Reply Fri 1 Sep, 2006 03:45 pm
By Paul Andrew Bourne


THE TOURISM PRODUCT, 2004: CRISES, CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES (Excerpt)

Paul Andrew Bourne, M.Sc.; B.Sc. (Hons.); Dip. Edu.



INTRODUCTION



Boxill in a ?'UWI Public Lecture Series' in Montego Bay on ?'Tourism and Development in Jamaica' posited that ". . . tourism is one of the world's largest industries and also that the Caribbean is the most tourism-dependent region in the world" (2003, 1). Blake (2002) concurred with Boxill that tourism is important to Jamaica and Mexico. She said, "Over the last thirty years both countries have experienced tremendous growth within the tourism sector" (Blake 2002, p.64). The tourism-product in respect to tourists is disaggregate into 24 percent from Europe, 53 percent from the United States (Boxill, 2003, 2) and in Jamaica, 70 percent of the visitors are from the US market (Boxill, 2003, 5). With this situation, the Jamaican space of the product must be analyzed from a socioeconomic perspective.


"The economic gap between rich and poor countries has widened over the past ten years. However, to create new industries and to transform rural life in Asian, African and the Caribbean and Latin American countries is a gigantic task. The relevance of tourism to this situation is that income from international travel can bring the foreign exchange essential for major investment. There is a widespread awareness of the potential benefits, but little has been done in practice to provide the means for expansion of tourism plant in most of the developing areas of the world. The potential benefits to developing countries may be apparent to many, but discussion of them is invariably confused. Proponents of tourist expansion in developing countries point to the foreign exchange receipts generated by tourism, or a more sophisticated level, to the impact of these foreign exchange receipts on gross domestic product either directly, or through the operation of the expenditure multiplier. On the other hand, critics of tourism expansion point to the various social strains which are caused by tourism development, example being the distortion of indigenous cultural expressions, the conversion of small farmers into wage labourers due to the high land prices which tourism creates and associated alienation of land, perpetuation of racial inequalities and the erosion of dignity." (Bryden, 1973)



Bryden's analytical outlook provides an in-depth academic assessment of the tourism product, which is within the purview of sustainable tourism development. He has encapsulated the pre-1980 and the post-1980 schools of thought in number of succinctly coined sentences. He offered to the discourse a slant that is primarily non-economic, and void of political misnomers. This astute scholar penned a rationale that disaggregated the contributions, the challenges and the alternatives of the post-1980 scholars. Tourism, therefore, is broader than the all-inclusive properties being publicized by many pre-1980 people (large investors), who continue to advocate for seclusion of the visitors as against holistic tourism product. The product is more than property modernization, its contributions to gross domestic product's (GDP), and the employment of human resources, the needed foreign receipts, and any economic multiplier theorizing that some may argue. As rightfully forwarded by Bryden, the commodity must include the social inequalities, the cultural pluralism that it creates, the social ills (for example, HIV/AIDS), social conflicts due to the perception of beneficiaries, the non-transformation of colonial system in administration of the package and the dislocation of many people from there normal existence. The product within the last two decades is simply not about the ?'glamorous' economic benefits as some argue but the product subsumed the environment, the human resources, the economic activities and the social arrangements of people.

Many authors fail to highlight a number of social issues that have arisen as a result of the tourism product as though the negatives are not apart of the package. The new tourism is highly dependent on the quality of the environment for survivability, and this reality takes with it socio-biological dislocations. Policy-makers in developing countries oftentimes overlook this, which is at the detriment of the society. This article will not conceptualize the tourism product as the pre-1980 scholars but will present an outlook within the vantage point of sustainable tourism development. The author will charter a path for the future and analyze the present aspect of the product as well as review the product up this point.


OPPORTUNITIES



Economic


The single most valued contributor to economic growth and economic development, employment, social services, foreign exchange receipts and taxation revenues to the Jamaican economy leading up to the early1980s was the bauxite and alumina industry [?'56 percentage points of exporting earnings during 1960 - 1975' - (Freckleton, 1993, p.122)]. This twin sector was adversely affected by ?'sluggish' prices in the world market during the period 1975-1988, and this resulted in the declining output of this industry. Prior to the period 1960-1975 the island's major traditional exports foreign exchange earning were in sugar and banana. ?'In case of sugar, export volume in 1988 was 41 % less than in 1975, while banana exports in 1988 were 65% less than in 1975' (Freckleton, 1993, p.122). Since the late 1980s, the tourism industry has overtaken its predecessor in terms of contributions to many economic indicators. The Jamaica economy was undergoing negative external shocks since the 1970s, when the ?'big price increases in oil and other imported goods, wide swings in primary commodity prices' (Girvan, 1993, p.110), and brought with it balance of payment difficulties. Freckleton discovered that during the period 1975-1988 that imports of raw materials stood at 80 percentage points of imports and if this holds constant to day, with the declining in the traditional industries, the island had to diversify its products offerings. This has seen a thrust in direct investment by way of increases in hotel infrastructure development, construction of private dwellings, businesses, and employment generation, increased commercialization in many localities, and a number of changes in rural communities. Many of those areas are in Montego Bay, Ocho Rios and Negril, and they are referred to as resort towns. Resort towns are defined as major tourist areas (Stone, 1999, p.1).

Despite the accelerated growth trends in Jamaica's tourism resort towns, post-1980, there has been an agenda of complaints and criticisms surrounding the spread of benefits (Stone, 1991). From Boxill's presentation at the ?'UWI Public Lecture Series', two important social realities explain the allocation of benefits; this is due to one the all-inclusive market and the typology of the individuals. Boxill (2003) posited, "One very significant factor about the all-inclusive is that it has catered primarily to American visitors" (p. 6). He continued, "Importantly tourists are much more likely to explore the destination on their own and make greater contact with the local communities than the American tourists. Their dollar trends to percolate much more throughout the economy that the American tourists" (p.7). In addition, the ecological costs imposed by that industry on local communities and the domination of the earnings by big hoteliers, and the exclusive all-inclusive hotels, are generating increasingly more resentment on the part of local vendors, craft producers, small entrepreneurs and even hotel workers (Stone, 1991). Notwithstanding those realities, tourism has drastically changed its traditional construct from when it blossomed into existence in the early 1980s. The product now incorporates community tourism, health tourism, eco-tourism, heritage tourism and cultural tourism but many people still place emphasis on the old economic indicators. "A survey of West German travelers revealed, that the experience of nature, clean air and a pollution-free environment were among the most important reasons for taking their main holiday journey in 1986" (Poon, 1993).

Goldsmith (1990) postulated that the benefits of tourism for any developing country are many but he argued within the construct of the pre-1980 school of thought. He argued that the product is analyzed within these themes:
 a contribution to the Balance of Payment in the form of hard currency - US dollars, Pound sterling and Canadian dollars;
 the dispersion of development to non-industrial regions;
 the creation of employment opportunities;
 the effect on general economic development through the multiplier effects;
 the social benefits arising from a widening of people's interest generally in world affairs and to new understanding of "foreigners and foreign tastes".


Goldsmith's postulation is used as the basis for presenting the economic indicators of the tourism product on the Jamaican economy. Over a decade (1994-2004), the tourists' expenditure from stopover in Jamaica increased by 47.68 percentage points. In 1994, the tourism sector contributed US $973,000,000 to Jamaica's Balance of Payment whereas in 1995, the figure rose by 9.867 percentage points to US $1,069,000,000 and a further increase of 5.519 percentage points over the following year (Table 1). It should be noted that in 1997, the tourist expenditure rose marginally by 1.064 percentage points but a fourfold increase was in 1998 over the previous year. In 1998, the figure for expenditure in Jamaica by stopover tourists showed an incremental increase of 3.09 percentage points over 1997 but drastic increase followed the year after by 8.1 percent. There were two ironies in expenditure by stopover tourists. They were, firstly, in 2001, receipts fell by approximately 8.0 percentage points over the previous year in comparison to a negative 2.8 percentage points change in 2002 over 2001 and secondly, 13.2 percentage points increase in 2003. The latter value represents the highest increase in expenditure and the former indicates the periods with the only negative change.

On a point of emphasis, the Economic Impact Study that was commissioned by the Organization of American States (OAS) and completed in 1994, found that 37.7 percentage points of the foreign exchange receipts that was received by Jamaica is spent directly on imports. Furthermore, the inflows of foreign exchange from the tourism sector have been one major contribution to the Balance of Payments that has aided in the payments for other imported items. Many authors argue that this source of funds has resulted in the provision of employment for many residents, and is responsible for the development of some rural communities. On other matter, the internal migration to many urban centres from rural Jamaica according to some sociologists has been due largely to the downsizing of the bauxite sector, the shift from agriculture to a service oriented economy and the perception of privilege within urban areas. Moreover, in rural Jamaica, presently the tourism industry mainly has been the main employer of people and so this explains the mass exodus of people to the outskirts of resort towns.

CHALLENGES



Economic realities:

Tourism is currently one of the most important and sought after items in the international marketplace. It is the ultimate immaterial reward after the achievement of work and other material acquisitions in life. Tourism is also highly sensitive to increases in income. This means that the higher the income level, the higher the inclination toward rest, relaxation, recuperation, run and roti- most of which have become synonymous with holiday (Poon, 1993, p.263).


Poon's argument encapsulated the essence of the tourism product. With the position, nevertheless, is the economic reality that product is "highly sensitive" to changes in income. This matter provides a justification for the rationale of a package that will supply the expected demand of the tourists. Despite the economic argument that the product is highly income-elastic, there are a number of economic consequences from the existence of this item.

One author suggested that the non-business international visitor arrivals are highly income-elastic and may justify the high responsiveness of the tourism sector to internal and external conditions. Again, the incident in September 11, 2002 explains another chapter in the low visitor arrivals to the island. The purported argumentations are further justification as an explanation for the low tourist arrivals in 1998. The information in Table 1 concurs with income elasticity of the tourism product (in 1998), and so justifies 5.3 percentage points decline in cruise ship passengers and decrease in non-resident Jamaicans by 9.2 percentage points although foreign national increased by 3.95 percentage points. This continues to explain the fallout in visitor arrivals whenever there are incidents in America and Britain, and justifies reduction tourists' expenditure in the same vain.

In Jamaica where nearly everything including foodstuff, beverages, furniture and building supplies, toiletries, and lining are imported, perhaps less than 25 percentage points of the tourist's dollar remains in the economy (Lundberg, 1974, p.121). He forwarded the perspective that in well-developed areas, tourism might enrich the community by providing additional shops, theatres and restaurants but the widespread socio-economic benefits are marginal. However, the permanent residents are not offered the entertainment and other social graces that come with this option of advancement for tourist, as they are oftentimes unable to afford those social developments. Small areas are given roads, adequate water supply and other utilities while the rest of the community remains as it was before, starved of socio-economic development. Montego Bay attests to this argumentation, in that in close proximity to the well-developed tourist resorts, a robust squatter settlement thrives thereby.

During 1996, the Tourism Product Development Company Limited (TPDCo) through the Sustaining the Environment and Tourism (SET) project made several improvements to Jamaica's Tourism product. The works that were done under this venture focused on the major resort town and excluded many of the ?'small areas' that are adjacent to the activities. The activities include sidewalk repairs and upgrades, tree planting, drain cleaning. Painting of buildings, maintenance works, round-a-bout beautifications, beach cleaning and installations of directional markers, and regulatory and safety signs. The Gleaner and the wired media have visited those localities in which they show people in the ?'small' areas without proper sanitary conveniences, people not having piped water; massive dilapidated zinc fencing, unpaved tracks, stolen electricity and children playing in the streets without shoes on their feet, and some children wore tattered and torn clothing. One scholar called that experience "splendor residing close to squalor". This situation spreads across the entire tourist destination in Jamaica.

Thomas (1988), a scholar, who wrote on the tourism product, penned a fitting summary of the situation in Jamaica. He forwarded the argumentation that:

The harsh reality therefore remains. Plush tourist facilities coexist with depressed rural areas, unemployment, poverty and urban slums. The contrast is a constant reminder that enclave tourism is mutually negative - negative in terms of its local impact and negative for tourists themselves. The results is that the development of the industry, at huge financial and social costs, has in the long-run contributed little towards the permanent eradication of the widespread poverty and powerless ness of the West Indian people (Thomas, 1988 in "Poor and Powerless")

Thomas' viewpoint highlight that the people who reside in close proximity to resort towns are highly likely to harass the visitors to our shores as they seek to "heek out" a living form themselves. This practice is the best bet situation that will allow many of those residents to provide for themselves and their families. The happenings are not likely to cease as many of the ?'hustlers' either work in homes of the affluent and do experience some situations that sparkle a sense of resentment of the surrounding when this is compared with their social realities. Furthermore, many locals do not see themselves as beneficiaries of the economic and social wealth of the tourism product, and so demand some of the remains of the plush development in the resort towns.



WORKING BIOLIOGRAPHY


Alleyne, D. & I. Boxill. (2003). "The Impact of Crime on Tourist Arrivals in Jamaica." International Journal of Tourism Research, 5, 381-391.

Boxill, I. (2003). Tourism and development in Jamaica; UWI Public Lecture Series. Mona, Kingston: University of the West Indies.

______. (1995). "Crime and sustainable development in Jamaica. University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica: Unpublished research paper.

Boxill, I. & E. Hernandez. (2002). "How tourism transforms language: The case of Playa Delk Carmen, Mexico". Social and Economic Studies, vol. 51, no.1.

Blake, P. (2002). "Tourism and cultural change in Jamaica and Mexico". Ideaz, vol. 1, no. 1.Kingston: University Printery.

Bryden, J. (1973). Tourism and development: A case study of the Commonwealth Caribbean. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Caribbean Program Coordination, CPC Barbados. (2000). A Portrait of Adolescent Health in the Caribbean, 2000. Projects on Development and Integral Health of Adolescents and Youth in LAC W.K. Kellogg Foundation.

Dunn, L & H. Dunn. (2002). People and Tourism: Issues and Attitudes to Tourism and Tourists in the Jamaican Hospitality Industry. Kingston: Arawak Publications

________________. (1994). "Report on visitor harassment and attitudes to tourism and tourists in Negril". Kingston: Jamaica Tourist Board & Tourism Action Plan.

Freckleton, M. (1993). Jamaica's balance of payment performance 1975 - 1988. (Editors): Stanley, L and Marie Freckleton. Caribbean economic development. Kingston, Jamaica: Ian Randle Publisher

Girvan, N. (1993). The debt problem of the Caribbean and Central America: An overview1. (Editors): Stanley, L and Marie Freckleton. Caribbean economic development. Kingston, Jamaica: Ian Randle Publisher

Goldsmith, William W. (1990). The Impact of the Tourism and Travel industry on a developing Regional Economy. Xerographic Process.

Harrison, D. (1992). Tourism and the less developed countries. London: Belhaven Press.

Lowe, H et al. (2000). Discovering the future, the emergence, development and the future of science and technology in Jamaica. Kingston, Jamaica: Canoe Press.

Lundberg, Donald E. (1974). The tourist business. (2nd edition). Hollywood, United States: Cahner Publishing.

Taylor, F. (1975). Jamaica- The welcoming society myths and reality. Kingston, Jamaica: ISER, University of the West Indies.

Thomas, Clive Y. (1988). The poor and the powerless, economic policy and change in the Caribbean. Latin American Bureau

Planning Institute of Jamaica. (1994 - 2004). Economic and Social Survey Jamaica. Kingston, Jamaica: Planning Institute of Jamaica.

Poon, A. (1993). Caribbean tourism and the World Economy. (Editors): Stanley, L and Marie Freckleton. Caribbean economic development. Kingston, Jamaica: Ian Randle Publisher

Shaw, S. (2001). NRCA summons Rose Hall development. (Observer staff reporter, Wednesday, March7, 2001). Kingston, Jamaica: Jamaica Observer.

Spinard, K et al. (1982). Tourism in the Caribbean: The economic impact. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre.

Stone, C. (1991). Caribbean affairs. (January - March 1991, No.1, Volume 2).

McFarlane, C et al. (1997). Reproductive health survey Jamaica 1997. Kingston, Jamaica: National Family Planning Board, February 1999.

Munroe, T. (2001). An introduction to politics. (4th ed). Kingston, Jamaica: Canoe Press.

Nejkov, Dunsan & Nesci, M. (1974). Cooperation among developing countries in the field of tourism. Ljubljana, Yugoslavia: Research Centre for cooperation with developing countries.

Nordenberg, T.(2003). Quick cure, fight against ?'Silent' STD includes new screening test, one-dose drugs.

Gleaner. (2001). Editorial. (Tuesday, February 20, 2001). Kingston, Jamaica: Gleaner.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,888 • Replies: 0
No top replies

 
 

Related Topics

Spiegel Banner Ads - Discussion by cjhsa
Cartoons - Discussion by gollum
What is celebrity endorsement? - Discussion by LA girl1994
Is misleading advertizing a crime? - Question by Rickoshay75
Brand names for Solar products? - Question by kittycat94
Make some friends - Discussion by moody003
fob with t/t payment - Question by mjn
Logo design -- offensive or not? - Question by boomerang
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Tourism
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/16/2026 at 05:07:13