1
   

Chines factories hum, but conditions are worse

 
 
Reply Sat 14 Jan, 2006 12:32 am
A report by reuters (as of Tuesday, December 13, 2005, still online at 'The Finacial Express') says that "China's already thrumming factories cranked up output further in the year to November on the back of booming exports, sustained investment growth and solid consumer spending."

"China's rapid industrialisation, rooted in cheap labour and the embrace of modern, foreign technology, has been the main engine of development over the past quarter of a century."

However, different signals come from the UK:

Quote:
Shop until they drop: UK stores shocked by conditions in their Chinese factories

By Martin Hickman, Consumer Affairs Correspondent
Published: 14 January 2006
Clothes and toys on sale in Britain's high streets are made by Chinese workers forced to endure illegal, exhausting and dangerous conditions, according to a new study. It will increase the pressure on retailers to monitor the conditions in which their products are made.

A three-year investigation into booming export factories for companies such as Marks & Spencer and Ikea discovered the human cost of China's "economic miracle". It found an army of powerless rural migrants toiling up to 14 hours a day, almost every day. Many were allowed just one day off a month and paid less than £50 a month for shifts that breached Chinese law and International Labour Organisation rules. Despite evidence of the shocking working conditions, cheap clothes, toys and increasingly electronic goods from the sweatshops are on sale in British shops with household names, including those with ethical buying policies.

Ethical trading consultants for Impactt, which works with businesses to improve their social impact around the world, were allowed into 100 factories supplying 11 British retailers.

They found that "ethical audits" - the conventional method of checking conditions - were ineffective because of falsification of records. Instead, working hours were cut by improving efficiency, said their report, Changing Over Time, sponsored by the Co-operative Insurance Society. But even these reduced working hours still exceeded Chinese labour limits, said Rosey Hurst, Impactt's director. She added: "What has surprised and depressed us since 1998 when we started working in China is that all the efforts of the ... companies have made very little difference to the working standards. The response by Chinese factories is to work out how better to cook the books."

Companies are attracted to doing business in the People's Republic of China because of its low-tax development zones, cut-price abundant workforce, and totalitarianism. Independent trade unions are banned by the Communist Party. Assembly-line personnel in free-trade zones in south China operate machinery without safety guards and spray paint with inadequate face masks. They often die in industrial accidents or fromgulaosi, the Chinese term for death from overwork. Workplace death rates in China are at least 12 times those of Britain and 13 factory workers a day lose a finger or an arm in the boom city of Shenzhen. In a sign of official disquiet, the state-owned China Daily reported in November that a 30-year-old woman, He Chunmei, died from exhaustion after working 24-hours non-stop at a handicraft factory.

The International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers Union fears that multinationals are in a "race to the bottom" in workers' conditions. Neil Kearney, its general secretary, said: "There's no such thing as cheap clothing because ... the main people paying the price are the people producing it." Of a factory visit two months ago, he recalled: "There were about 700 workers in this factory. Those workers appeared dirty, raggedly clothed and malnourished. If you had taken some black-and-white pictures they would have fitted not too badly into Dickensian scenes.

"They were sharing 12 men to a room. Literally they had a box to themselves, like the boxes you see in the films of the concentration camps. The washing facilities were a cold water tap on a balcony. The wages were something like ... £1 a day."

Such miserable conditions allow China to undercut developing countries by up to 60 per cent. It now supplies 90 per cent of the world's toys and one-fifth of Europe's clothes, though textile exports are soaring. With explosive annual growth of 9 per cent, China overtook the UK last month as the world's fourth largest economy and is forecast to pass Germany by 2010. Its transformation from peasant economy to industrial marvel has drawn 100 million peasants to the cities - the largest human movement of people in history. Most of the workers end up in the free-trade factories of the Pearl River Delta. Little publicity emerges about these factories because they are privately run and in Guangdong province, which is 1,500 miles from foreign correspondents in Beijing.

The Chinese authorities acknowledged last month that 80 per cent of private companies "frequently violated" workers' rights. Mick Duncan, national secretary of the anti-sweatshop campaign No Sweat, said: "There has been an increase in workers' unrest and rebellion and in strikes and even kidnappings of factory managers and people do not resort to those kind of measures unless they are really forced to. I think that's an indication of how awful things are."

The growth in trade with China

By Martin Hodgson

* Figures published this week showed that China's trade surplus with the rest of the world more than tripled to $102bn (£58bn) last year, as its exports outstripped imports.

* The country's exports rose by 28.4 per cent to $762bn (£429bn), while its imports rose by just under 18 per cent to $660bn (£371bn).

* China's biggest trading partner was the European Union, with bilateral trade rising by 22.6 per cent to $217bn (£122bn) in 2005. The US is China's second largest trade partner, followed by Japan.

* Within the EU, the UK is China's third largest trading partner, importing £10.6bn of goods from China during 2004, the last year for which the Department of Trade and Industry has published figures.

* China's principal exports to Britain are IT and telecommunications equipment, clothes, toys, furniture and machinery.

* Figures for December suggest the rate of China's export growth was beginning to slow, and some analysts predict export growth could drop compared with last year as the US loses its appetite for cheap Chinese goods and the yuan gains value.

* Last year, Beijing revalued the yuan for the first time in a decade, allowing its value to fluctuate within a narrow trading band, but many analysts believe it could strengthen further if China allowed it to trade freely.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 997 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Jan, 2006 12:37 am
This "Le Monde diplomatique" report gives some interesting background information as well:

Quote:
An uncertain future for a two-tier society

China breaks the iron rice bowl

China has moved into fourth position in the league table of world economies, but only a third of its population has access to the new temple of consumerism. The rural poor, internal imigrants and laid-off workers suffer worst from the gross new inequalities


By Martine Bulard

Somewhere between the third and fourth ringroad in northeast Beijing is one of the city's most happening spots. Unit 798 is a handsome cluster of red-brick buildings in the Bauhaus style, occupied by avant-garde galleries, trendy restaurants and chic boutiques.

Before it was fashionable, Unit 798 housed a danwei - a large state company employing some 20,000 workers to manufacture arms. Its premises, designed in 1957 in the name of socialist solidarity by East German specialists, were nearly a kilometre long. In those days every big company had its own housing, schools, clinics, even its own theatre. In those days the Dashanzi complex, to which Unit 798 is attached, saw itself as a model. Those days ended less than 15 years ago. Since then economic reform has swept away the factories, the workers and their families.

The abandoned factories were quietly rotting when a few breakaway artists decided to move in. Red tape, police controls and power cuts made life difficult, but they managed to establish themselves and now play a significant role in contemporary creative arts. The communist leadership finally left them to it and is now actively defending this artists' community against the market: the Seven Stars Group Corporation has taken over Dashanzi and intends to clear the area to make way for a new, more profitable, technology park. A paradox: authorities whose zeal for censorship and repression is well-documented (China limits internet access and jails trade unionists at the drop of a hat) suddenly find themselves defending artists' freedoms. But perhaps, in terms of image-damaging potential, vaguely stroppy bohemians are less trouble than genuinely militant workers (1).

Near Chengde and the imperial summer palace, 300km from Dashanzi, the Cheng Gang steelworks (Chengde Iron and Steel Group Co) has not gone under in the reformist flood. Its workers are proud to show visitors around, with the prior permission of the Communist party secretary, of course. The steel they produce was used to build the Oriental Pearl television tower in Shanghai, symbol of the city's new modernity, and also the gargantuan Yangtze dam.

The unit they show visitors is entirely automated, using Italian technology. Apart from a few controllers on the platforms, the workers sit behind computer screens in little cabins: an ultra-modern factory. Yet a few hundred metres away, the non-modernised part is a 19th-century hell, with rusty, decrepit machinery covered in grey dust. They do not let you visit this: "It wouldn't be good for your health," says our guide. What about the health of the workers handling highly polluting materials (lime, manganese and sulphur, by the looks of them) without gloves?

The two parts of this steelworks sum up China's industrial history. Until 1986, 20,500 workers lived, for better or worse, in the small town of Cheng Gang, where the factory looked after everything - education, pensions, housing, healthcare and sport. But the combination of economic reform and rising national demand for steel began to eat away at the system. The state wanted results. Even before technological modernisation, the company replaced its established workforce, deemed insufficiently productive, with younger, faster, sometimes better-qualified workers. Then western technology was installed, and employees had to adapt. The workforce fell to 17,000, the average age to 35.


Full report
0 Replies
 
satt fs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Jan, 2006 02:17 am
They should be free to move, and markets for foods shoud be fully operational with market mechanisms.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Jan, 2006 03:46 am
The International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers Union fears that multinationals are in a "race to the bottom" in workers' conditions. Neil Kearney, its general secretary, said: "There's no such thing as cheap clothing because ... the main people paying the price are the people producing it." Of a factory visit two months ago, he recalled: "There were about 700 workers in this factory. Those workers appeared dirty, raggedly clothed and malnourished. If you had taken some black-and-white pictures they would have fitted not too badly into Dickensian scenes.

"They were sharing 12 men to a room. Literally they had a box to themselves, like the boxes you see in the films of the concentration camps. The washing facilities were a cold water tap on a balcony. The wages were something like ... £1 a day."


Appalling. It's time that the trade unions of "developed" countries joined together & ran a huge campaign about these issues & supported the Chinese workers. Names (of the big multinationals involved) should be named. Remember the Nike campaign? This would be much bigger & decidely more scandalous for those profiting from this exploitation. It would be good if the Chinese government felt some heat, too. So this is the workers' paradise, huh? Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
J-B
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2006 07:02 pm
All the views here are sincere and objective. I appreciate that.

As one of those who constitute "one third of the population who enjoys the consumerism", many fellows and I often feel shame at that, and frequently disgusted by those around us who spend there money in the same fashion as they throw away toilet paper and have no guilt at all in becoming probably 1 million times richer than someone else in the same country or just in the same district, who are calculating whether the day's earning is enough to assure the dinner and also who have made up a vast mass of people.
But I do think the government has begun to make effort to make better living standard for the poor. The reason is: They are not jackasses after all. They know that the increasing inequality is endangering the situation and their political foundation. And the recent (especially after Hu and When took charge) policies and laws all prove that. It's a matter of time, but perhaps long time, tragically.
0 Replies
 
raymond chan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Feb, 2006 11:35 am
Money! Money! Money!
The only thing that they want just profits!
The only thing that workers want just maintenance!

China is still too poor!
The only thing that we can do is making money to improve this situation!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Chines factories hum, but conditions are worse
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 09:22:54