0
   

Spamming the spammers can backfire

 
 
sumac
 
Reply Wed 17 May, 2006 09:38 am

In the Fight Against Spam E-Mail, Goliath Wins Again


"Eran Reshef had an idea in the battle against spam e-mail that seemed to be working: he fought spam with spam. Today, he'll give up the fight.

Reshef's Silicon Valley company, Blue Security Inc., simply asked the spammers to stop sending junk e-mail to his clients. But because those sort of requests tend to be ignored, Blue Security took them to a new level: it bombarded the spammers with requests from all 522,000 of its customers at the same time.

That led to a flood of Internet traffic so heavy that it disrupted the spammers' ability to send e-mails to other victims -- a crippling effect that caused a handful of known spammers to comply with the requests.

Then, earlier this month, a Russia-based spammer counterattacked, Reshef said. Using tens of thousands of hijacked computers, the spammer flooded Blue Security with so much Internet traffic that it blocked legitimate visitors from going to Bluesecurity.com, as well as to other Web sites. The spammer also sent another message: Cease operations or Blue Security customers will soon find themselves targeted with virus-filled attacks.

Today, Reshef will wave a virtual white flag and surrender. The company will shut down this morning and its Web site will display a message informing its customers about the closure.

"It's clear to us that [quitting] would be the only thing to prevent a full-scale cyber-war that we just don't have the authority to start," Reshef said. "Our users never signed up for this kind of thing."

Security experts say the move marks a disheartening development in the ongoing battle by computer users, online businesses and law enforcement against those who clutter e-mail inboxes with a continuous glut of ads for drugs, porn and get-rich-quick schemes. According to Symantec Corp., maker of the popular Norton antivirus software products, more than 50 percent of all e-mail sent in the latter half of 2005 was spam.

Alan Paller, director of research for the Bethesda-based SANS Institute, a computer security training group, said extortion attacks have exploded in the past few years. With Blue Security, Paller said, the attackers' extortionist demands were that the company merely stop interfering in a multimillion-dollar spam operation.

"We're hearing from federal law enforcement that they are getting more than one new case of online extortion each day," Paller said.

The spammer's counterattack generated so much Internet traffic that it also affected other sites, including Six Apart Ltd., a San Francisco-based company that runs millions of Web sites through its TypePad and LiveJournal blogging services. The attack also shut down operations for roughly 12 hours at Tucows Inc., a Toronto-based Internet services company that helped manage Blue Security's site.

Tucows chief executive Elliot Noss called the attack "by far the largest the company had ever seen," and said that only a handful of companies have the infrastructure in place to withstand such an assault, much less a more powerful one.

"This attack really was like trying to take out a mosquito with an atomic bomb," Noss said.

The FBI is investigating the attacks, according to Six Apart, but agency officials would not confirm a federal investigation yesterday.

Todd Underwood, chief of operations and security for Renesys Corp., a company that monitors Internet connectivity, called the attack against Blue Security "unsurprising but sad."

The innovative approach in the fight against spam caught the attention of investors in 2004, when Blue Security received more than $4 million in venture capital, but critics questioned whether the company could win such a massive battle.

"When the company's founders first approached the broader anti-spam community and asked them what they thought of the idea, everyone said this was a terrible idea and that they would eventually cause a lot of collateral damage," Underwood said. "But it's also extremely unfortunate, because it shows how much the spammers are winning this battle." "
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 809 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
EmilyGreen
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 06:51 pm
This is a real shame. I came to the internet forum specifically to start a thread asking what can be done - I guess nothing. I usually get 2 or 3 spam emails a week, but in the past few days, its gone up to 15 a day!!! I don't subscribe to much on the net that would even lead to spam emails.

Its a shame because people are just allowed to be incredibly annoying. What do the spammers even get out of sending spam emails???

I have gmail, and google seems to think they're solving the problem by simply having a SPAM folder, but I don't even want to see it there. I want the spam blocked before it even gets to my email account. Yahoo actually did a better job of that. I never saw spam in my yahoo account, but I realise that some yahoo users may have a different story.

It seems that if google can create a spam folder that identifies spam before I do, then they can have a spam BLOCKER.

Any thoughts?
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 May, 2006 07:25 pm
EmilyGreen wrote:
This is a real shame. I came to the internet forum specifically to start a thread asking what can be done - I guess nothing. I usually get 2 or 3 spam emails a week, but in the past few days, its gone up to 15 a day!!! I don't subscribe to much on the net that would even lead to spam emails.

Its a shame because people are just allowed to be incredibly annoying. What do the spammers even get out of sending spam emails???

I have gmail, and google seems to think they're solving the problem by simply having a SPAM folder, but I don't even want to see it there. I want the spam blocked before it even gets to my email account. Yahoo actually did a better job of that. I never saw spam in my yahoo account, but I realise that some yahoo users may have a different story.

It seems that if google can create a spam folder that identifies spam before I do, then they can have a spam BLOCKER.

Any thoughts?


First of all, a "Spam" folder is a good idea. Even the best anti-spam software might accidently identify an email you want to get as spam. Don't you want to make sure that email you want to see isn't accidentally erased?

I use spam assassin which is an open source program that lives on your computer. It uses a pretty advanced algorithm to learn how to distinguish from what you consider spam, and what you don't-- and what is cool is that it learns from its mistakes (if you tell it is got one wrong). It is right 99.99% of the time.

I get 5-10 emails in my spam folder daily (this number will go down soon since I am going to be dropping one of my email addresses which seems to be on the cheap viagra list). It takes me 30 seconds to skim the from line to see if it is anyone I was hoping to hear from.

I don't find this to be a major problem.
0 Replies
 
EmilyGreen
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 May, 2006 05:08 am
Major problem??? I definately consider it a major problem. I don't like solicitation in any form, not at my door, my mailbox, or my email. Look at the lengths we're having to go just to block SOME of the spam.

Thanks to the blockhead morons that fall for the crap, we all get bombarded with junkmail.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 May, 2006 08:56 am
EmilyGreen wrote:
Major problem??? I definately consider it a major problem. I don't like solicitation in any form, not at my door, my mailbox, or my email. Look at the lengths we're having to go just to block SOME of the spam.

Thanks to the blockhead morons that fall for the crap, we all get bombarded with junkmail.


Emily, the reason I say it is not a major problem is that you don't have to go to great length to block MOST of the spam.

If you get the right technology-- which is even free-- you can deal with this problem in 20-30 seconds a day. I have worse things to worry about.

I am sorry you hat solitication so much, and if this bothers you on principle, there isn't much I can tell you other than you are going to have to live with it.

But this is problem that can be dealt with without much time or effort.
0 Replies
 
EmilyGreen
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 May, 2006 09:34 am
It shouldn't be tolerated at all.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 May, 2006 12:05 pm
I get virtually none in Yahoo, and a mere handful in gmail.
0 Replies
 
scrimp212
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Jun, 2006 05:59 pm
EmilyGreen wrote:

Thanks to the blockhead morons that fall for the crap, we all get bombarded with junkmail.


Just remember that some of those blockead morons could be people that you know personally. Just a thought
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

YouTube Is Doomed - Discussion by Shapeless
So I just joined Facebook.... - Discussion by DrewDad
Internet disinformation overload - Discussion by rosborne979
Participatory Democracy Online - Discussion by wandeljw
OpenDNS and net neutrality - Question by Butrflynet
Internet Explorer 8? - Question by Pitter
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Spamming the spammers can backfire
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/29/2024 at 12:15:01