1
   

The Politically Incorrect Guide to English&American Lit

 
 
Miller
 
Reply Tue 14 Nov, 2006 09:30 am
The Politically Incorrect Guide to English and American Literature
Kantor, Elizabeth

The study of literature is essential to preserving Western culture and transmitting it to future generations. Yet today's English departments have come under the control of people who teach anything but the English and American literary classics. Even when the subject is Shakespeare or Faulkner, the professor's own politics -- Marxism, feminism, or some similar radical agenda -- will be the real content of the course. Meanwhile, today�s politically correct professors are busy replacing the "dead white males" of the traditional literary canon with the authors of 1980s bestsellers that hit all the politically correct themes.

The result? Most of us are missing out on the many things worth learning from great literature. The solution? This handy guide, which teaches you what every well-educated American should know about our literary heritage -- but through no fault of his own, probably doesn�t.

In The Politically Incorrect Guide to English and American Literature, Elizabeth Kantor, Ph.D.:

* introduces you to the great stories, the delightful plays, the powerful poems that constitute the traditional "canon" of English literary classics;

* gives you the tools (formerly taught in English departments, now neglected by PC professors) that you need to enjoy this literature more intensely -- and to learn from it in a way you can't learn from anything else;

* empowers you to see through every variety of politically correct "literary theory," such as "deconstruction";

* explains the real purpose of studying English and American literature;

* and demonstrates the necessity of literary study for the transmission of Western culture to the next generation.

Lists at the beginning of each chapter include the literature discussed as well as other works that together add up to a curriculum for a complete self-taught survey of English and American literature. Whether you�re currently in college, or just someone who wasn't really taught English literature and wishes he had been, the literary works, themes, and modes of analysis treated in this Guide will give you a solid start in discovering the infinite variety of wonderful literature written in our language -- and the life-changing lessons you can take from it.

What PC English professors don�t want you to learn from . . .

* Beowulf: Heroes deserve our respect and gratitude. If we don't admire them, there's something wrong with us

* Medieval English literature: The wisdom of the past beats the latest expert opinion, hands down

* Chaucer: Chivalry is one of the great inventions of Western culture, and it�s contributed enormously to women�s happiness

* Christopher Marlowe: Being �transgressive� will take you only so far -- in art, and in life

* Shakespeare�s tragedies: Some choices are inherently destructive (it�s just built into the nature of things)

* Shakespeare�s comedies: Our human nature -- including even the very limitations that define it -- is a rich source of happiness

* Shakespeare�s Sonnets: Love and sex are serious things. If you treat them lightly, someone�s going to get hurt

* Milton: Our intellectual freedoms are Christian, not anti-Christian, in origin

* English literature of the Enlightenment: Realism, common sense, and good humor are more dignified equipment for life than victim politics, wishful thinking, and liberal guilt

* The Romantic poets: Intelligent radicals become conservatives when they grow up -- make that, if they grow up

* Wordsworth and Coleridge: The difference between entertainment that degrades and entertainment that refreshes and ennobles

* Byron and Shelley: The human mind has enormous creative powers -- which, if abused, can be terribly destructive

* Jane Austen: Social conventions exist for our (mainly women�s) protection -- and most men would be improved if they were more patriarchal than they actually are

* Dickens: Reformers can do more harm than the injustices they set out to reform. And charity begins at home

* Avant-garde and modernist literature: Christianity trumps the edgy art world

* Evelyn Waugh: Without religion, human beings are disgustingly selfish and shallow -- and in abandoning Christianity, our culture will shrivel and die

* T. S. Eliot: Tradition is necessary to culture

* Hawthorne, Melville, Poe, and Twain: Evil isn�t �back there� or �out there�; it�s in the human heart

* William Faulkner (and Southern literature in general): Civilization is valuable. A fatally flawed culture beats no culture at all

* Flannery O�Connor: Even modern American liberals aren�t immune to original sin

�What all these lessons have in common,� writes Dr. Kantor, �is that it�s hard to imagine politically correct English professors� being pleased that their students might learn them. . . . . The one lesson that you can�t learn from great English and American literature is the politically correct point of view: the idea that the culture of the West is nothing but a source of injustice, and that only perpetual vigilance against all its �isms� and �phobias� can protect us against the return of oppression and misery.�

�Truly offensive -- in the best sense of the word�

"A refreshing antidote to the academic brew that has defaced our literature and diminished our culture." -- David Horowitz, bestselling author of The Professors and founder of the David Horowitz Freedom Center

"This guide to literature is truly offensive �- in the best sense of the word. It goes on the attack; it pulls no punches; and it takes no prisoners. It shows that great literature conveys great truths, and that literature like truth is timeless in its applicability. As such, all genuine lovers of literature will salute this great and gritty guide." -- JOSEPH PEARCE, Writer in Residence and Professor of Literature, Ave Maria University, and author of many literary biographies, including The Unmasking of Oscar Wilde and Tolkien: Man and Myth

"Elizabeth Kantor's robust and refreshingly honest survey will remind scholars and students alike of what everyone should know (but what most students have a hard time knowing thanks to edited-down curricula and censorious professors)." -- Kevin Cope, professor of English, Louisiana State University

"This marvelous book is part demolition job, part reconstruction effort. Kantor takes readers on an entertaining (if also horrifying) tour of the politically correct menagerie now in charge of literature departments across the country. The result is a wise and sobering book that is required reading for anyone who cares about the future of the humanities." -- Roger Kimball, co-editor and publisher, The New Criterion.

Human Events Online
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,198 • Replies: 11
No top replies

 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Nov, 2006 03:46 am
Some of that I agree with. But there's an enormous amount of right-wing Christian bull*hit in that article as well.
0 Replies
 
princesspupule
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Dec, 2006 01:21 am
This looks like an interesting book; I'll have to check it out. Mahalo nui loa for bringing it to my attention.

MA, the christian b.s... is it in the article or the book? I rather think it's the book and its premise rather than the article... And honestly, western culture has be shaped and defined by christianity for the better part of the past thousand years. How would you get away from that?
0 Replies
 
Shapeless
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Dec, 2006 02:17 pm
Re: The Politically Incorrect Guide to English&American
Quote:
* T. S. Eliot: Tradition is necessary to culture


Wouldn't it be great if that's all Eliot was saying? Then it would be much easier to stomach his insinuations, in both his poetry and his prose, that the "modernizing" Jews are responsible for the decline of classical culture. If this review is accurate, then Kantor must be quite the optimist.


princesspupule wrote:
And honestly, western culture has be shaped and defined by christianity for the better part of the past thousand years. How would you get away from that?


I don't imagine anyone is trying to deny this. But I think the point of what the reviewer is calling "English departments with radical agendas" is that this history has had a lot of horrific as well as beautiful moments. I'm not quite seeing both sides of this story coming out in what the reviewer has written.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Dec, 2006 02:41 pm
Well this is quite a crock.

I earned my undergraduate degree in English at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, a hotbed of liberalism, right smack dab in the middle of the height of PC (1989-1993). I've read every single one of those books*, and they were all assigned reading.


*Although I don't know what any part of this sentence is supposed to mean:

Elizabeth Kantor wrote:
Avant-garde and modernist literature: Christianity trumps the edgy art world


Which avant-garde and modernist literature says that, exactly? Surely not every single book in that genre?
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Dec, 2006 03:23 pm
As others have noted, the one-sentence summaries are almost comical. Reminds me of high school English: "OK class, what was the theme of this story?"

And they wonder why kids hate required reading...
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Dec, 2006 06:30 pm
My problem with the book as described, and -- by extension -- the article is that the author has an obvious agenda. In its own way, the approach is just as PC (but Christian-oriented here) as the so-called PC revisionism.

Mele Kalimaka, princesspupule.
0 Replies
 
Shapeless
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Dec, 2006 07:06 pm
Quote:
And they wonder why kids hate required reading...


Indeed. There may have been a time when passive awe was a perfectly fulfilling way to engage with "high art," but if the goal of English departments is to get students to appreciate literary works, it simply no longer suffices to tell students to just read them and then bask in their glory. I would hope that students want something a little more critically engaging than that. The irony of the review is that it suggests the "non-PC" approach to literature will enhance students' ability to see through various agendas, at the same time that it encourages them to accept the received wisdom of the canon without question. (Or, as the review puts it, "The wisdom of the past beats the latest expert opinion, hands down.")
0 Replies
 
bisca
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Dec, 2006 09:01 pm
Kantor is quite correct. Someone wrote that there was a great deal of right wing Christian Bullsh*t in her outline. Is that counterposed to the great dealof left wing Relativistic Bullsh*t?

Sure, one can nit-pick( Eliot's Anti-Semitism, for example) but Shakespeare alone is worth all of the left wing Politically Correct garbage that passes for literature these days.

One cannot read the crap written by most of the "feminist" authors after reading even one of Shakespeare's lesser plays without being aware of a giant among pygmies.

The propagandistic victimology alluded to in the works of Toni Morison shows just how far modern literature has fallen/ However, it is not considered Politically Correct to critique a "black" writer. That is why our culture must endure the mindless rap which pollutes our airways.

We nned more people like Kantor to lead us out of Politically Correct agendas and back to the great art as exemplified by the finest writer the world has ever known= William Shakespeare.
0 Replies
 
Shapeless
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Dec, 2006 09:19 pm
Quote:
However, it is not considered Politically Correct to critique a "black" writer. That is why our culture must endure the mindless rap which pollutes our airways.


Quote:
We nned more people like Kantor to lead us out of Politically Correct agendas and back to the great art as exemplified by the finest writer the world has ever known= William Shakespeare.


In other words, some writers get to be immune to critique, but not others. Anyone is perfectly free to believe that, of course, and to apply this criterion to whomever they want. It's an approach that more or less defines the hero-worship approach to literature and the arts, though I don't know of many "Politically Correct" scholars who actively deny the quality of Shakespeare. But it's quite astounding to see how personally hero-worship scholars take it when others are curious about the standards by which critique-immunity are applied. It is a question that the hero-worship approach to literature takes no interest in. For the student who wants to examine how the Western canon was decided, Kantor might not have much to offer.
0 Replies
 
bisca
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Dec, 2006 09:37 pm
Anyone who is serious about learning about the "Canon" must read the definitive works of Harold Bloom--One of the US's oustanding literary critics and authority on the Canon.

He exposes the Political Correctness which places deconstuctionist garbage above the giants of literature. Only immature teen agers believe that only art created while they are living is the greatest art of all time.
0 Replies
 
Shapeless
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Dec, 2006 09:46 pm
bisca wrote:
Anyone who is serious about learning about the "Canon" must read the definitive works of Harold Bloom--One of the US's oustanding literary critics and authority on the Canon.


"Authority" is the perfect word, since no one guards the canon more defensively than Bloom. What is it about historical contingency that hero-worship scholars find so threatening? I am genuinely curious.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » The Politically Incorrect Guide to English&American Lit
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.97 seconds on 01/22/2025 at 08:02:10