1
   

PRIVATE PRIVATE FORUMS

 
 
yitwail
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Apr, 2006 04:52 pm
technically speaking, you may have a point, but the online dictionaries i'm aware of don't have an entry for either word, so it's unclear if they're alternate spellings or different terms. time to consult the OED, perhaps.
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Apr, 2006 12:13 pm
I think a "Private Private Thread" may be kiddy porn.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Apr, 2006 12:14 pm
a2k has private private threads? Shocked
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Apr, 2006 12:18 pm
The author of this thread has a paranoid delusion about a member or members here stalking her (?), and has made extravagent accusations against a neighbor about tapping phone lines, and cable tv lines, at her home.

It seems the author of this thread believes that the private messaging function here constitutes a "private private forum."

I have absolutely no notion of where Noddy came up with the ludicrous statement about kiddy porn.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Apr, 2006 12:23 pm
Just roll with it, Set.
0 Replies
 
cyphercat
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Apr, 2006 01:33 pm
So THAT'S why everyone's always so hot and bothered about getting their PM priviledges!
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Apr, 2006 01:47 pm
I think Noddy came up with it from the original post that says something like "Child porn is what I'm talking about".
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Apr, 2006 01:48 pm
gustavratzenhofer wrote:
Just roll with it, Set.



sometimes set catches the softball....sometimes he muffs it....
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Apr, 2006 02:25 pm
Re: PRIVATE PRIVATE FORUMS
Noddy's source is the original post in this thread.

joluma wrote:
Child porn, of course, is what I am speaking of.


Could joluma be related to PoetSeductress?
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Apr, 2006 03:05 pm
I'm reminded of the comparison, "Ugly as homemade sin."
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Apr, 2006 03:13 pm
Setanta wrote:
The author of this thread has a paranoid delusion about a member or members here stalking her (?), and has made extravagent accusations against a neighbor about tapping phone lines, and cable tv lines, at her home.

It seems the author of this thread believes that the private messaging function here constitutes a "private private forum."

I have absolutely no notion of where Noddy came up with the ludicrous statement about kiddy porn.
Leave my girlfriend alone! IT'S A CONSPIRACY!
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Apr, 2006 04:33 pm
Good lookin' out on the child porn reference--i hadn't actually read that far--i had attempted a rational answer and some help in the other "help i'm being stalked thread" which contains the wild accusations about someone splicing into her telephone lines and cable tv line. When i got to this crap, my eyes started to glaze over as i read the first post, and i never made it as far as child porn.

Doesn't surprise me though.

However, an allegation that the character is ensnared with MOAN and PS does inject some new interest . . . although it won't last . . .
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 12:10 pm
joluma wrote:
I have called the FBI. However, I'm not at all sure I was really talking with the FBI, since this malicious person appeared to be over-hearing my phone conversations.


Why not use a different phone?
Confused
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 01:42 pm
I still don't know what a private private forum is. Maybe that's a good thing.
0 Replies
 
KetchupLady
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Apr, 2006 08:24 am
Is it like double secret probation?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Apr, 2006 08:30 am
Miller wrote:
joluma wrote:
I have called the FBI. However, I'm not at all sure I was really talking with the FBI, since this malicious person appeared to be over-hearing my phone conversations.


Why not use a different phone?
Confused


It is worth noting that having one's phone tapped will not interfer with placing a call--if you call the FBI, the call will go through, whether or not your phone is tapped.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Apr, 2006 11:35 am
Anybody want to see my private privates?

<insert picture of Gomer Pyle here>
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Apr, 2006 11:38 am
feelin a little frisky ...duck?
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Apr, 2006 11:51 am
Tee hee.
0 Replies
 
lumajo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Aug, 2006 08:15 pm
Setanta wrote:
Miller wrote:
joluma wrote:
I have called the FBI. However, I'm not at all sure I was really talking with the FBI, since this malicious person appeared to be over-hearing my phone conversations.


Why not use a different phone?
Confused


It is worth noting that having one's phone tapped will not interfer with placing a call--if you call the FBI, the call will go through, whether or not your phone is tapped.


Ever heard of re-direction of a phone call? That's what the FBI calls it, and they don't like it, especially when a phone call to the FBI is re-directed.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

YouTube Is Doomed - Discussion by Shapeless
So I just joined Facebook.... - Discussion by DrewDad
Internet disinformation overload - Discussion by rosborne979
Participatory Democracy Online - Discussion by wandeljw
OpenDNS and net neutrality - Question by Butrflynet
Internet Explorer 8? - Question by Pitter
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/10/2024 at 11:27:17