Mon 25 Oct, 2010 01:07 pm - i've ignored them because they lacked conviction, at least post a weblink where i can see what you're talking about, or explain more thoroughly if possible. and you still haven't... (view)
Sat 23 Oct, 2010 09:34 am - okay, now you're just irrational. there is a margin for common sense, which is totally different for everybody, and ofcourse you would be an idiot if you took that person seriously.
you... (view)
Sat 23 Oct, 2010 06:34 am - it feels like talking to a wall here. anyway. you have probably concretized all those amazing theories of yours, of others in you head, so it's futile for me, or anyone to even explain their... (view)
Fri 22 Oct, 2010 01:14 pm - oh dear.
i merely expressed everything fundamentally, ie utilising the basics to help you grasp the theory. you should agree, because the way you intepreted your ideas has to have some sort of... (view)
Thu 21 Oct, 2010 01:24 pm - haha no, well maybe a bit. everyone's deluding themselves every now and then when they talk to themselves. i just see everything in black and white. no emotions involved. do you get what... (view)
Wed 20 Oct, 2010 03:10 pm - hmm... in the 2nd example you gave, the fault was that the science lacked discipline. ofcourse if science lacked discipline, everything would run amok. even in your steven hawkens example, if his... (view)
Thu 14 Oct, 2010 01:09 pm - sorry for the late reply... semester tests. it's mathematical science -> mathematical statistics -> statistics.
the definition of science, in particular, is: " Knowledge acquired... (view)
Thu 7 Oct, 2010 10:33 am - so you are saying that rolling a die that produces a number is not truly random because it only has the limited margin 1-6? that is not true. randomness, or stochastic data can happen anywhere.... (view)
Wed 6 Oct, 2010 01:40 pm - random numbers are important in statistics. anyway, the main point is that theoretical science requires a literal approach as oppose to applying the science in real life situations where it's... (view)
Tue 5 Oct, 2010 02:36 pm - [quote="HexHammer"]
Still I must disagree, if we could formulate things into symbols, forulae and numbers, computers wouldn't need humans but only needed a camera and arms, then... (view)
