1
   

Twin Living Inside a Man for 36 Years

 
 
Reyn
 
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 05:22 pm
Quote:
A Pregnant Man?

Another Person Lived Inside a Man for Nearly Four Decades
Aug. 23, 2006 ?- - Sanju Bhagat's stomach was once so swollen he looked nine months pregnant and could barely breathe.

Living in the city of Nagpur, India, Bhagat said he'd felt self-conscious his whole life about his big belly. But one night in June 1999, his problem erupted into something much larger than cosmetic worry.

An ambulance rushed the 36-year-old farmer to the hospital. Doctors thought he might have a giant tumor, so they decided to operate and remove the source of the bulge in his belly.

"Basically, the tumor was so big that it was pressing on his diaphragm and that's why he was very breathless," said Dr. Ajay Mehta of Tata Memorial Hospital in Mumbai. "Because of the sheer size of the tumor, it makes it difficult [to operate]. We anticipated a lot of problems."

Mehta said that he can usually spot a tumor just after he begins an operation. But while operating on Bhagat, Mehta saw something he had never encountered. As he cut deeper into Bhagat's stomach, gallons of fluid spilled out -- and then something extraordinary happened.

"To my surprise and horror, I could shake hands with somebody inside," he said. "It was a bit shocking for me."

Removing the Mutated Body

One doctor recalled that day in the operating room.

"He just put his hand inside and he said there are a lot of bones inside," she said. "First, one limb came out, then another limb came out. Then some part of genitalia, then some part of hair, some limbs, jaws, limbs, hair."

Inside Bhagat's stomach was a strange, half-formed creature that had feet and hands that were very developed. Its fingernails were quite long.

"We were horrified. We were confused and amazed," Mehta said.

A Mutated Body Within a Body

At first glance, it may look as if Bhagat had given birth. Actually, Mehta had removed the mutated body of Bhagat's twin brother from his stomach. Bhagat, they discovered, had one of the world's most bizarre medical conditions -- fetus in fetu. It is an extremely rare abnormality that occurs when a fetus gets trapped inside its twin. The trapped fetus can survive as a parasite even past birth by forming an umbilical cordlike structure that leaches its twin's blood supply until it grows so large that it starts to harm the host, at which point doctors usually intervene.

According to Mehta, there are fewer than 90 cases of fetus in fetu recorded in medical literature.

Fetus in fetu happens very early in a twin pregnancy, when one fetus wraps around and envelops the other. The dominant fetus grows, while the fetus that would have been its twin lives on throughout the pregnancy, feeding off its host twin like a kind of parasite. Usually, both twins die before birth from the strain of sharing a placenta.

Sometimes, however, as in Bhagat's case, the host twin survives and is delivered. What makes his case so unusual is that no one suspected Bhagat had a twin inside him for 36 years.

Bhagat said he was very much relieved after his operation. He was not interested in knowing what Mehta did to him or seeing what he had removed from his abdomen.

"He didn't want to see it because it was looking very ghastly," Mehta said.

Avoiding the Gory Details

There was no placenta inside Bhagat -- the enveloped parasitic twin had connected directly to Bhagat's blood supply. Right after the surgery, Bhagat's pain and inability to breathe disappeared and he recovered immediately.

The case may have been a medical miracle to doctors, but to Bhagat his condition had been a source of shame and misery. All his life, people in the village where he lived had mercilessly teased him and told him he looked pregnant. Ironically, they were right in a way.

Today Bhagat is in good health and leads a normal life, but he still gets teased occasionally.

"They still ridicule him. What they say is, you went for an operation and you had the baby," Mehta said.

source also contains video of the patient

I saw this story on PrimeTime Medical Mysteries. Amazing and worth your while to have a look.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 5,299 • Replies: 23
No top replies

 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 05:32 pm
My pot bellied step dad always told those who implied he might be pregnant, "It's a baby elephant. Want to see the trunk?"
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 05:48 pm
Oooo, I dunno about that.

Did you see the video?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 05:54 pm
Innards and body parts make me queasy.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 07:20 pm
there's a video?
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 07:28 pm
eesh, there IS a video.
0 Replies
 
Chai
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 07:28 pm
Yeah, it's right after the tidy cat commercial....


ewww....knarly.



I've heard of this before...I watched one of those medical shows where a boy had something removed...a lot of hair and nail and flesh...but you could still tell it was something that had started out developing, then stopped.
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 07:52 pm
As I mentioned, I saw the whole report on Primetime. It was hard to believe that this "body" had been alive growing within this poor chap. It didn't look like much, all mutated and whatnot. Quite large.
0 Replies
 
makemeshiver33
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 08:38 pm
I watched it too Reyn, that was the nastiest thing I have ever seen...here lately. GROSS.........

It was one of them things you didn't want to see, but couldn't help but look at. Sorry I did....


Grostesque long nails, somewhat hairy, partly decomposed body.... Confused
0 Replies
 
blacksmithn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 09:47 pm
Sounds like my ex-wife... Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Aug, 2006 07:35 am
Heh...

makemeshiver33 wrote:
partly decomposed body...


That's part of what I don't get. It was alive for a while -- was it alive when it was removed? Was the fact that it died the reason that after 36 years it was such a problem? (Having an enormous amount of dead tissue inside of you has to be even worse than having an enormous amount of living tissue...) I know it says that it was pressing on his diaphragm and that was the problem, just curious about the alive/dead issue.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Aug, 2006 07:35 am
(Oh and the "heh" is directed to blacksmithn)
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Aug, 2006 08:20 am
sozobe wrote:
Heh...

makemeshiver33 wrote:
partly decomposed body...


That's part of what I don't get. It was alive for a while -- was it alive when it was removed? Was the fact that it died the reason that after 36 years it was such a problem? (Having an enormous amount of dead tissue inside of you has to be even worse than having an enormous amount of living tissue...) I know it says that it was pressing on his diaphragm and that was the problem, just curious about the alive/dead issue.


It lived...prolly got too big for its blood supply, or somesuch, and died.

Not much of a life.....
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Aug, 2006 10:03 am
No, I don't think so. As far as I can tell for the Primetime show, "it" was still "living" and growing. It was still syphoning blood away from the patient.
0 Replies
 
Slappy Doo Hoo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Aug, 2006 11:13 am
I would have stuffed it and proudly placed it on my wall.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Aug, 2006 11:24 am
"He's not heavy, he's my brother...."
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Aug, 2006 11:27 am
So, they killed it after it came out? It died when it came out? I was wondering the same things, Soz.
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Aug, 2006 11:31 am
From what I could gather, once it was removed from the blood supply, it would have died. It did not look humanoid at all though, in case you were wondering. Terribly mutated.
0 Replies
 
Swimpy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Aug, 2006 12:07 pm
The right to lifers could have a field day with this story.
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Aug, 2006 12:59 pm
I'm not quite sure what you would have called "it" though.
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Twin Living Inside a Man for 36 Years
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/16/2026 at 01:11:04