0
   

Architecture as work of art - will train station get remodel

 
 
Reply Wed 29 Nov, 2006 05:28 pm
http://www.expatica.com/actual/article.asp?subchannel_id=52&story_id=34684

Interesting, I haven't seen this occur before (or, I don't think I have, at least on this scale):

Judges order Deutsche Bahn to remodel station
28 November 2006

Berlin (dpa) - A Berlin court ordered the German railway company Deutsche Bahn Tuesday to remodel its brand-new Berlin main station, one of the world's most expensive rail terminals, because the company did not follow the architect's design.

Meinhard von Gerkan, the German celebrity architect who has implemented more than a dozen prestige projects in China and Vietnam, sued the rail company. Arguing that the main station was a work of art, he complained that his creative rights had been infringed.

The five-level, steel-and-glass station marks the point where east-west trains cross a north-south tunnel through the heart of the German capital. Opened in May, the landmark cost as much as many airports: 700 million euros (915 million dollars).

Gerkan was upset that the tunnel level received a flat sheet- metal ceiling. He had planned a floodlit arching ceiling, resembling the curved glass roof over the station's elevated-track level.

Judges of the Berlin state court agreed, issuing an order that Deutsche Bahn remodel the deep level, a court spokeswoman said. At earlier hearings, Deutsche Bahn said it would appeal if it lost.

During construction, Bahn employed another architect to outfit the tunnel level with a lofty flat ceiling. Gerkan was outraged, saying the planned effect of the station as a whole had been spoiled.

"It's the world's biggest underground room," he told a Berlin newspaper in May. "It was an act of destruction."

The rail company says it will cost 40 million euros and take three years if it has to remodel the station, the most expensive in Germany and possibly the world since the great age of railway building. Gerkan's office says the cost will only be half as much.

The architect was also upset when Deutsche Bahn reduced the length of the glass roof over the station's elevated platforms, which have a panorama view of the Spree river and chancellor's office building.

The architect's firm, Gerkan, Marg and Partners, designed Lingang New City, a future development near Shanghai, and the National Conference Centre opened this year in the Vietnamese capital Hanoi.
DPA
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 736 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
Tico
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Nov, 2006 05:51 pm
Hmmmm, my creative rights are infringed constantly. :wink:

At first look, this may seem to be a case of artistic prima donna throwing a hissy fit.

In my much, much smaller world, I've always (maybe wrongly) had the philosophy that once a client has paid my fees in full, and providing that they do nothing to endanger the users health & safety, the design is owned by them. I have won contracts based on that clause in the contract, because clients who are paying the bill don't particularly want to be dictated by the designer. It is their project, after all. I've viewed as similar to someone commissioning a painting -- once its paid for, the owner can hide away, throw darts at it, or whatever.

But there is also an integrity issue, and it is my reputation that is on the line sometimes. I have had to ask one (former) client to remove my name, as the designer, from their restaurant website. They had made so many poorly considered compromises and changes to my original concept that I found the result to be embarrassing.

For an architect of renown, such as von Gerkan, a poorly executed design could have great monetary penalties to the future of his practice.
0 Replies
 
Roger Su
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Nov, 2006 09:51 am
Quote:
In my much, much smaller world, I've always (maybe wrongly) had the philosophy that once a client has paid my fees in full, and providing that they do nothing to endanger the users health & safety, the design is owned by them. I have won contracts based on that clause in the contract, because clients who are paying the bill don't particularly want to be dictated by the designer. It is their project, after all. I've viewed as similar to someone commissioning a painting -- once its paid for, the owner can hide away, throw darts at it, or whatever


But, at least, clients should inform the designer, and get his/her approval first. Then some revisement can be carryed on. If NOT, it is kind of a pirate. It is totally understandable that the architect is so wrathful.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Dec, 2006 03:15 pm
Another article on this -

http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1960135,00.html
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Dec, 2006 02:17 pm
I wonder why the Money Men thought they could get away with major alterations.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Dec, 2006 01:05 pm
Another article, with photos.
The bellyache of an architect


Get away with it, Noddy? There's precedent for an owner not to have to fulfill the plans, it being his or her or the city's property. And, of course, arguments in the other direction.

This article remarks on the precedent towards the architect in this situation.
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Dec, 2006 01:10 pm
Osso--

I'm collecting Social Security, but I keep finding out I've retained great chunks of innocence about the ways of the world.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Jan, 2007 06:09 pm
More trouble for the beleaguered (or seemingly beleaguered) new station - a two ton steel beam falls in the big storm of a couple of weeks ago -

http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1518,460928,00.html
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Architecture as work of art - will train station get remodel
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/04/2025 at 09:34:24