@Thomas,
Thomas wrote:The authors of the Wikipedia article makes no effort to research the claims of either side by themselves.
Well, they can't, it would be against the rules.
("No original research" and all that. Only way they could do something is if there'd be a published paper or article out there that did this analysis itself, and then they could quote or reference it.
Agreed that it's a problem that journalists, the American ones seemingly more so than the European ones, somehow have taken on the same methodology though.
Quote:So even if we assume a very generous margin of error for Rummel, it doesn't change the conclusion: If you would reject a Batista T-shirt because Batista was a butcher, you have no reason to wear a Che Guevara T-shirt either.
For sure, for sure. Like I said, I don't doubt his main finding, that the Castro regime was more bloody still than the Batista dictatorship it replaced, probably by a magnitude of well, uh, many. I just won't feel as comfortable quoting his exact numbers. But yeah, substantively it doesn't make all that much difference whether the Cuban communist regime has turned out to kill at four, eight or sixteen the proportional rate. Well, some, but not a lot.