2
   

Why didn't the United States hang(kill) the Japanese emperor after winning World War II?

 
 
zzpsx
 
Reply Thu 23 Jan, 2025 06:22 pm
Why didn't the United States hang(kill) the Japanese emperor after winning World War II?
 
glitterbag
 
  2  
Reply Thu 23 Jan, 2025 06:29 pm
Are you filling out an Ancestry form?
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  3  
Reply Fri 24 Jan, 2025 06:58 am
@zzpsx,
Why would they do that? That sounds like a pretty serious war crime.
hightor
 
  4  
Reply Fri 24 Jan, 2025 08:21 am
@zzpsx,
Quote:
Following the surrender of Japan, Emperor Hirohito was not prosecuted for war crimes at the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal even though the Japanese had waged war in his name. The head of the Allied occupation of the country, Douglas MacArthur, believed that a cooperative emperor would facilitate a peaceful occupation and other U.S. postwar objectives. MacArthur therefore excluded any evidence from the tribunal which could have incriminated Hirohito or other members of the royal family.[1] In 1946, Hirohito was pressured by the Allies into renouncing his divinity. Under Japan's new constitution drafted by U.S. officials, his role as emperor was redefined in 1947 as "the symbol of the State and of the unity of the people".

wikipedia
0 Replies
 
zzpsx
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Jan, 2025 09:16 pm
@engineer,
He is a war criminal!
glitterbag
 
  2  
Reply Sat 25 Jan, 2025 12:41 am
@zzpsx,
So were the Generals of the rebel Confederate forces during the American Civil War, Lincoln didn't hang them.
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Why didn't the United States hang(kill) the Japanese emperor after winning World War II?
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/26/2025 at 11:53:42