2
   

A person who retired at 35 with safe investments???

 
 
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 12:52 pm
I'm not sure if this is true or not however I heard there was this 30 something year old man who retired with at least a million dollars doing some safe "investments" (not sure what the proper financial lingo is) and he also created a book on how he retired. I was just wondering does anybody know who this person is? What kind of investments did he do? Is his way of investment the most effective? If not what is the most effective way to invest with minimal risk? I heard there was some kind of funds/bonds where you put a tiny portion of money into it monthly that way you can gain interest on it in the future as it builds up. I'm not sure if that's true or not.

Oh, I believe this person lives in Toronto (somewhere around there) and he's Canadian (not sure if that'll help).

Essentially what I'm asking is not about this person it's just about what's the most effective way to "invest" our money so we'll earn substantial returns in the future? Thanks a bunch.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 2 • Views: 6,902 • Replies: 16
No top replies

 
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Sep, 2005 08:31 pm
Not sure if this is the book you mean, but you might want to check into "Your Money or Your Life" By Joe & Vicki Robbins. I'm not sure of the spelling of their last name. The focus of the book is how to invest, live simply and retire early.
0 Replies
 
AbleIIKnow wong
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Sep, 2005 11:58 pm
Green Witch wrote:
Not sure if this is the book you mean, but you might want to check into "Your Money or Your Life" By Joe & Vicki Robbins. I'm not sure of the spelling of their last name. The focus of the book is how to invest, live simply and retire early.


It's cool, thanks for taking a shot at it Green. Hmmmmm.. my next question... I'll see if I can ask in the appropriate thread, thanks again.
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 12:31 am
BM
0 Replies
 
dragon49
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 07:51 am
wong, i haven't heard of this book or this guy. alot of this really depends on how much he made while he working and how much he saved. i mean if you are making $200,000 a year and living on say $40,000 of it, its easy to save. but if you are basically living pay check to pay check, it isn't that easy.

there are many ways to invest, some safe, some "more aggressive". there is no really safe way to get a huge return, generally larger return = larger risk. if there were, everyone would be doing it. however, there are some very smart ways to save for retirement.
0 Replies
 
AbleIIKnow wong
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 04:36 pm
Oh okay that's cool, thanks. What's BM by the way?
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 05:55 pm
BM = bookmark. The person doing it will be notified when someone replies to a topic that interests them.

Hey, Kicky if you want to know more about the Voluntary Simiplicity movement or living on less in order to have more freedom - just ask- I might be able to help.
0 Replies
 
AbleIIKnow wong
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 08:52 am
That's cool, thanks Green.

I found out who it was Derek Foster "Stop Working." He said something about invest where you get paid in dividends, etc. I heard the book was well written and people who opinionated on it found it entertaining.
0 Replies
 
utrnewsletter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 02:52 pm
1mil plus while your in your 30's isn't that the american dream. well part of it
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 03:07 pm
Not really! Considering that people live longer these
days, a 35 year old man might live another 50 years and
if he spends around $ 50,000 per annum for cost of living,
mortgage etc. he'll be broke even before retirement age,
and there aren't inflation or taxes included yet.
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 03:18 pm
Why would he be broke? If he just spends what his chunk of dough earns in interest each year (yearly interest on $1mil should be at least 8 or 9%, even if the guy's an investing ninny, right?), he could live on $80-90k for years and still not have to touch his core chunk of dough.

Or am I missing something?
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 03:19 pm
2 points...

One million won't get you very far if you plan on living off of just that.
It will get eaten up very quickly with inflation. Assume a 5% return which means you are only getting $50K a year. In 10 years inflation will have made that $50K equal to less than 40K. Now imagine 20 years after that.


Second point -
Making one million by the time you are 30 is not a normal return. There are reasons that every investment comes with a disclaimer. At the height of the day trading, one person made headlines when he retired with over a million in investments. At the same time hundreds or thousands were going broke trying the same thing. You might be the lucky one, but probably not. If this person made all his money off getting stock and dividends where he worked then he should feel lucky he didn't work at Enron, Tyco, Worldcom, etc, etc...
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 03:26 pm
kickycan wrote:
Why would he be broke? If he just spends what his chunk of dough earns in interest each year (yearly interest on $1mil should be at least 8 or 9%, even if the guy's an investing ninny, right?), he could live on $80-90k for years and still not have to touch his core chunk of dough.

Or am I missing something?


It doesn't quite work that way. There is no guarenteed 8% every year. You can average that if you invest in stocks but you are risking the vageries of the market. Say one year the market drops 10%. If you still take out your 8% then you have less than $1 million invested. 2 or 3 down years can do big damage to the principle if you are living off it.

Taxes and inflation also eat into your earnings every year.
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 03:33 pm
Ah, I see.
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2005 10:57 am
parados wrote:
It doesn't quite work that way. There is no guarenteed 8% every year. You can average that if you invest in stocks but you are risking the vageries of the market. Say one year the market drops 10%. If you still take out your 8% then you have less than $1 million invested. 2 or 3 down years can do big damage to the principle if you are living off it.

Taxes and inflation also eat into your earnings every year.


You are right that there isn't a "guarantee" of 8% every year, but relatively speaking, it isn't difficult to realize 10% if you're young and willing to take even moderate risks. It wouldn't, most likely, be recommended to older investors, but the subject in question is in his early 30's, so has every opportunity to not only live well from his initial investments, but most likely significantly increase his principle.

I haven't read the book, but dividend reinvesting is pretty standard advice. The trick is to do your homework tenfold before investing and every once in a while, follow your instincts.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Oct, 2005 11:17 am
You can average 10% over the long term, 10 years or more. But that assumes you are not taking any principle out. Once you start taking out the principle to meet needs it can eat into your long term average.

If you have 1mil and earn 10% you will have 1.1 mil at the end of the year you take out .1 and have 1 mil left over to do the same thing next year.

If you have 1 mil and lose 10% you will have .9 mil at the end of the year if you take out .1 it leaves you with .8 mil. That means you have to make 37% on your investments the next year to get to the 1.1 mil and keep pace.

If you retire and make 37% the first year it puts you ahead of the game but it is merely luck.

This was presented as someone that retired at 30 which would imply he is living off his investments. If you have a million at 30 and semi retire but work to pay some or all of your living expenses then I would agree with you JW. That million will continue to grow nicely and by 50 should be 3 or 4 million.
0 Replies
 
Xias
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 02:42 pm
That's assuming you need 50k a year. If you already own your house, you could easily live on less than that.

Given my current expenses, I could live on 20k a year pretty easily.

This will vary depending on your preferred lifestyle and whether or not you have kids (I don't Very Happy )
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Where is the US economy headed? - Discussion by au1929
Shopping Around For Loans - Question by Brandon9000
What is greed? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
bonds series h - Question by allen russell
Naked Short Selling - Question by optimus cubed
HOW TO GET WEALTHY - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » A person who retired at 35 with safe investments???
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/20/2024 at 03:18:50