1
   

Parallel Universes Exist

 
 
Quincy
 
Reply Tue 25 Sep, 2007 05:57 am
Quote:
Parallel universes exist - study

Sep 23 11:33 PM US/Eastern

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=paUniverse_sun14_parallel_universes&show_article=1&cat=0

Parallel universes really do exist, according to a mathematical discovery by Oxford scientists described by one expert as "one of the most important developments in the history of science".

The parallel universe theory, first proposed in 1950 by the US physicist Hugh Everett, helps explain mysteries of quantum mechanics that have baffled scientists for decades, it is claimed.

In Everett's "many worlds" universe, every time a new physical possibility is explored, the universe splits. Given a number of possible alternative outcomes, each one is played out - in its own universe.

A motorist who has a near miss, for instance, might feel relieved at his lucky escape. But in a parallel universe, another version of the same driver will have been killed. Yet another universe will see the motorist recover after treatment in hospital. The number of alternative scenarios is endless.

It is a bizarre idea which has been dismissed as fanciful by many experts. But the new research from Oxford shows that it offers a mathematical answer to quantum conundrums that cannot be dismissed lightly - and suggests that Dr Everett, who was a Phd student at Princeton University when he came up with the theory, was on the right track.

Commenting in New Scientist magazine, Dr Andy Albrecht, a physicist at the University of California at Davis, said: "This work will go down as one of the most important developments in the history of science."

According to quantum mechanics, nothing at the subatomic scale can really be said to exist until it is observed. Until then, particles occupy nebulous "superposition" states, in which they can have simultaneous "up" and "down" spins, or appear to be in different places at the same time.

Observation appears to "nail down" a particular state of reality, in the same way as a spinning coin can only be said to be in a "heads" or "tails" state once it is caught.

According to quantum mechanics, unobserved particles are described by "wave functions" representing a set of multiple "probable" states. When an observer makes a measurement, the particle then settles down into one of these multiple options.

The Oxford team, led by Dr David Deutsch, showed mathematically that the bush-like branching structure created by the universe splitting into parallel versions of itself can explain the probabilistic nature of quantum outcomes.
© Copyright Press Association Ltd 2007, All Rights Reserved.


Quote:
Parallel universes make quantum sense
21 September 2007
Zeeya Merali
Magazine issue 2622
http://space.newscientist.com/article/mg19526223.700-parallel-universes-make-quantum-sense.html

If you think of yourself as unique, think again. The days when physicists could ignore the concept of parallel universes may have come to an end. If that doesn't send a shudder down your spine, think of it this way: our world is just one of many. You are just one version of many.

David Deutsch at the University of Oxford and colleagues have shown that key equations of quantum mechanics arise from the mathematics of parallel universes. "This work will go down as one of the most important developments in the history of science," says Andy Albrecht, a physicist at the University of California at Davis. In one parallel universe, at least, it will - whether it does in our one remains to be seen.

The "many worlds" interpretation of quantum mechanics was proposed 50 years ago by Hugh Everett, a graduate student at Princeton University. Rather than ...


I am no physicist. But it seems to me it is still a hypothesis. Would any knowledgeab;e person like to discuss Razz
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 833 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
tinygiraffe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Sep, 2007 09:16 am
i stopped reading peer-reviewed journals in favor of blogs and usa today a long time ago, so the answer is pretty obvious to me.
0 Replies
 
g day
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Sep, 2007 07:04 pm
As un-testable theorems go this is a fine one, borrowed by many fiction writers.

Putting a scientific framework on an idea - like time travel or infinite universes or infinite complexity (scale invariance) - asks is there a theoretical framework that can make sense of a concept. To be useful it needs to be able to make verifable deductions that eliminate other possibilities.

So angels making planets fly round is fine, you can build a framework of how it might operate, but you can't test it and it doesn't add anything that a theory of relativistic gravity doesn't already predict and describe. Nothing that the laws of science predict stop angels being the fundamental force carriers - or simply their movements being what drives all of reality.

Equally but it could be invisible green mutant ninja turtles - trouble is any hidden variable theory is kind of hard to validate unless that there is a definitive elimination test.

Here is where string theory is so easy to criticise. Take a reality with four obvious dimensions. Add six more hidden and exotic dimensions and try and build a science that describes there interactions. Twenty years later after a lot of horsepower by many top minds have worked on this guess how close you are to having anything that can be validated or used in a predictive sense. Still a long way off and the universe of angels or mutant turtles or any of trillions of other possibilities can still be covered by the overly broad and over-aching framework that is string theory.

Where does theoretical science start and pseudo-science, science fiction and pop culture thinking end? Maybe it's when a framework can make a verifiable elimination test. How many decades is this hidden variable variant away from being verifiable?
0 Replies
 
Quincy
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Sep, 2007 11:51 am
So it's a lot of drivvel ?
0 Replies
 
anakpawis
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Oct, 2007 08:55 pm
Parallel Universe is a make believe fantasy.

watch this:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4773590301316220374
0 Replies
 
tinygiraffe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 13 Oct, 2007 08:05 am
parallel universes exist, but they only exist in other universes...

everyone knows, our own universe is perpendicular.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Oct, 2007 10:01 am
Re: Parallel Universes Exist
Quote:
According to quantum mechanics...

I don't trust mechanics.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Oct, 2007 10:10 am
I only trust popular mechanics.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Evolution 101 - Discussion by gungasnake
Typing Equations on a PC - Discussion by Brandon9000
The Future of Artificial Intelligence - Discussion by Brandon9000
The well known Mind vs Brain. - Discussion by crayon851
Scientists Offer Proof of 'Dark Matter' - Discussion by oralloy
Blue Saturn - Discussion by oralloy
Bald Eagle-DDT Myth Still Flying High - Discussion by gungasnake
DDT: A Weapon of Mass Survival - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Parallel Universes Exist
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/01/2024 at 04:41:19