331
   

What BOOK are you reading right now?

 
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jul, 2010 03:35 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

I can't stand authors that insist on clubbing you to death with their "brilliant insight".


That was much of my problem with Night Train to Lisbon - "oh, no, not more damned insight", but then I'd read on, and be interested despite myself. This push/pull was an ongoing thing in my reading.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jul, 2010 03:38 pm
@ossobuco,
I suppose I should reiterate I'm not generally any kind of devils and angels (oh, gag, Dan Brown) fan, but I can take a little of it if the reality parts are interesting and the writing amuses me. Barcelona in the twenties does interest me.
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jul, 2010 03:42 pm
@ossobuco,
no worries, me neither. but if you like Master and Margarita, or even just Dostoievsky (sans the mysticism), you'll like this one.

there is a LOT of Barcelona in there, btw.
tsarstepan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jul, 2010 03:49 pm
@dagmaraka,
dagmaraka wrote:

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51f0uBzkJ5L._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg

Got this book for Christmas and started reading it recently. Loving it, absolutely. It's a bit Bulgakovian...has that dark late 19th century Russian novel feel, with mysticism, devil, yet a strong dose of reality at the same time and good attention to detail and description.
Like. A lot.

Ummm... what the heck is Bulgakovian?! http://i49.tinypic.com/10p0sjq.jpg
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jul, 2010 03:56 pm
@tsarstepan,
http://a4.vox.com/6a00b8ea074bfd1bc000d4143312cc3c7f-500pi

Bulgakov. The writer. Possibly the best book ever, for me.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jul, 2010 03:56 pm
@dagmaraka,
OK, both going on my wish list.
0 Replies
 
fbaezer
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jul, 2010 04:01 pm
The Master and Margarita is a lot of fun.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jul, 2010 04:16 pm
@fbaezer,
Hard to remember how long ago I read Dostoyevsky... I think I was seventeen..

dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jul, 2010 04:25 pm
@ossobuco,
best age to read russian romanticism pieces.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jul, 2010 05:31 pm
@dagmaraka,
That was the Brothers..
I read it at work, between patients (after school, weekends). I was ok, once I got past all the names. And probably finished reading it at home.
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Jul, 2010 02:17 am

"Driving Home" by Jonathan Raban.

It's good. In fact, I'm going to recommend the first essay to JTT.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Jul, 2010 03:13 pm
@McTag,
If you like travel/history Mac try Sterne's A Sentimental Journey.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Jul, 2010 03:15 pm
@ossobuco,
And pray oss0 what lessons did you learn from it? That would be really interesting.
0 Replies
 
Gargamel
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Jul, 2010 03:58 pm
@fbaezer,
fbaezer wrote:

The Master and Margarita is a lot of fun.


I third the motion.
Razzleg
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Jul, 2010 10:04 pm
@Gargamel,
Gargamel wrote:

fbaezer wrote:

The Master and Margarita is a lot of fun.


I third the motion.


I fourth it. Bulgakov is tied for first in my "favorite Russian authors" list (with Turgenev). I reread The Master and Margarita every 3 years or so.

I'm currently reading The Kid by Dan Savage for the first time. It's pretty good so far. Next in line: The Warriors: Reflections on Men in Battle by J. Glenn Gray.
0 Replies
 
Kara
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 04:15 pm
@ossobuco,
Osso, I'm running waaaay behind the thread...but tell me if you liked Lehane's "A Drink Before the War." I heard it mentioned the other day in another context.
tsarstepan
 
  2  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 05:36 pm
@Kara,
I finished reading/listening to the class nightmare of Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro. Most definitely not a work that falls under the genre of science fiction but it couldn't exist without the concept of clonings and organ donations. And no that isn't a spoiler as it's well known plot point that's pretty much openly discussed in the first several chapters of the book.

The book revolves around 3 lifelong childhood friends of the Hailsham Boarding School where an entire subclass of human clones go through schooling so they can inevitably donate their organs to whomever wealthy enough had commissioned the government to farm them in the first place.

And as it's put in the NY Times review:
Quote:
here is no way around revealing the premise of Kazuo Ishiguro's new novel. It is brutal, especially for a writer celebrated as a poet of the unspoken. But it takes a while for us to get a handle on it. Since it's the nature of Ishiguro narrators to postpone a full reckoning of their place in the world, all we know in the early going is that we don't quite know what's going on.

We have inklings. The novel's 31-year-old narrator, Kathy H., announces on the first page that she has worked for more than 11 years as a ''carer.'' The people she assists in her line of work are ''donors'' at a recovery center, in pain and doped up on drugs. Logic suggests that bodily organs are involved. But gently decent Kathy is our host on this journey, and instead of surveying her life in the present (that would be ''England, late 1990's,'' according to an introductory note) she likes to let her mind wander back to the years she spent with her two closest friends, Ruth and Tommy, at boarding school -a fabled, bucolic place in the countryside with the Dickens-parody name of Hailsham.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/17/books/review/17KERRL.html

I hope people don't dismiss this book as some kind of retro-horror novel because its the relationships of the 3 main characters that make up the novel.

This book is the most painful because the protagonists are too naive and too accepting to their destined fate. The book is about their coping and surviving and finding out what life is meant to be when one knows one's condemned fate at such a young age.

I can not recommend it highly enough.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 05:39 pm
@Kara,
Yes, I did, Kara. (Not that you would, but maybe.)
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 05:46 pm
@ossobuco,
I messed up on my post before last, as I forgot that not far down in my book pile was:
Stephen Carter's The Emperor of Ocean Park. I probably read a review or competing reviews years ago, but now I'm reading the book as a blank slate. Not that I don't have views, but my views can war. So far, so good.
0 Replies
 
tsarstepan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 08:21 pm
Started on the uberfamous The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo on audible.com's audiobook. So far so good.

Surprisingly a lot more political then I'd imagine it would be.

Plus I particularly like the narrator/reader in this audiobook.
http://www.audible.com/pd/ref=sr_1_1?asin=B002UZMWNG&qid=1280456328&sr=1-1

 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 12/28/2024 at 09:38:40