Sun 15 Jul, 2007 05:26 pm - [quote="Setanta"]His response about the Russian army in the Russo-Turkish War of 1853 bears that out.[/quote]
And you thinking I referenced in any way shape or form the... (view)
Sat 14 Jul, 2007 07:42 pm - [quote="joefromchicago"]On the other hand, I have no interest in participating in yet another thread that microscopically dissects the tortured language of the second amendment.[/quote]... (view)
Fri 13 Jul, 2007 07:08 pm - [quote="Setanta"]I have presented a case--that the first Congress wrote the initial clause of the second amendment in order to assure that the powers granted to Congress were not... (view)
Fri 13 Jul, 2007 06:54 pm - [quote="joefromchicago"]But if you and I are right, congress [i]doesn't[/i] have the power to preempt the states' ability to maintain a well-regulated militia. Thus, it follows... (view)
Thu 12 Jul, 2007 06:11 pm - [quote="Setanta"]You continue to fail completely to make your case.[/quote]
At least I present a case. Apparently your entire argument rests solely on not recognizing or accepting an... (view)
Thu 12 Jul, 2007 12:07 pm - [quote="Setanta"]The first clause of the IInd Amendment in speaking of a "well-regulated militia" obviously refers to the powers granted to Congress in Article I, Section... (view)
Thu 12 Jul, 2007 11:46 am - [quote="joefromchicago"]Are you suggesting that states are [i]obligated[/i] to maintain militias by the second amendment?[/quote]
No, what I mean is that I am disgusted that under your... (view)
Wed 11 Jul, 2007 06:23 pm - [quote="Setanta"]In fact, although i have not brought this up before, i consider that well-regulated has no military meaning at all, and that you are building castles in Spain when you... (view)
Mon 9 Jul, 2007 10:58 am - [quote="joefromchicago"]Let's just concentrate on this one issue -- you have a habit of drifting, and I want you to remain focused on this particular point, for it seems clear to me... (view)
