Sat 12 Jun, 2010 02:34 pm -
[quote="ughaibu"] [quote="Extrain"]I already gave you reasons.[/quote]Fair enough, and I already rejected your reasons.[/QUOTE]
Yeah? On what ground?... (view)
Sat 12 Jun, 2010 02:12 pm - [quote="ughaibu"]
[quote="Extrain"]Since when is the world "incapable" of being mathematically modeled?[/quote][quote="ughaibu"]The algorithmic... (view)
Sat 12 Jun, 2010 01:52 pm - [quote="ughaibu"]
[quote="Extrain"][quote="ughaibu"]The algorithmic intractability at the base level, mathematical randomness, etc.[/quote]Isn't this a reason... (view)
Sat 12 Jun, 2010 01:42 pm - [quote="ughaibu"]
[quote="Extrain"]. . . . . one reason to think the world is within the intellectual compass of human beings. What reason do you have to [i]doubt[/i]... (view)
Sat 12 Jun, 2010 01:32 pm - [quote="ughaibu"]
[quote="Extrain"]I see every reason to prefer classical first-order logic--the only means by which anyone can make sense of the world[/quote]Well, I'm... (view)
Sat 12 Jun, 2010 01:21 pm - [quote="ughaibu"]
[quote="Extrain"]what makes you think paraconsistent logic is sound formal system in direct challenge to classical First-Order Logic... (view)
Sat 12 Jun, 2010 12:54 pm - [quote="ughaibu"]
[quote="Extrain"][quote="ughaibu"]such numbers occur in paraconsistent set theory.[/QUOTE]If this is true, then show it.[/quote]I'm not your... (view)
Sat 12 Jun, 2010 12:13 pm - [quote="ughaibu"][quote="Extrain"] Numbers which are less than themselves are logically impossible objects.[/quote] Incorrect, such numbers occur in paraconsistent set... (view)
Sat 12 Jun, 2010 11:57 am - [quote="ughaibu"][quote="Owen phil"]
[quote="ughaibu"]
[quote="Owen phil"]That these un-named numbers are numbers, can be asserted, therefore they do... (view)
