1
   

Gravity

 
 
Reply Wed 26 Sep, 2007 08:48 pm
If gravity's pull on an object in the General Relativity sense of the force is not based on weight but on the curvature of space time, wouldn't it require objects in a gravitational field to be undergoing some sort of movement for them to experience the effects?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 550 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Sep, 2007 09:05 pm
No.

Imagine a ball-bearing on a ramp. It may start out stationary, but it will still roll down the incline.
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Sep, 2007 12:48 am
Seems to me that everything is in motion relative to something. E.g. that ball bearing is moving due to spin of the earth etc. Wasn't a central issue for Einstein as opposed to Newton, that there is no "fixed" independent reference point ?
0 Replies
 
Vengoropatubus
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Sep, 2007 08:38 pm
@ drewdad: your model assumes that there's some universal force pulling "down." I'm no expert in the field though, so maybe I forgot where that was written into general relativity.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Evolution 101 - Discussion by gungasnake
Typing Equations on a PC - Discussion by Brandon9000
The Future of Artificial Intelligence - Discussion by Brandon9000
The well known Mind vs Brain. - Discussion by crayon851
Scientists Offer Proof of 'Dark Matter' - Discussion by oralloy
Blue Saturn - Discussion by oralloy
Bald Eagle-DDT Myth Still Flying High - Discussion by gungasnake
DDT: A Weapon of Mass Survival - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Gravity
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.38 seconds on 10/01/2024 at 07:39:51