0
   

Freed after 25 years behind bars, in 200th DNA exoneration

 
 
Reyn
 
Reply Mon 23 Apr, 2007 08:30 pm
Anyone else still for the death penalty?

Quote:
Man freed after 25 years behind bars, in 200th DNA exoneration

by Louise Daly
Mon Apr 23, 12:49 PM ET

A man who spent 25 years in jail for a rape he didnt commit had his conviction quashed on the basis of new DNA evidence Monday, bringing to 200 the number of cases overturned in similar fashion nationwide since the 1980s.

A judge vacated Jerry Millers conviction on all charges stemming from the 1981 rape of a Chicago businesswoman, after his lawyers and state prosecutors presented genetic evidence that ruled him out as the attacker.

Miller, 48, already is out of jail, having been paroled in March 2006 after serving more than half of his sentence.

Monday's finding means the conviction will be expunged from his record. He now will be removed from a list of convicted sex offenders, and no longer will be required to wear the electronic tag that was a condition of his parole.

Just as importantly, it paves the way for him to seek compensation from the state for his quarter century of incarceration.

Miller was 21 years old and fresh from a stint in the army when he was fingered as the assailant in a brazen attack on a 44-year-old woman in a downtown Chicago garage late one night in September, 1981.

The attacker surprised the woman as she was about to enter her car. He beat, robbed and raped her, and then forced her into the trunk of her car.

With the victim still in the trunk, the assailant tried to drive the vehicle out of the garage, but was forced to flee on foot when confronted by two parking attendants.

DNA testing was not available when Miller was convicted of the attack in the early 1980s and sentenced to 45 years in jail for rape, robbery, and aggravated kidnapping and aggravated battery.

His conviction turned largely on what proved to be flawed eyewitness testimony, which is at fault in many wrongful conviction cases according to the Innocence Project, a non-profit legal clinic that helped to clear his name.

During his two and a half decades behind bars, Miller says he wrote hundreds of letters to lawyers, journalists and others seeking help.

It was one such letter to the Innocence Project that led to a request for the DNA testing that ultimately exposed his case as a miscarriage of justice.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 536 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Apr, 2007 08:33 pm
Something like 80-90% of cases don't involve DNA. That means a wrongfully convicted person has only a slight chance of getting exhonerated.
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Apr, 2007 09:00 pm
Wow! It's that high, huh?

I'm keeping my nose clean.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2007 03:55 am
One type of case most likely to leave DNA evidence is rape, which amounted to 123 of the 200 exonerations. Rape is a crime that also reveals the most evidence of racial bias.

Only 12 percent of sexual assaults are between a victim of one race and an assailant of another, according to Justice Department statistics, yet 64 percent of the 200 exonerated convicts were black males convicted of raping white females.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-0704240608apr25,1,2812232.column?coll=chi-news-col
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2007 04:32 am
Im amazed that they kept the evidence that long.
Wasnt there any other forensic evidence?. When the assailant
put the woman in the trunk and then
tried to drive away, no fingerprints left?

I think that a one time payment of about, hmmm,
lemme see...

!^ Million Dollars.

His life has been affected , he couldnt train for a career anymore. He will always be doubted. Nope 16 million is about right.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2007 05:05 am
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 May, 2007 05:38 pm
farmerman wrote:
Nope 16 million is about right.


Most US states will either pay him nothing at all, or will pay him LESS than $100,000.

I am not sure which one is the case in the state he was wrongfully convicted in.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 May, 2007 09:37 am
oralloy wrote:
farmerman wrote:
Nope 16 million is about right.


Most US states will either pay him nothing at all, or will pay him LESS than $100,000.

I am not sure which one is the case in the state he was wrongfully convicted in.


And what's even worse is that these guys are required to pay income tax on these payments, which can eat a lot of the payment if it puts them in a high tax bracket.

I've started thinking that the best solution may be to simply require states to pay wrongfully convicted people salary and benefits, equal to whatever the governor gets, for the rest of their life. For federal convictions they can use congressmen as the benchmark for salary and benefits.
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Freed after 25 years behind bars, in 200th DNA exoneration
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/02/2024 at 10:31:36