Mon 14 Apr, 2014 07:08 am - If you are referring to the Moon, it was in very low orbit. Your impact physics is flawed. If you are trying to disprove a Lunar impact to the Mediterranean using current understandings of... (view)
Sun 13 Apr, 2014 08:42 am - There is no point if you wish to remain in some delusionary world.
There is a point if you would like to come out of Plato's "Allegory of the Cave"! Are you recognizing the... (view)
Sat 12 Apr, 2014 11:49 pm - post #5,634,121 [bottom page #9]
Yes.
That was my answer. Yes, the heavier ball will travel faster. It is human response, when two objects of dissimilar weight are held, generally the lighter one... (view)
Sat 12 Apr, 2014 06:35 pm - "If we don't change direction soon, we'll end up where we are going.", "When your I.Q. rises to 28, sell!" - Irwin Corey
(view)
Sat 12 Apr, 2014 06:16 pm - Yes.
I understand your frustration, finding all this out after being taught so much b.s., but it really won't help to have the "kill the messenger" mentality. Please go discuss this... (view)
Sat 12 Apr, 2014 06:03 pm - and this matters why?
Name one person [other than me of course] who can come up with a scenario to explain every single detail in the geography that these impact hypotheses will describe, well?... (view)
Sat 12 Apr, 2014 11:11 am - No, you can not prove pseudoscience with more pseudoscience!
Firstly they are on the Moon, lot less gravity for an effect, so need even more height.
Second, if you pay close attention, the hammer... (view)
Sat 12 Apr, 2014 10:52 am - Then explain the 'mountains' of evidence!
Just explain one detail- maybe give me the mechanism that raised the Appalachian Mt. range, can you?
What force formed the Marianna trench?... (view)