1
   

Cemetery To Dig Up 1,000 Pets To Bury Humans

 
 
Reyn
 
Reply Sun 18 Jun, 2006 09:27 am
Of course something like this is a traumatic experience, but I wonder why more do not chose cremation. In my opinion, cemeteries are not good land use, whether they be for humans or pets.

I've seen nicely done walls with plaques on which can house the ashes for memorial purposes.

For myself, I'm having my ashes scattered.


Cemetery To Dig Up 1,000 Pets To Bury Humans

(AP) COLMA, Calif. Nila Negri grieved her two dogs and a cat years ago, when they were buried at the lone pet cemetery among 17 human graveyards in this town known as the "City of Souls."

Now she is back at the Pet's Rest cemetery, sitting on a gravestone, head in hands.

Some 1,000 animals buried here have to be dug up and moved because they were buried on leased property, and the landowner, a local real estate firm, wants to use it for human graves.

For Negri and the other owners, the prospect of seeing the animals exhumed stirred up grief they thought had been put to rest.

"I don't want anybody touching my pets," said Negri, who has lived in San Francisco since 1949.

Nearby, piles of freshly turned earth and cracked stone slabs marked places where animals had recently been removed, and a miniature coffin scarred with rust sat in the grass.

Pet's Rest owner Phillip C'de Baca sent letters in May to the pet owners buried at the graveyard's eastern end, giving them 15 days to choose between two free options: relocation or cremation.

Frantic pet owners recently staged a rally at the cemetery, and they are exploring legal options to stop the exhumations, said Cathryn Hrudicka, whose buried her dog Poquito at Pet's Rest.

"At no time was I told he was being buried on leased land," said Hrudicka, 53.

C'de Baca said he thought he'd be given the chance to buy the land once the lease was up. But the owner, the Cypress Abbey real estate firm, plans to use it as a human cemetery, said its attorney David J. Friedenberg.

"They've been waiting to get their property back," he said.

According to the lease agreement, Pet's Rest was required to notify everyone with animals buried on the leased land that "all rights of interment" would expire on May 19. Many with animals buried there said they were never notified.

California has no state regulations governing pet cemeteries, said Kevin Flanagan, a spokesman for the state's cemetery and funeral bureau.

Grief counselors who deal with pet loss say mourning a pet is as natural as mourning a person.

"It's like losing another child," said Dr. Carol A. Brothers, a clinical psychologist who specializes in grief and trauma. But, she said, "it's a disenfranchised grief."

Negri's cocker spaniel Rusty, her poodle Gigi, and her cat Morden are among the 13,000 animals buried at Pet's Rest. Her husband and parents are also buried in the city, which became a magnet for cemeteries after a San Francisco law passed in 1900 prohibited the burial of human remains within city limits.

Negri said she didn't get a letter from C'de Baca but came anyway to make sure her pets weren't affected.

She came out of the cemetery office smiling. Her pets could continue to rest in peace, she said.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 505 • Replies: 10
No top replies

 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jun, 2006 03:48 pm
I would also prefer cremation but it would be nice to see a headstone saying "NickFun lives and everyone loves him".
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jun, 2006 04:18 pm
Well, your relatives and loved ones can get you one of those plaques. Maybe not quite the same, but looks good as well, as you can see.

http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h246/Reyn2244/bear2.jpg
0 Replies
 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jun, 2006 05:19 pm
I'm a pretty good archer too!
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jun, 2006 05:30 pm
Give me a few more years before you put my head on one of those.
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jun, 2006 05:33 pm
Cremation or burial?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jun, 2006 05:35 pm
I prefer cremation, but will leave it up to my wife.
0 Replies
 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jun, 2006 06:10 pm
Careful Edgar -- she may decide to have you stuffed and mounted!
0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jun, 2006 06:14 pm
NickFun wrote:
Careful Edgar -- she may decide to have you stuffed and mounted!

Laughing Laughing I wonder if that's legal?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jun, 2006 06:23 pm
Reyn wrote:
Well, your relatives and loved ones can get you one of those plaques. Maybe not quite the same, but looks good as well, as you can see.

I want to be buried. I'm glad, although I cant really go there anymore now that I've moved countries, that I have a grave, not just a plaque or an urn, to go back to if I want to visit my mother. She has a beautiful, rugged stone that organically fits in the surroundings. Its on hilly woodland by the dunes - there's trees, rustling leaves. We've planted plants, flowers. It's a place of her own. A plaque on a wall - eh.

I get what you're saying, though - I know it's not a sensible choice, in this time of overpopulation. Space is scarce. Then again, cemeteries are beautiful refuges of calm and meditation, in the middle of bustling cities. That must count for something, too. And there's plants and flowers and trees, and birds. Cant be too environmentally unfriendly..
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jun, 2006 06:27 pm
Re: Cemetery To Dig Up 1,000 Pets To Bury Humans
Quote:
Pet's Rest owner Phillip C'de Baca sent letters in May to the pet owners buried at the graveyard's eastern end, giving them 15 days to choose between two free options: relocation or cremation.

The whole concept of a pet cemetary strikes me as a bit odd.. but 15 days notice, damn, thats harsh.
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Cemetery To Dig Up 1,000 Pets To Bury Humans
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 10/01/2024 at 07:32:27