Fri 18 Sep, 2015 08:39 pm - Antidisestablishmentarianistically speaking from a disestablishmentarianistic perspective, I believe that you are full of simplemindednesses. (view)
Fri 18 Sep, 2015 06:38 pm - This can be interpreted that Rudolfo was in the dugout, and then criticized two team members. This can also be interpreted that the two team members were in the dugout, and then they were... (view)
Fri 18 Sep, 2015 04:52 pm - "...the dugout for losing their bats..."
This can be interpreted that the dugout's purpose was to be a place for losing their bats, and that Rudolfo criticized them in the dugout.... (view)
Fri 18 Sep, 2015 04:33 pm - It is unclear whether Rudolfo was at the ballpark, and then criticized other members for losing their bats, or whether other members lost their bats at the ballpark, and they were criticized by... (view)
Fri 18 Sep, 2015 04:28 pm - Even though the sentence is separated by a semicolon, we do not the context, and therefore the term 'his' is unclear, it could be referring to another James. Therefore it can be viewed... (view)
Fri 18 Sep, 2015 04:25 pm - The same thing here, it can be interpreted that people lost their baseball equipment at the ballpark during games, and Rudolfo criticized them for that, or it can be interpreted that Rudolfo was at... (view)
Fri 18 Sep, 2015 04:15 pm - Actually there are ways to force a statement to be unsarcastic. In your sentence, it had the option to be interpreted as sarcastic, therefore even if it did complete the goal of designating... (view)