0
   

Women Who Make the World Worse

 
 
Miller
 
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 11:20 am
Women Who Make the World Worse

by Kate O'Beirne

Who better to expose the destructiveness of feminism than a fearless female conservative? In Women Who Make the World Worse, National Review's Kate O'Beirne takes on America's leading feminists: Hillary Clinton, Gloria Steinem, Eleanor Smeal, Maureen Dowd, Kate Michelman, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and even Sex and the City's Carrie Bradshaw. She opposes their propagandistic Leftist emotionalism and self-important grandstanding with irrefutable evidence that the feminist movement -- including some of those very women -- has hurt women far more than it has helped them over the last forty years. Women Who Make the World Worse shows how feminism has devastated American society: fracturing families; making American schools and workplaces into battlefields to advance feminist causes; and exalting working women among mothers and consigning millions of children to a soulless upbringing by daycare center employees. Through it all, O'Beirne shows that feminists have poisoned American public discourse about gender issues with politically charged claptrap about how a hostile patriarchy makes women its helpless victims.

Yet O'Beirne proves here that it is actually men - and boys - who are bearing a considerable amount of the actual suffering. Millions of schoolboys are being feminized in American classrooms; boys' sports are in retreat in schools everywhere; the "gender gap" deforms local and national politics; millions of husbands and fathers (and wives and mothers) believe that men are not needed in the raising of children; and worst of all, transforming the American military into a laboratory for large-scale social engineering puts us all at risk.

O'Beirne establishes that the feminist agenda is at its core not pro-female at all; it's merely anti-male. She demolishes the prevailing myth among feminists that men are the enemy of women's progress. This provocative book is essential reading for anyone, male or female, who is looking for some old-fashioned common sense about relations between the sexes.

Revealed -- Feminism's war on men, the family, and the military:

* How feminists insist that there are no innate differences between men and women -- except when they find it convenient to argue the opposite

* The prominent feminist who dismissed the traditional family as a "storybook idea"

* The husband of a famous feminist who advised men not to marry feminists!

* How feminists ignored good news about declines in domestic violence rates and trumped up a "national epidemic" of such violence -- largely in order to keep themselves employed

* Why the feminist movement has for so long been on a collision course with what we know to be true about the natural bond between mother and child

* The feminist leader who refused to acknowledge overwhelming evidence that most working women would prefer to stay at home, and that parents don't want the government-run programs that she advocates for toddlers

* Hypocrisy: how the liberal proponents of center-based child care are in reality advocating the boosting of profits for big business, tax cuts for the rich, and the sabotaging of women's choices

* How the media generally mimics feminist talking points and ignores the mountains of evidence that disproves feminist orthodoxy

* Disproved: the common myth that women with similar education, skills, and job experience work for salaries 25 percent less than those of men

* Women who wised up after mistakenly heeding the calls of feminist sirens to put off marriage and motherhood to chase career goals

* It's sexual harassment if I say so: feminists who actually argue that whether or not actionable sexual harassment has taken place must be judged by a subjective standard based on what any particular woman might find offensive

* How the feminist theory on sexual harassment is clearly based on the work of Catharine McKinnon, who declared that all heterosexual intercourse was rape

* The destructive gender war in our schools and universities: how it has harmed girls, boys, and serious scholarship

* How gender warriors treat American boys as unindicted coconspirators in history's gender crimes, while girls are taught to see themselves as helpless victims of a phantom, crippling gender bias

* Social engineering in the classroom: how it has become ever rarer for feminized, feminist educators to present boys with strong male role models

* Debunked: the feminist insistence that girls' comparative lack of interest in athletics is the result of gender discrimination and social conditioning to avoid traditionally male activities

* How Title IX has not actually increased the number of girls playing sports, and has harmed athletic programs in general

* Women in combat: why it's a bad idea -- and how it's endangering our troops in Iraq

* The myth, uncritically hyped by the media, that our patriarchal culture silences adolescent girls

* The double standard demanded by feminists for women in the military: it isn't confined only to physical tests

* How feminists exploit the abuse and deaths of young women in combat situations to advance their agenda of androgyny and abortion

* How feminist political activists consistently refuse to face the implications of the fact that Republicans have been winning more presidential elections than Democrats -- and even carrying more of the female vote

* The female Army Captain who successfully completed a mission to secure a dog kennel -- and was hailed by the politically correct establishment as a new McArthur or Patton!

* Why modern feminism's biggest enemies are the smallest of all humans: the unborn

* Exploded: the persistent myth that most women support the feminists' abortion-on-demand agenda

* The pro-life agenda: is it really a vote-killer, as both parties seem to believe? Solid evidence that the pro-life advantage is actually unequivocal in the voting booth

* The feminist psychologist who began in 1975 to try to prove that there are no innate differences between men and women -- and who now admits that "it didn't work out"

* Little-noted, and highly politically incorrect, data about just how profoundly different men and women really are


Human Events Book Service. .
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 766 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
Chai
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 11:33 am
Phyllis Schlafly was right all along.

http://www.americanheritage.com/assets/images/articles/web/20051102-phyllis-schlafly.jpg
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 11:36 am
So it's a pro-life tract masquerading as "intellectual." Got it.
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 11:46 am
Miller wrote:
Women Who Make the World Worse

by Kate O'Beirne

Who better to expose the destructiveness of feminism than a fearless female conservative? In Women Who Make the World Worse, National Review's Kate O'Beirne takes on America's leading feminists: Hillary Clinton, Gloria Steinem, Eleanor Smeal, Maureen Dowd, Kate Michelman, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and even Sex and the City's Carrie Bradshaw. She opposes their propagandistic Leftist emotionalism and self-important grandstanding with irrefutable evidence that the feminist movement -- including some of those very women -- has hurt women far more than it has helped them over the last forty years. Women Who Make the World Worse shows how feminism has devastated American society: fracturing families; making American schools and workplaces into battlefields to advance feminist causes; and exalting working women among mothers and consigning millions of children to a soulless upbringing by daycare center employees. Through it all, O'Beirne shows that feminists have poisoned American public discourse about gender issues with politically charged claptrap about how a hostile patriarchy makes women its helpless victims.

Yet O'Beirne proves here that it is actually men - and boys - who are bearing a considerable amount of the actual suffering. Millions of schoolboys are being feminized in American classrooms; boys' sports are in retreat in schools everywhere; the "gender gap" deforms local and national politics; millions of husbands and fathers (and wives and mothers) believe that men are not needed in the raising of children; and worst of all, transforming the American military into a laboratory for large-scale social engineering puts us all at risk.


Human Events Book Service. .
I just don't know where to start...

The listing of women at the start is essentially just a list of women who are constantly attacked by a certain sector so it becomes clear rather quickly that this book is just an attempt of some looney tooned whacko Conservative-wanna-be to denigrate any woman who has a backbone or stands up for herself and her own beliefs.

Mind you, it is well known that I am not a fan of Hillary Rodham Clinton or Maureen Dowd or the Tarts In The City program however all these women are strong and independent and in my view that alone makes them valued people and role models for young girls everywhere to know that they can succeed at anything they want.

As to the assertion that men are the one's who suffer the most, a few things need to be looked at. How much do men allow this? How much pleasure (emotional or other) do men derive from this alleged abuse? Is it really abuse or just a balancing of the scales? Now at first it may be argued that the scales are not being fairly balanced since women are allowed into male venues with less resistance than men being allowed into feminine venues; however this is more due to men not being willing to fight harder. If a man wants to join a women's group, he can do so...although the stereotyping which society enjoys engaging in, will quickly label him a homosexual. Perhaps men need to push as hard for their rights as women have.

A little later I may be back to state my reaction to each of O'Beirne's statements which you listed...we'll see. For now, I just leave it as O'Beirne being a disgruntled person.
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 11:48 am
Interesting.

I remember when my brother came back from Iraq. One of the stories he told was about how tension was greatly reduced simply by ensuring that there were women soldiers stationed at checkpoints. It seems a lot of turmoil was caused by the fact that Muslim people did not want women searched by men at these checkpoints...

Oh, by the way, he's a General in the Army. He has no problem with women soldiers.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 11:51 am
btw, WHICH feminism? There are three main streams of it, and many subdivisions. Often feminists of one school disagree with another. It's not a church, you know. So WHO or what are we talking about exactly?

that whole article is ridiculous.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 11:54 am
Quote: " Muslim people did not want women searched by men at these checkpoints".

What's the policy at US airport security stations?
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jan, 2006 12:04 pm
I don't know.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Women Who Make the World Worse
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/23/2024 at 05:19:14