the army simply to escape unemployment.

But the "cold-blooded killing machine" did not show the full extent of his rigor until, immediately after the collapse of the Batista regime, Castro put him in charge of La Cabaña prison. (Castro had a clinically good eye for picking the right person to guard the revolution against infection.) San Carlos de La Cabaña was a stone fortress used to defend Havana against English pirates in the eighteenth century; later it became a military barracks. In a manner chillingly reminiscent of Lavrenti Beria, Guevara presided during the first half of 1959 over one of the darkest periods of the revolution. José Vilasuso, a lawyer and a professor at Universidad Interamericana de Bayamón in Puerto Rico, who belonged to the body in charge of the summary judicial process at La Cabaña, told me recently that

    Che was in charge of the Comisión Depuradora.The process followed the law of the Sierra: there was a military court and Che's guidelines to us were that we should act with conviction, meaning that they were all murderers and the revolutionary way to proceed was to be implacable. My direct superior was Miguel Duque Estrada. My duty was to legalize the files before they were sent on to the Ministry. Executions took place from Monday to Friday, in the middle of the night, just after the sentence was given and automatically confirmed by the appellate body. On the most gruesome night I remember, seven men were executed.
Javier Arzuaga, the Basque chaplain who gave comfort to those sentenced to die and personally witnessed dozens of executions, spoke to me recently from his home in Puerto Rico.A former Catholic priest, now seventy-five, who describes himself as "closer to Leonardo Boff and Liberation Theology than to the former Cardinal Ratzinger," he recalls that

    there were about eight hundred prisoners in a space fit for no more than three hundred: former Batista military and police personnel, some journalists, a few businessmen and merchants.The revolutionary tribunal was made of militiamen. Che Guevara presided over the appellate court. He never overturned a sentence. I would visit those on death row at the [i]galera de la muerte[/i]. A rumor went around that I hypnotized prisoners because many remained calm, so Che ordered that I be present at the executions. After I left in May, they executed many more, but I personally witnessed fifty-five executions. There was an American, Herman Marks, apparently a former convict. We called him "the butcher" because he enjoyed giving the order to shoot. I pleaded many times with Che on behalf of prisoners. I remember especially the case of Ariel Lima, a young boy. Che did not budge. Nor did Fidel, whom I visited. I became so traumatized that at the end of May 1959 I was ordered to leave the parish of Casa Blanca, where La Cabaña was located and where I had held Mass for three years. I went to Mexico for treatment.The day I left, Che told me we had both tried to bring one another to each other's side and had failed. His last words were:"When we take our masks off, we will be enemies."
How many people were killed at La Cabaña? Pedro Corzo offers a figure of some two hundred, similar to that given by Armando Lago, a retired economics professor who has compiled a list of 179 names as part of an eight-year study on executions in Cuba. Vilasuso told me that four hundred people were executed between January and the end of June in 1959 (at which point Che ceased to be in charge of La Cabaña). Secret cables sent by the American Embassy in Havana to the State Department in Washington spoke of "over 500." According to Jorge Castañeda, one of Guevara's biographers, a Basque Catholic sympathetic to the revolution, the late Father Iñaki de Aspiazú, spoke of seven hundred victims. Félix Rodríguez, a CIA agent who was part of the team in charge of the hunt for Guevara in Bolivia, told me that he confronted Che after his capture about "the two thousand or so" executions for which he was responsible during his lifetime. "He said they were all CIA agents and did not address the figure," Rodríguez recalls. The higher figures may include executions that took place in the months after Che ceased to be in charge of the prison.

Which brings us back to Carlos Santana and his chic Che gear. In an open letter published in El Nuevo Herald on March 31 of this year, the great jazz musician Paquito D'Rivera castigated Santana for his costume at the Oscars, and added: "One of those Cubans [at La Cabaña] was my cousin Bebo, who was imprisoned there precisely for being a Christian. He recounts to me with infinite bitterness how he could hear from his cell in the early hours of dawn the executions, without trial or process of law, of the many who died shouting, ?'Long live Christ the King!' "

Che's lust for power had other ways of expressing itself besides murder. The contradiction between his passion for travel?-a protest of sorts against the of the nation-state?-and his impulse to become himself an enslaving state over others is poignant. In writing about Pedro Valdivia, the conquistador of Chile, Guevara reflected: "He belonged to that special class of men the species produces every so often, in whom a craving for limitless power is so extreme that any suffering to achieve it seems natural."He might have been describing himself. At every stage of his adult life, his megalomania manifested itself in the predatory urge to take over other people's lives and property, and to abolish their free will.

In 1958, after taking the city of Sancti Spiritus, Guevara unsuccessfully tried to impose a kind of sharia, regulating relations between men and women, the use of alcohol, and informal gambling?-a puritanism that did not exactly characterize his own way of life. He also ordered his men to rob banks, a decision that he justified in a letter to Enrique Oltuski, a subordinate, in November of that year: "The struggling masses agree to robbing banks because none of them has a penny in them."This idea of revolution as a license to re-allocate property as he saw fit led the Marxist Puritan to take over the mansion of an emigrant after the triumph of the revolution.

The urge to dispossess others of their property and to claim ownership of others' territory was central to Guevara's politics of raw power. In his memoirs, the Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser records that Guevara asked him how many people had left his country because of land reform. When Nasser replied that no one had left, Che countered in anger that the way to measure the depth of change is by the number of people "who feel there is no place for them in the new society."This predatory instinct reached a pinnacle in 1965, when he started talking, God-like, about the "New Man" that he and his revolution would create.

Che's obsession with collectivist control led him to collaborate on the formation of the security apparatus that was set up to subjugate six and a half million Cubans. In early 1959, a series of secret meetings took place in Tarará, near Havana, at the mansion to which Che temporarily withdrew to recover from an illness. That is where the top leaders, including Castro, designed the Cuban police state. Ramiro Valdés, Che's subordinate during the guerrilla war, was put in charge of G-2, a body modeled on the Cheka. Angel Ciutah, a veteran of the Spanish Civil War sent by the Soviets who had been very close to Ramón Mercader, Trotsky's assassin, and later befriended Che, played a key role in organizing the system, together with Luis Alberto Lavandeira, who had served the boss at La Cabaña. Guevara himself took charge of G-6, the body tasked with the ideological indoctrination of the armed forces. The U.S.-backed Bay of Pigs invasion in April 1961 became the perfect occasion to consolidate the new police state, with the rounding up of tens of thousands of Cubans and a new series of executions. As Guevara himself told the Soviet ambassador Sergei Kudriavtsev, counterrevolutionaries were never "to raise their head again."

Counterrevolutionary" is the term that was applied to anyone who departed from dogma. It was the communist synonym for "heretic." Concentration camps were one form in which dogmatic power was employed to suppress dissent. History attributes to the Spanish general Valeriano Weyler, the captain-general of Cuba at the end of the nineteenth century, the first use of the word "concentration" to describe the policy of surrounding masses of potential opponents?-in his case, supporters of the Cuban independence movement?- with barbed wire and fences. How fitting that Cuba's revolutionaries more than half a century later were to take up this indigenous tradition. In the beginning, the revolution mobilized volunteers to build schools and to work in ports, plantations, and factories?-all exquisite photo-ops for Che the stevedore, Che the cane-cutter, Che the clothmaker. It was not long before volunteer work became a little less voluntary: the first forced labor camp, Guanahacabibes, was set up in western Cuba at the end of 1960.This is how Che explained the function performed by this method of confinement: "[We] only send to Guanahacabibes those doubtful cases where we are not sure people should go to jail . . . people who have committed crimes against revolutionary morals, to a lesser or greater degree. . . . It is hard labor, not brute labor, rather the working conditions there are hard."

This camp was the precursor to the eventual systematic confinement, starting in 1965 in the province of Camagüey, of dissidents, homosexuals,AIDS victims, Catholics, Jehovah's Witnesses, Afro- Cuban priests, and other such scum, under the banner of Unidades Militares de Ayuda a la Producción, or Military Units to Help Production. Herded into buses and trucks, the "unfit" would be transported at gunpoint into concentration camps organized on the Guanahacabibes mold. Some would never return; others would be raped, beaten, or mutilated; and most would be traumatized for life, as Néstor Almendros's wrenching documentary Improper Conduct showed the world a couple of decades ago.

So TIME magazine may have been less than accurate in August 1960 when it described the revolution's division of labor with a cover story featuring Che Guevara as the "brain" and Fidel Castro as the "heart" and Raúl Castro as the "fist." But the perception reflected Guevara's crucial role in turning Cuba into a bastion of totalitarianism. Che was a somewhat unlikely candidate for ideological purity, given his bohemian spirit, but during the years of training in Mexico and in the ensuing period of armed struggle in Cuba he emerged as the communist ideologue infatuated with the Soviet Union, much to the discomfort of Castro and others who were essentially opportunists using whatever means were necessary to gain power. When the would-be revolutionaries were arrested in Mexico in 1956, Guevara was the only one who admitted that he was a communist and was studying Russian. (He spoke openly about his relationship with Nikolai Leonov from the Soviet Embassy.) During the armed struggle in Cuba, he forged a strong alliance with the Popular Socialist Party (the island's Communist Party) and with Carlos Rafael Rodríguez, a key player in the conversion of Castro's regime to communism.

This fanatical disposition made Che into a linchpin of the "Sovietization" of the revolution that had repeatedly boasted about its independent character. Very soon after the barbudos came to power, Guevara took part in negotiations with Anastas Mikoyan, the Soviet deputy prime minister, who visited Cuba. He was entrusted with the mission of furthering Soviet-Cuban negotiations during a visit to Moscow in late 1960. (It was part of a long trip in which Kim Il Sung's North Korea was the country that impressed him "the most.") Guevara's second trip to Russia, in August 1962, was even more significant, because it sealed the deal to turn Cuba into a Soviet nuclear beachhead. He met Khrushchev in Yalta to finalize details on an operation that had already begun and involved the introduction of forty-two Soviet missiles, half of which were armed with nuclear warheads, as well as launchers and some forty-two thousand soldiers. After pressing his Soviet allies on the danger that the United States might find out what was happening, Guevara obtained assurances that the Soviet navy would intervene?-in other words, that Moscow was ready to go to war.

According to Philippe Gavi's biography of Guevara, the revolutionary had bragged that "this country is willing to risk everything in an atomic war of unimaginable destructiveness to defend a principle." Just after the Cuban missile crisis ended?-with Khrushchev reneging on the promise made in Yalta and negotiating a deal with the United States behind Castro's back that included the removal of American missiles from Turkey?- Guevara told a British communist daily: "If the rockets had remained, we would have used them all and directed them against the very heart of the United States, including New York, in our defense against aggression."And a couple of years later, at the United Nations, he was true to form: "As Marxists we have maintained that peaceful coexistence among nations does not include coexistence between exploiters and the exploited."

Guevara distanced himself from the Soviet Union in the last years of his life. He did so for the wrong reasons, blaming Moscow for being too soft ideologically and diplomatically, for making too many concessions?-unlike Maoist China, which he came to see as a haven of orthodoxy. In October 1964, a memo written by Oleg Daroussenkov, a Soviet official close to him, quotes Guevara as saying: "We asked the Czechoslovaks for arms; they turned us down.Then we asked the Chinese; they said yes in a few days, and did not even charge us, stating that one does not sell arms to a friend." In fact, Guevara resented the fact that Moscow was asking other members of the communist bloc, including Cuba, for something in return for its colossal aid and political support. His final attack on Moscow came in Algiers, in February 1965, at an international conference, where he accused the Soviets of adopting the "law of value," that is, capitalism. His break with the Soviets, in sum, was not a cry for independence. It was an Enver Hoxha-like howl for the total subordination of reality to blind ideological orthodoxy.

The great revolutionary had a chance to put into practice his economic vision?-his idea of social justice?-as head of the National Bank of Cuba and of the Department of Industry of the National Institute of Agrarian Reform at the end of 1959, and, starting in early 1961, as minister of industry.The period in which Guevara was in charge of most of the Cuban economy saw the near-collapse of sugar production, the failure of industrialization, and the introduction of rationing?-all this in what had been one of Latin America's four most economically successful countries since before the Batista dictatorship.

His stint as head of the National Bank, during which he printed bills signed "Che," has been summarized by his deputy, Ernesto Betancourt: "[He] was ignorant of the most elementary economic principles." Guevara's powers of perception regarding the world economy were famously expressed in 1961, at a hemispheric conference in Uruguay, where he predicted a 10 percent rate of growth for Cuba "without the slightest fear," and, by 1980, a per capita income greater than that of "the U.S. today." In fact, by 1997, the thirtieth anniversary of his death, Cubans were dieting on a ration of five pounds of rice and one pound of beans per month; four ounces of meat twice a year; four ounces of soybean paste per week; and four eggs per month.

Land reform took land away from the rich, but gave it to the bureaucrats, not to the peasants. (The decree was written in Che's house.) In the name of diversification, the cultivated area was reduced and manpower distracted toward other activities. The result was that between 1961 and 1963, the harvest was down by half, to a mere 3.8 million metric tons. Was this sacrifice justified by progress in Cuban industrialization? Unfortunately, Cuba had no raw materials for heavy industry, and, as a consequence of the revolutionary redistribution, it had no hard currency with which to buy them?-or even basic goods. By 1961, Guevara was having to give embarrassing explanations to the workers at the office: "Our technical comrades at the companies have made a toothpaste . . . which is as good as the previous one; it cleans just the same, though after a while it turns to stone." By 1963, all hopes of industrializing Cuba were abandoned, and the revolution accepted its role as a colonial provider of sugar to the Soviet bloc in exchange for oil to cover its needs and to re-sell to other countries. For the next three decades, Cuba would survive on a Soviet subsidy of somewhere between $65 billion and $100 billion.

Having failed as a hero of social justice, does Guevara deserve a place in the history books as a genius of guerrilla warfare? His greatest military achievement in the fight against Batista?-taking the city of Santa Clara after ambushing a train with heavy reinforcements?- is seriously disputed. Numerous testimonies indicate that the commander of the train surrendered in advance, perhaps after taking bribes. (Gutiérrez Menoyo, who led a different guerrilla group in that area, is among those who have decried Cuba's official account of Guevara's victory.) Immediately after the triumph of the revolution, Guevara organized guerrilla armies in Nicaragua, the Dominican Republic, Panama, and Haiti?-all of which were crushed. In 1964, he sent the Argentine revolutionary Jorge Ricardo Masetti to his death by persuading him to mount an attack on his native country from Bolivia, just after representative democracy had been restored to Argentina.

Particularly disastrous was the Congo expedition in 1965. Guevara sided with two rebels?-Pierre Mulele in the west and Laurent Kabila in the east?-against the ugly Congolese government, which was sustained by the United States as well as by South African and exiled Cuban mercenaries. Mulele had taken over Stanleyville earlier before being driven back. During his reign of terror, as V. S. Naipaul has written, he murdered all the people who could read and all those who wore a tie. As for Guevara's other ally, Laurent Kabila, he was merely lazy and corrupt at the time; but the world would find out in the 1990s that he, too, was a killing machine. In any event, Guevara spent most of 1965 helping the rebels in the east before fleeing the country ignominiously. Soon afterward, Mobutu came to power and installed a decades-long tyranny. (In Latin American countries too, from Argentina to Peru, Che-inspired revolutions had the practical result of reinforcing brutal militarism for many years.)

In Bolivia, Che was defeated again, and for the last time. He misread the local situation.There had been an agrarian reform years before; the government had respected many of the peasant communities' institutions; and the army was close to the United States despite its nationalism. "The peasant masses don't help us at all" was Guevara's melancholy conclusion in his Bolivian diary. Even worse, Mario Monje, the local communist leader, who had no stomach for guerrilla warfare after having been humiliated at the elections, led Guevara to a vulnerable location in the southeast of the country. The circumstances of Che's capture at Yuro ravine, soon after meeting the French intellectual Régis Debray and the Argentine painter Ciro Bustos, both of whom were arrested as they left the camp, was, like most of the Bolivian expedition, an amateur's affair.

Guevara was certainly bold and courageous, and quick at organizing life on a military basis in the territories under his control, but he was no General Giap. His book Guerrilla Warfare teaches that popular forces can beat an army, that it is not necessary to wait for the right conditions because an insurrectional foco (or small group of revolutionaries) can bring them about, and that the fight must primarily take place in the countryside. (In his prescription for guerrilla warfare, he also reserves for women the roles of cooks and nurses.) However, Batista's army was not an army, but a corrupt bunch of thugs with no motivation and not much organization; and guerrilla focos, with the exception of Nicaragua, all ended up in ashes for the foquistas; and Latin America has turned 70 percent urban in these last four decades. In this regard, too, Che Guevara was a callous fool.

In the last few decades of the nineteenth century, Argentina had the second-highest growth rate in the world. By the 1890s, the real income of Argentine workers was greater than that of Swiss, German, and French workers. By 1928, that country had the twelfth-highest per capita GDP in the world. That achievement, which later generations would ruin, was in large measure due to Juan Bautista Alberdi. Like Guevara, Alberdi liked to travel: he walked through the pampas and deserts from north to south at the age of fourteen, all the way to Buenos Aires.

Like Guevara, Alberdi opposed a tyrant, Juan Manuel Rosas. Like Guevara, Alberdi got a chance to influence a revolutionary leader in power?-Justo José de Urquiza, who toppled Rosas in 1852. And like Guevara, Alberdi represented the new government on world tours, and died abroad. But unlike the old and new darling of the left, Alberdi never killed a fly. His book, Bases y puntos de partida para la organización de la República Argentina, was the foundation of the Constitution of 1853 that limited government, opened trade, encouraged immigration, and secured property rights, thereby inaugurating a seventy-year period of astonishing prosperity. He did not meddle in the affairs of other nations, opposing his country's war against Paraguay. His likeness does not adorn Mike Tyson's abdomen.

0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  0  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 01:46 pm
"Where a government has come into power through some form of popular vote, fraudulent or not, and maintains at least an appearance of constitutional legality, the guerrilla outbreak cannot be promoted, since the possibilities of peaceful struggle have not yet been exhausted."

-Ernesto "Che" Guevara



"The amount of poverty and suffering required for the emergence of a Rockefeller, and the amount of depravity that the accumulation of a fortune of such magnitude entails, are left out of the picture, and it is not always possible to make the people in general see this."

-Ernesto "Che" Guevara

Whatever his merits and demerits I respect that guy for those words which I had quoted above.
He had prooved to the world that he is not a couch-potatoe or the easy-chair intellectual.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 03:34 pm
Thanks Nimh...I didn't realise there had been an earlier thread.


I'll read your stuff when I get home from work.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  3  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 03:36 pm
Well, Rama that's not a very good logic. I could surely find two or three statements by Hitler that are all peaceful and loving.... that will not, however, make me respect Hitler for them.

Not to say Ernesto Guevara was a Hitler.... just that you can pluck quotes to support pretty much anything you want to convey, it doesn't really say much about the man himself.

Nimh, that was a great read, thanks for posting that. I real ALL of it and sent it to my ex who has a Che t-shirt...we always had (lighthearted, yet) squabbles about it.
0 Replies
 
Robert Gentel
 
  3  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 03:55 pm
I see his legacy being almost exclusively based on that extremely well-done bit of graphic artistry and his execution.

He never actually did anything worthy of his iconic status and was little more than a wandering youth searching for a cause. But what he wanted to do resonates to this day in revolutionary leftist youth.

But that's par for the course. Many revolutionary icons did little other than die unjustly.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 04:07 pm
Robert Gentel wrote:
I see his legacy being almost exclusively based on that extremely well-done bit of graphic artistry and his execution.

He never actually did anything worthy of his iconic status and was little more than a wandering youth searching for a cause. But what he wanted to do resonates to this day in revolutionary leftist youth.

But that's par for the course. Many revolutionary icons did little other than die unjustly.


I thought he had some real success as a commander?

The article that pointed out the changes to the most iconic photo also pointed out the creation of a kind of revolutionary christ image...assisted by the also iconic death photo...I do find myself wondering if this apparent hunger for young and beautiful martyrs fills a basic human need, since it exists in mythology, religions, political ideology (which so resembles religion in many ways) and popular culture...
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 04:46 pm
The world Che grew up in was far different from the world we at our computers live in. For one, the United States government viewed the lands to the south as an exclusive preserve, where they could coerce and manipulate the people and their governments at will - by armed force and assassinations, if necessary. Only right wing toady dictatorship governments seemed to survive for long. The government that Che helped Castro supplant was at least as corrupt as is Castro's. But, the US govt. turned a blind eye, as it would have done Castro, had he not confiscated American business property and announced himself as a Communist. Guevera thought Bolivia was ripe to become another Cuba type of land, and he sought to make it so. He saw the yoke of America as an evil to be defeated all over latin America. I read a book or two by him, in those days, and I still think of him as no worse than his enemies.
Robert Gentel
 
  2  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 04:50 pm
dlowan wrote:

I thought he had some real success as a commander?


Perhaps, but nothing that merits him being known by anyone other than his peers. It's not like every half-wit who enjoys some king of military success is a household name.

Ultimately he's known for what he's supposed to represent, not for anything he actually did.

I have yet to meet a single Che fan who can tell me anything that he did. They'll wear his likeness and espouse "his" politics but still can't tell me what he accomplished.

Most can't even tell me where he is from and where he went. All they know is the symbol and what the Che brand is supposed to represent.

Quote:
I do find myself wondering if this apparent hunger for young and beautiful martyrs fills a basic human need, since it exists in mythology, religions, political ideology (which so resembles religion in many ways) and popular culture...


Humans are obsessed with death and beauty separately, but I think there's an extra connection to death and beauty toghether that has additional emotional appeal due to the perceived additional injustice of dying young.

As the late rapper Edgar Allan Poe said in one of his hit singles (Lenore):

"A dirge for her the doubly dead in that she died so young."

I think the unrealized potential is a big part of it. Che may have eventually changed his corner of the world but his chance was cut off short. Part of his legacy may have to do with what people dreamed he would have done more than what he actually did.

But I personally think very lowly of him. I think he was little more than a thug who happened to rationalize his own hyper-aggression through politics.

Some people need a dragon. He certainly seemed to, and in a perfect world I bet he would still be advocating violence.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 04:56 pm
I thought it was the beret, and I'm only fractionally kidding. (I still like berets, even after Monica.)

I need to check Paul Berman, not sure if I'm remembering the same guy.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 05:01 pm
"Some people need a dragon. He certainly seemed to, and in a perfect world I bet he would still be advocating violence."


I am a self confessed Che ignoramus...having been too irritated by the ignorant t shirt etc nonsense to really look at him...I do have friends who have some reverence for him, and have, I know, really studied him....I have generally avoided arguments with them because they know more than I do, and some fights aren't wrth having...but I will make a point of asking them what they see as his achievements.


I do think from the little I know that your comment above is rather harsh....I would have thought there were dragons enough in his world to justify a commitment to doing something about them? I'd be interested in some further understanding of your reason for saying that.

If you have the inclination, I'd be interested in hearing what you would have thought to be reasonable actions in Che's circumstances.
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 05:08 pm
edgar said it - short and to the point :

Quote:
The world Che grew up in was far different from the world we at our computers live in. For one, the United States government viewed the lands to the south as an exclusive preserve, where they could coerce and manipulate the people and their governments at will - by armed force and assassinations, if necessary. Only right wing toady dictatorship governments seemed to survive for long. The government that Che helped Castro supplant was at least as corrupt as is Castro's. But, the US govt. turned a blind eye, as it would have done Castro, had he not confiscated American business property and announced himself as a Communist. Guevera thought Bolivia was ripe to become another Cuba type of land, and he sought to make it so. He saw the yoke of America as an evil to be defeated all over latin America. I read a book or two by him, in those days, and I still think of him as no worse than his enemies.


and in many (most ?) countries of central and south-america and the caribbean , what edgar wrote still applies today .
not much has improved for the poor .
hbg
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 05:10 pm
No worse than his enemies is right, perhaps. But 'just as bad' is perhaps also right.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 05:12 pm
dagmaraka wrote:
No worse than his enemies is right, perhaps. But 'just as bad' is perhaps also right.



Really? Can you expand on this? Do you mean ideologically? Bodycount?
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  0  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 05:12 pm
Well, Rama that's not a very good logic. I could surely find two or three statements by Hitler that are all peaceful and loving.... that will not, however, make me respect Hitler for them.

Not to say Ernesto Guevara was a Hitler.... just that you can pluck quotes to support pretty much anything you want to convey, it doesn't really say much about the man himself.



Yes
But I had commented about this person in my above response.
Moreover
Hitler is not the subject of this thread.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 05:17 pm
dlowan wrote:
dagmaraka wrote:
No worse than his enemies is right, perhaps. But 'just as bad' is perhaps also right.



Really? Can you expand on this? Do you mean ideologically? Bodycount?


Yes, ideologically. To achieve the Revolution by force, using and encouraging hate of the enemy. I was never fond of such approaches. Anything 'for the sake of masses' usually ends up hurting the masses. Plus, who really talks with the 'masses' about what they want.
I am not objective. I grew up under communism. I dislike what communism was when I was growing up and I dislike what Cuba is today.

Rama, I was just commenting on the logic of quoting selective statements. Either think about it, or just forget it. Up to you.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  3  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 05:20 pm
hamburger wrote:
edgar said it - short and to the point :

Quote:
The world Che grew up in was far different from the world we at our computers live in.


That hardly relativates the violence - dogmatic, ruthless and often futile violence - that he inflicted on scores of people, though. The world may have been a different place, but people then were no less hurt by torture and political terror than they are now. And they resented it no less either.

It may seem easy to moralise about human rights from behind our computers in our prosperous countries, yes. But it is no less easy to casually relativate the terror that came with revolutions there as, you know, par for course for those countries, in those times, from behind our computers in our prosperous countries. I doubt its victims were as lacsidaisical* about it.

That was the mistake made by a few too many contemporary fellow-travellers of the Russian and Chinese revolutions too. News of terror sown by insurgent revolutionaries, or of the violent state clampdowns once they were in power, was too often relativated in terms like, you cant make an omelette without breaking eggs, or: you have to see it in the context of that country, with its violent history. All very easily said for a Communist intellectual from his Berlin, London or New York study.


*(Someone tell me how to spell that..)
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 05:25 pm
nimh wrote:
hamburger wrote:
edgar said it - short and to the point :

Quote:
The world Che grew up in was far different from the world we at our computers live in.


That hardly relativates the violence - dogmatic, ruthless and often futile violence - that he inflicted on scores of people, though. The world may have been a different place, but people then were no less hurt by torture and political terror than they are now. And they resented it no less either.

It may seem easy to moralise about human rights from behind our computers in our prosperous countries, yes. But it is no less easy to casually relativate the terror that came with revolutions there as, you know, par for course for those countries, in those times, from behind our computers in our prosperous countries. I doubt its victims were as lacsidaisical* about it.

That was the mistake made by a few too many contemporary fellow-travellers of the Russian and Chinese revolutions too. News of terror sown by insurgent revolutionaries, or of the violent state clampdowns once they were in power, was too often relativated in terms like, you cant make an omelette without breaking eggs, or: you have to see it in the context of that country, with its violent history. All very easily said for a Communist intellectual from his Berlin, London or New York study.


*(Someone tell me how to spell that..)




lackadaisical

:wink:




Thanks Dag and Nimh. Interesting. I absolutely agree re the study...for both left and right. It's easy to dismiss death and suffering when it isn't yours.


Interestingly, I was reading that Che was disturbed by Cuba's closeness to the USSR...but I also hear him denounced as Stalinist....?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 05:29 pm
dlowan wrote:
dagmaraka wrote:
No worse than his enemies is right, perhaps. But 'just as bad' is perhaps also right.

Really? Can you expand on this? Do you mean ideologically? Bodycount?

Re bodycount -- I am not anywhere as informed about Cuba as Vargas Losa or Berman, so dont ask me about numbers.. But just want to make one observation. Look at other Communist countries that emerged after a revolution. How many people died at their hands? And how many died at the hands of the reactionary regimes they replaced?

Soviet Russia certainly was far more murderous than Tsarist Russia was. Maoist China was far more murderous than the ancien regimes there had been. Sandinista Nicaragua was less violent than Somoza's preceding dictatorship had been; but the same can not be said of communist Vietnam, if you compare it with the reactionary Vietnam from before the war - or of Cambodia of course. Ethiopia's Haile Selassie was a murderous dictator, but the communist Mengistu Haile Mariam who succeeded him was no better..

Again, I dont know - but I'd not be surprised if the body count per year of Castro's regime actually was worse than that of Batista's. Would like to see the numbers for that.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Oct, 2007 05:31 pm
Violence was being used, by superior forces, before and after Che made his try. Anybody who thinks the US forces were going to dialog for a better world does not know the situation, as it existed on the ground, then. Torture and killing by dictators was allowed by the Americans. They had CIA active in all trouble spots.

When Cuba's Bautista had the protesting nuns murdered in the streets, I don't believe anybody batted an eye, except the revolutionaries.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Paraguay's turn to turn left - Discussion by nimh
Unpopular Presidencies - Discussion by fbaezer
Mexican Elections 2024 - Discussion by fbaezer
Mexican elections 2018 - Discussion by fbaezer
Mexico City - Question by fbaezer
Hi-how many Hispanic members are here? - Question by JGoldman10
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Che Guavara...forty years on.
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/09/2026 at 06:12:36