ehBeth wrote:mmm
yeah
but are there really that many women without nipples?
Damn! Now you know my secret...I haven't seen the damn things since that party in 2003, round 3.00 am, and I want the person who borrowed them to BRING THEM BACK!
The article says:
Quote:But of course Barbie is not real, and was never intended to represent a healthy body or physical ideal
uhh.. ok, so if that statement were true, why are there not variations of the doll?
Oh yeah.. wait.. thats right.. Mattel introduced colored dolls long ago.
Thats enough variation right?
I mean.. besides color, there are no diffrences.......
So, if barbie isnt supposed to be a reflection of ANY human.. why, Mattel, did you feel the need to create colored dolls? H U H ?
Mattel is the anti-christ.
The muslim world has come up with their version, a doll names Fulla.
Actually, I liked the idea from the article I read.
It's a doll that reflects the ideals of the muslim world. Modesty, motherhood, etc.
I mean, that's better than aspiring to be a useless bubble brain with an impossible figure.
Their doll is of normal proportions, has more open features, dresses modestly, and there is NO Ken boyfriend.
yeah.. lets all go buy a barbie.
Hang her, pour alcohol on her, light her hair on fire, stick pins in her buns then microwave her to a crisp
Sounds like little girls have the right idea. ;-)
Oh yeah.. wait.. thats right.. Mattel introduced colored dolls long ago.
Thats enough variation right?
I mean.. besides color, there are no diffrences.......
