Wed 11 Jan, 2006 10:28 am - Nah blaze. I'm a lot further east, a little more to the south. I'm about three miles from Louisiana. Good luck at your tournaments though. (view)
Mon 9 Jan, 2006 12:25 pm - You from East Texas blaze? If not, do you think you could share?
I went to a meet on Saturday. It actually was more difficult to run the affirmative. There is a lot of evidence out there... (view)
Fri 6 Jan, 2006 02:02 pm - Yeah. Privacy's a joke. If you run it for the negative, you'll get slaughtered.
I did think of something for the neg though (FINALLY), and it sort of goes along with privacy. Schools... (view)
Tue 3 Jan, 2006 12:36 pm - I must ammend my statement. Drug testing does discourage EC participation.
My point was that schools are always going to be allowed to take away certain rights from the students, because they... (view)
Mon 2 Jan, 2006 07:02 pm - There is absolutely NOTHING going for the negative here. The problem with school officials saying, "Dude. I think that kid does drugs," then calling parents is that if they're wrong,... (view)
Mon 12 Dec, 2005 09:21 am - Aren't there times when police do random stops?
I can agree that it discourages students from joing up, but am still having a difficult time coming up with much for the negative. All the... (view)
Thu 8 Dec, 2005 07:47 pm - They called me in to test me right after lunch, and I'd just been to the restroom. They watch me guzzle nearly a gallon of water and then counted my test positive. I was ENRAGED.... (view)
Thu 8 Dec, 2005 07:26 pm - New LD topic for Spring of 2006.
RESOLVED: Drug testing of high school extracurricular activity participants is justified.
I can think of all the pros in the world for it, but I'm... (view)
Mon 10 Jan, 2005 09:15 pm - Thanks PDiddie!
rmrrose, you could use education. Then you are talking about the efficiency of education as the most important value in the topic, which works out great. You can talk about poor... (view)
