Wed 9 Apr, 2003 11:00 am - Why are you refusing to engage here? What exactly is your issue with the way in which I debate? If you have a complaint, it is only proper to spell it out in full.
I repeatedly have asked you... (view)
Wed 9 Apr, 2003 10:38 am - Now you are being contradictory. Earlier, you said that you were content to debate the Judeo-Christian god, and now you are not so content, and have not given any reason for the inconsistency.... (view)
Wed 9 Apr, 2003 09:52 am - [quote="satt_focusable"]jamespetts..
I did not talk about defining deity, god forbid, but about endowing deity with properties devoid of inconsistency under the background of supposed... (view)
Wed 9 Apr, 2003 08:23 am - [quote="satt_focusable"]An interlude:
Suppose deity exists, first, then continue with giving "ingredients" as you like without inconsistency. You will find the deity is the... (view)
Wed 9 Apr, 2003 08:21 am - [quote="Frank Apisa"]
...what do you consider to be the essential ingredients of accepting something as a deity?
If I like what you propose, I may accept it.
If I don't, I can... (view)
Wed 9 Apr, 2003 08:14 am - [quote="Frank Apisa"]James
James, where have I ever said that Ultimate Questions is less worthy of debate than your contentions about the probability of a deity existing?
Tue 8 Apr, 2003 03:35 pm - [quote="Frank Apisa"]James
You have said that you have evidence that leads you to conclude that the probability of a deity existing is infinitesimally small. I am asking you to back... (view)
Tue 8 Apr, 2003 01:14 pm - [quote="Frank Apisa"]I have never taken that position -- not here in this thread or any other thread. I have explained to you that I have never taken that position - and I gave that... (view)